11 measurements spanning 30 days, net -341. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,927–9,370 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 01:20
8,978
-41
1 Sept 2026, 17:44
9,019
-22
29 Aug 2026, 23:42
9,041
-34
26 Aug 2026, 13:09
9,075
-40
23 Aug 2026, 03:17
9,115
-161
19 Aug 2026, 14:26
9,276
-3
16 Aug 2026, 13:49
9,279
-14
13 Aug 2026, 05:57
9,293
-9
10 Aug 2026, 06:05
9,302
-12
7 Aug 2026, 06:08
9,314
-5
6 Aug 2026, 15:45
9,319
first reading
Engagement
86 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.44%
avg views ÷ 8,978 subscribers
Avg views / post
399
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 86 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 53 of 59 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
86 (2 July 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
23,518
Reactions total
377
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 05s
Average length
1m 02s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
689 reactions across 79 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
371
53.8%
🔥
86
12.5%
💯
76
11.0%
👏
55
7.98%
👍
50
7.26%
💋
41
5.95%
😍
6
0.871%
🤩
4
0.581%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 689 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
این ویدیو از اون ویدیوهای خفن کانالمونه بچه ها
از اونایی که جز واجباته کنکوره
که باید یاد داشته باشی
از داخل خود پکیج براتون اوردم
کلی تست کنکور با همین یک دونه ویدیو حل میشه
ذهنیتت خوب میشه نسبت به ریاضی
ببینش حتما عجب چیزیه👇🏻👇🏻
https://www.aparat.com/v/RiwLl/
نهایی➕ریاضی دوازدهم 👇👇👇
✅ فصل یک :(تابع) 👇
درس اول :
توابع چند جملهای صعودی و نزولی
درس دوم :
ترکیب توابع
انبساط و انقباض نمودار
درس سوم :
تابع وارون
📱 کانال رسمی 👇
محسن جعفریان | مدرس ریاضی
نهایی➕ریاضی یازدهم 👇👇👇
✅ فصل یک :
(هندسۀ تحلیلی و جبر) 👇
درس اول :
هندسه تحلیلی
درس دوم :
معادله و تابع درجه دو
درس سوم :
معادلات گویا و رادیکالی
📱 کانال رسمی 👇
محسن جعفریان | مدرس ریاضی
نهایی➕ریاضی دهم 👇👇👇
✅ فصل یک
(مجموعه، الگو و دنباله) 👇
درس اول :
مجموعههای متناهی و نامتناهی
درس دوم :
متمم یک مجموعه
درس سوم :
الگو و دنباله
درس چهارم :
دنبالههای حسابی و هندسی
📱 کانال رسمی 👇
محسن جعفریان | مدرس ریاضی
داشتم قسمت کلیدهای دبیرای قلمچی رو نگاه میکردم
به نظرتون یک دبیر کنکوری چند تا سوال باید غلط بزنه خودش؟
بعضی از دبیرها ۵ ،۶ تا تست اشتباه جواب دادن
اینا که وضع پاسخ دهی خودشون اینه واقعا چه توقعی از دانش اموزای خودشون دارن !!
اینا رو دارم واست میزارم
که این قدر الکی جو میدن
ریاضی کنکور تجربی سخت بوده
نه اینجوری نبوده
بیا این ۳ تست بالا ☝🏻☝🏻
که دقیقا از خود کتاب درسی بوده
تو یک دونه هم تست نزده باشی
هم فقط تشریحی خود کتاب درسی رو میخوندی باید این ۳ تا رو میزدی
سوال ۱۲۶ کنکور تجربی
دقیقا مشابه حالت ت
تمرین ۱۴ صفحه ۹۲ کتاب ریاضی ۳
از یک دانش اموز کنکوری حداقل توقعی که میشه داشت حل تمرین های کتاب درسی رو بلد باشه
بچه ها من درگیرم این یک مدت
ولی سعی میکنم تو هفته اینده
ریاضی کنکور تجربی ۴۰۵ رو ضبط کنم کامل براتون
و بهتون نشون بدم
که این کنکور تو درس ریاضیش سخت نبود واقعا
و میشد به درصد حدود ۵۰
به راحتی رسید
پاسخ کامل و مفصل
ریاضی انسانی ۴۰۵
@Riaziensanijafarian
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @RiaziateJafarian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
فیزیک کنکور | عرفان قربانی @fizik_ghorbaniii · 56,359 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 August 2026
🥇 ریاضی به سبک امید سلمانی @salmani_riazi · 71,826 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
زیستشناسی به سبک رضا عسگری (کانال رسمی) @bioasgarii · 56,807 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ریاضی کنکور | محسن جعفریان” (@RiaziateJafarian), 8,978 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RiaziateJafarian.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.