Channel
@fizik_ghorbaniii
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
55,256subscribers
-6,376 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001295416292 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fizik_ghorbaniii |
| Description | 🔴آموزش فیزیک کنکور و نهایی رشته تجربی و ریاضی 🏆رتبه ۳۸۶ مهندسی مکانیک کانال نتایج و نظرات:👇 @feedback_ghorbani 🌐 سفارش دوره :👇 @ghorbani_support1 📱 02171057844 🌐 www.fizikghorbani.com |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fizik_ghorbaniii |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 22:16 | 55,256 | -386 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 55,642 | -146 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 55,788 | -139 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 55,927 | -94 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 56,021 | -109 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 56,130 | -229 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 56,359 | -327 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 56,686 | -237 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:13 | 56,923 | -118 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:42 | 57,041 | -105 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:04 | 57,146 | -169 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 57,315 | -206 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 57,521 | -264 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 57,785 | -94 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 57,879 | -102 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 57,981 | -138 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:49 | 58,119 | -129 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:14 | 58,248 | -284 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 58,532 | -352 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 58,884 | first reading |
368 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 115 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 122 of 146 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 368 (6 August 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 265,255 |
| Reactions total | 1,269 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 17:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 46 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,463 reactions across 305 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,341 | 52.5% | |
| 👍 | 1,103 | 24.7% | |
| 💔 | 576 | 12.9% | |
| 👏 | 173 | 3.88% | |
| 😍 | 97 | 2.17% | |
| 🔥 | 68 | 1.52% | |
| 🫡 | 59 | 1.32% | |
| ❤🔥 | 32 | 0.717% | |
| 💋 | 14 | 0.314% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 317 of the 368 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,463 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 368 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fizik_ghorbaniii. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 368 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
5️⃣باید یه برنامه مطالعاتی خوب برای فیزیک داشته باشی که بتونی فیزیک دوازدهم و پایه رو با هم ببری جلو! دیگه موقع آزمون و خطا کردن و وقت تلف کردن نیست و نباید بگی حالا شروع کنیم بخونیم، بریم جلو ببینیم چی میشه... باید بدونی از کجا شروع کنی، به چه ترتیبی بخونی و بدونی که کِی قراره تموم کنی❕ که همه اینا با داشتن یه برنامه اصولی و درست محقق میشه👍
❤4
4️⃣باید از الآن به بعد فیزیک پایه رو هم ببری جلو! کسایی که تابستون شروع کردن بیشتر فصلهای فیزیک پایه رو خوندن پس تو در کنار دوازدهم باید اون فصلها رو بخونی تا جبران شه!
❤2
⭕️ تو باید سریع بررسی کنی و یه آموزش و استاد که میدونی تونسته توی مدت زمان کم دانشآموزای زیادی رو به نتیجه برسونه پیدا کنی و هرچه زودتر شروع کنی تو دیگه وقتی واسه تلف کردن نداری باید همین الآن شروع کنی
❤6
3️⃣مهر و آبان رو به هیچ عنوان نباید از دست بدی! الآن که مهر شده متاسفانه یه عده همهش درگیر این هستن که: کلاس کدوم موسسه رو ثبتنام کنم؟ کدوم آزمون شرکت کنم؟ از کدوم منبع استفاده کنم؟ فلان موسسه کلاس جدیدش شروع شده یا نه؟ و... خیلیا با درگیر شدن با این موضوعات مهر و آبان رو هم از دست میدن و رسما نصف سال کنکورشون میره و همچنان درگیر اینن که کدوم کلاس شرکت کنن!
