Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐅𝐢𝐭 𝐏𝐥𝐮𝐬

Channel

𝐅𝐢𝐭 𝐏𝐥𝐮𝐬

@fitplusgroup

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,934subscribers

+172 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002358892566
TypeChannel
Username@fitplusgroup
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fitplusgroup

Growth

5,6336,1745,903.57 August 2026 — 5,762 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,760 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,732 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,711 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,675 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,633 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,174 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,099 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,049 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,986 subscribers5 September 2026 — 5,934 subscribers5,9347 August 20265 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 29 days, net +172. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,552–6,255 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 17:175,934-52
2 Sept 2026, 03:475,986-63
29 Aug 2026, 17:346,049-50
26 Aug 2026, 17:136,099-75
23 Aug 2026, 07:136,174+541
20 Aug 2026, 04:085,633-42
16 Aug 2026, 17:535,675-36
13 Aug 2026, 08:155,711-21
10 Aug 2026, 14:545,732-28
7 Aug 2026, 15:085,760-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:025,762first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.1%
avg views ÷ 5,934 subscribers
Avg views / post
953
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held46 (3 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total24,770
Reactions total400
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

615 reactions across 46 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
36960.0%
👍15324.9%
🍓335.37%
🔥243.90%
❤‍🔥172.76%
🫡71.14%
👏40.65%
🐳30.488%
💅30.488%
😈20.325%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 615 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 02:57 UTC718 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

╭────༺❀ ༻────╮ ✦@fitplusgroup 🥗✦ ╰────༺❀ ༻────╯ ❕جهت ثبت نام دوره های فیت پلاس با @fitplusadmin در ارتباط باشید.

5🔥2

10 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC942 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

نظر همه قابل احترامه🥰 من خودم به شخصه طرفدار نچرال بودن به دور از هرگونه جراحی و تزریق ژل و.. هستم✓👌 بهتره به جای اینکه درگیر این موضوع باشیم که امروز چه چیزی ترند شده مراقب سلامتی و روش های پیشگیری باشیم تا درگیر بودن در مورد اینکه چطور به هررررر روشی که شده حتی در صورت آسیب زیاد، خودمون رو تغییر بدیم 😉

🍓20❤‍🔥63

10 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC934 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

من واقعا نمیفهمم این همه هیت داره؟؟؟ راجب بدن خودم سوال پرسیدم و خواستم مال خودمو تغییر بدم نه گفتم که هیپ دیپ نقصه نه چیز دیگه ای

👍144🫡2

10 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC952 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

کی تایین کرده عیب بدن چیه؟ وقتی خدا افریده پس حتما لازم بوده دیگه خوبه مد بشه کیسه صفرا اگه تو بدن باشه زشته همه برن عمل کنن بردارنش؟ از مقایسه خودتون با استاندارد هایی که معلوم نیست کی مشخص میکنه دست بردارین هرجور با خودتون حال میکنین بدنتونو بسازین..

🔥16❤‍🔥32

10 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC955 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://t.me/fitplusgroup/5225 در راستای این حرفم یه چیزی بگم اکثر چیزهایی که ما فکر می‌کنیم نقص به خاطر دیدن آدمای مدل و ... اس مثلاً ی آدم که تازه ورزش و شروع کرده نباید خودشو با آدمی که حداقل پنج ساله ورزش می‌کنه مقایسه کنه میتونه انگیزه بگیره که اونم ی بدن خفن بسازه ولی اگه براش حسرت میشه و باعث میشه تنبلی کنه و بزاره کنار به نظرم اصلا دیگ نگاه نکنه روی خودش متمرکز بمونه و اینم بدونه بدن هرکسی متفاوت من خودم ب

10

10 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC873 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

هیپ دیپ اتفاقا بنظرم نشونه زنانگیه خانوماس و خیلی ناناسه💕

15💅2🐳1

10 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC881 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

بعضی چیزایی که ما عیب میدونیم عیب نیست مثل هیپ دیپ شاید دیدگاهی که بقیه به ما تحمیل کردن نباید به خودمون تحمیل کنیم چرا اگه چیزی باشه که به بدن آسیب میرسونه باید در اسرع وقت درست بشه اما وقتی این نقص محسوب نمیشه چرا باید ناراحت باشی که داشته باشیش

12💅1

10 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC952 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

هیپ‌دیپ به فرورفتگی طبیعی بین استخوان لگن و قسمت بالای ران گفته میشه

❤‍🔥74😈1

10 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC944 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

همین الان دو تا اختلاف نظر داشتیم😇 نظر هرکسی متفاوته ولی ساختار بدن طوری هست که این قسمت از بدن فرورفتگی ای داره که برای هر شخص متفاوته، ممکنه بیشتر با کمتر باشه

12🫡2

10 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC972 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

چون دوست دارم حالم با خودم خوب باشه خوشم نمیاد از هیپ دیپ و هر کاری واسه کمتر دیده شدنش میکنم

9

10 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC944 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

هیپ دیپ اگه بدن خفن باشه جنبه زیبایی نداره؟

7👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @fitplusgroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐅𝐢𝐭 𝐏𝐥𝐮𝐬” (@fitplusgroup), 5,934 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fitplusgroup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.