Channel
@firstaccnael
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
42subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003163423626 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @firstaccnael |
| Created | 2 November 2025 â measured â dated from the channelâs first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/firstaccnael |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 42 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 42 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 2 November 2025 â the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelâs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramâs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ viewsâ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramâs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (2 November 2025 â 24 July 2026) |
| Views total | 7 |
| Reactions total | â |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface â not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than âcorrectingâ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form â 8.12K, 3.7M â so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded â read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramâs own channel header, read 10 August 2026 â not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramâs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel â not this channelâs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramâs own rounded chrome, so it carries no â mark.
112 reactions across 5 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5354835246057541832 | 22 | 19.6% | |
| custom 5355311682484718443 | 16 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5352535462869223898 | 13 | 11.6% | |
| custom 5354914260570886467 | 10 | 8.93% | |
| custom 6275995586613219472 | 10 | 8.93% | |
| custom 5354814411171185557 | 9 | 8.04% | |
| custom 5355166946381811697 | 9 | 8.04% | |
| custom 5355227415226369199 | 5 | 4.46% | |
| custom 6276217425969025502 | 5 | 4.46% | |
| custom 5354814668869224466 | 4 | 3.57% | |
| custom 5355018486542255717 | 4 | 3.57% | |
| custom 5355289928475365515 | 4 | 3.57% | |
| custom 5355287802466552990 | 1 | 0.893% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id â no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegramâs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities â ð is thanks in one channel and mourning in another â so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one â 4.34K, 1.2M â so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramâs own count on each post â not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above â those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by âa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageâ.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 2 November 2025 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars â bought with money â on a post by @firstaccnael. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 November 2025 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramâs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Capek urus ubot vps terus terusan?, atau capek seller ubot suka ngilang? Tinggalkan cara lama. Hadir dengan SyncTax-x.2, ubot panel generasi terbaru yang dirancang untuk stabilitas maksimal dan eksekusi secepat kilat. Cocok untuk Anda yang mengutamakan efisiensi di atas segalanya. Why SyncTax-x.2? â High-Speed Execution: Performa stabil, anti-lag, dan responsif. â All-in-One Control: Kelola grup, blacklist, hingga siâŠ
â¢â¢ âââââ ðŠ I like you who are so beautiful and charming â . . . ð I always hope to always be with you everything is always you ð€ main account @anaklowh @thejancukers ð main channel @information_nael @information_nael2 @naelsilence @firstaccnael â ïž If someone uses a name other than the one above, it is a clone.
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
ð« we would like to introduce our group, namely NAEMOND â€ïžâ𩹠administrator â @anaklowh visi-misi we build a brotherhood group for Telegram kids Hopefully in the future it will be useful for everyone
custom 53548144111711855575custom 62762174259690255023custom 53553116824847184432custom 53525354628692238981custom 53548146688692244661custom 53549142605708864671custom 53551669463818116971custom 53552899284753655151
ð¥ ððððð ð¥ ð¥ ð¿ðð ððððð ð¯ðððð ð¥ ððð ð©ž ðœðððŒðððð ðððð ð©ž âââââââââââââââ ð€ âðŸð ðððð ðð ððððððð, ððð ððððððð ðð ððð ðððð, ððð ððððððð ðð ðððð ðððð ððððð ðððð ð ðð ððððð ðŸð ð ð ððð ðððð ððððððððð, ððð ð ð ðð ððððð ððððððððððð. ðŸð ððððððð, ðð ððððð , ððð ðððð ððð ðððð ððððð ðð ðððððð. ð³ðððððð ðð ðððððð, ððð ðððððð. ð¹ðððððð ðð ðððððð , ððð ððððð. ð»ððð ðð ððð ðððð ð ðððððð â ððâð ððððð ðððð ððð ðððð ðððð ðððððð.â âââââââââââââ
custom 53548352460575418324custom 53549142605708864673custom 62759955866132194722custom 53525354628692238981custom 53548146688692244661custom 53551669463818116971custom 53553116824847184431
ââ ã¹ã¯ âïž ððððððððð ) ã ## ðÃðððððð . . . ââ ð«â¢â¢ âââââ A good friend is like a star; they are not always visible, but we know they are always there. They are the ones who hold our hands when the world feels like it's falling apart, who celebrate our successes as if they were their own happiness, and who honestly correct us when we start to step on the wrong path .ð. ââðð ð£ ð ð ðΣð, ðððððÎ. ð¥â£ â . . . A sinceâŠ
custom 53549142605708864676custom 53525354628692238985custom 53553116824847184433custom 53548144111711855572custom 53548352460575418322custom 53550184865422557172custom 53552274152263691992custom 53548146688692244661
Posted without readable text
ð ðªð²ð¹ð°ðŒðºð² ððŒ ð¡ð®ð²ð¹'ð ð ð®ð»ð®ðŽð²ðºð²ð»ð. ðð²ð¿ð² ðð² ðð¶ð¹ð¹ ðœð¿ðŒðð¶ð±ð² ð¶ð»ð³ðŒð¿ðºð®ðð¶ðŒð» ð¿ð²ðŽð®ð¿ð±ð¶ð»ðŽ ðŒðð¿ ðŽð¿ðŒððœ. ðð²ð¹ðŒð ð®ð¿ð² ððµð² ð»ð®ðºð²ð ðŒð³ ððµð² ðŽð¿ðŒððœð ððµð®ð ðð² ð¶ð»ð°ð¹ðð±ð² ð¶ð» ðºð®ð»ð®ðŽð²ðºð²ð»ð ðð² ðð®ð»ð ððŒ ðœð¿ðŒðð² ððŒ ððµð² worðd ððµð®ð ðð² ð®ð¿ð² ððŒððŽðµ ðœð²ðŒðœð¹ð² ð°ðŒðºð² ð¶ð» ð»ðŒð ððŒ ð±ð²ððð¿ðŒð, ð¯ðð ððŒ ð³ð¶ð»ð± ð³ð¿ð¶ð²ð»ð±ð ð®ð»ð± ð¯ð²ðð ð³ð¿ð¶ð²ð»ð±ð ðŒð¿ ð® ðŽð¶ð¿ð¹ð³ð¿ð¶ð²ð»ð± ðª
custom 53548352460575418329custom 53553116824847184435custom 53551669463818116974custom 62759955866132194723custom 53550184865422557172custom 62762174259690255022custom 53525354628692238981custom 53548146688692244661
ð°ð°ð°ð° ð
custom 53548352460575418327custom 53525354628692238985custom 53553116824847184435custom 62759955866132194725custom 53548144111711855572custom 53551669463818116972custom 53552274152263691992custom 53552899284753655151
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @firstaccnael. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked â was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it â t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so â1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions â Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank â 710,093 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below â republished posts weigh more than named mentions â and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelâs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page â a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel â every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched â that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayâs namer to yesterdayâs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason â naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides â the âNamed by N registered channelsâ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@firstaccnael named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleâs history â see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today â not that anything âdiedâ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel â we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 â this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
âð¡ððð'ðŠ ðð¥ððâ (@firstaccnael), 42 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/firstaccnael.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.