❤5
⭕️ توی طول سال کلی تایم مُرده هست که خیلیا ازش غافل میشن اگه تو از اونا استفاده کنی، حتی از بچههایی که تابستون خوندن هم جلوتر میفتی چون خیلیاشون اصلا نمیدونن که دارن این زمانهای ارزشمند رو از دست میدن وقتی رسیدیم به اون تایمهای مُرده خودم بهت میگم❤️
❤9👏2
2️⃣باید به فکر جلو زدن از کسایی باشی که زودتر شروع کردن! ببین تو باید از اونا بیشتر و بهتر درس بخونی و توی تایمهایی که اونا شُل میکنن بیشتر بخونی تا برسی بهشون ◀️مثلا توی ایام امتحانات دی که اونا تستی نمیخونن تو بخونی ◀️تجربه نشون داده توی بهمن ماه خیلیها که از تابستون شروع کردن خسته میشن و کم میارن، توی اون تایم میتونی جبران کنی توی عید که بقیه وقت تلف میکنن تو میتونی جبران کنی
❤5👏2
⭕️ ببین رفیق اگر تابستون رو از دست دادی: 1️⃣در مرحله اول باید واقعبین باشی! یعنی همین اول کار باید بپذیری که یک فرصت خوب و طلایی داشتی که ازش غافل شدی و کسایی که توی تابستون خوندن از تو جلوتر هستن!
❤4
به نظرتون اگر یک نفر صفرِ صفر باشه و هیچی از فیزیک بلد نباشه، از الآن(مهر ماه) شروع کنه میتونه فیزیک رو توی کنکور بالای ۸۰درصد بزنه؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2👏1
سلام بچهها وقتتون بخیر بعد از اومدن نمرات نهایی دیدین که ما بیشترین نمرات ۲۰ و نزدیک ۲۰ رو داشتیم. حتما از همین اول سال با آپدیت جدید دوره رایگان نهایی پلاس استارت درس خوندنتون رو بزنید👌 مطمئن باشید که با این دوره شما به نمره ۲۰ میرسید❤️
❤24
🔄آپدیت جدید دوره رایگان نهایی پلاس #یازدهم 🔴پارت۱ فصل الکتریسیته ساکن فیزیک یازدهم: https://www.aparat.com/v/zgdve71 (لینک رو توی مرورگرت کپی کن)
🔥8❤3
🔄 آپدیت جدید دوره رایگان نهایی پلاس #دوازدهم 🔴پارت۱ فصل حرکت شناسی فیزیک دوازدهم: https://www.aparat.com/v/juid8zq (لینک رو توی مرورگرت کپی کن)
❤13
💬جمع بندی صحبتهای بالا: 👈اگر دوازدهمی یا پشت کنکوری هستی، باید از منبعی استفاده کنی که مفاهیم رو خوب آموزش بده و علاوه بر کنکور تو رو واسه امتحان نهایی هم آماده کنه‼️ 👈اگه ورودی دهم یا یازدهم هستی، - حتما باید در طول سال خوب درس بخونی و اونو موکول نکنی به شب امتحان! - باید از همین الآن تستی و تشریحی بخونی چون تستی خوندن هم تو رو واسه کنکور آماده میکنه و هم باعث میشه بهراحتی از پس سوالات چالشی امتحان نهایی بر بیای
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 368 posts we hold for @fizik_ghorbaniii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
به نظرتون اگر یک نفر صفرِ صفر باشه و هیچی از فیزیک بلد نباشه، از الآن(مهر ماه) شروع کنه میتونه فیزیک رو توی کنکور بالای ۸۰درصد بزنه؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
همونطور که میدونید تستهای فیزیک کنکور ۴۰۵ نسبت به سالهای اخیر سختتر بود❗️ با این شرایط به نظرت دوره جامع نوابغ فیزیک با کنکور ۴۰۵ تطابق چند درصدی داشت⁉
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
شروع سال تحصیلی رو باید بهتون تبریک بگم یا تسلیت؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
لطفا به این سوال جواب بدید🙏 پایه چندمید❓ این روزا بیشتر دوست دارید آموزش تستی ببینید یا تشریحی⁉️
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📊 یه سؤال مهم: به نظرت برای اینکه توی کنکور به درصدهای بالای ۶۰ برسی و توی امتحان نهایی نمرههای بالای ۱۹ بگیری، چند بار باید فیزیک رو بخونی؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ویدیو استراتژی شروع از شهریور رو دیدی❓
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 368 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فیزیک کنکور | عرفان قربانی” (@fizik_ghorbaniii), 55,256 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fizik_ghorbaniii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.