Channel
@finup_global
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
162subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002397083731 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @finup_global |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/finup_global |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 162 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 160 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 160 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (24 April 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 215 |
| Reactions total | 24 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
171 reactions across 14 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 53 | 31.0% | |
| ❤ | 28 | 16.4% | |
| ⚡ | 12 | 7.02% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 6.43% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 5.26% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 4.68% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 4.09% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 3.51% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 3.51% | |
| 🍓 | 5 | 2.92% | |
| 🍾 | 5 | 2.92% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 2.92% | |
| 🆒 | 4 | 2.34% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.75% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 1.75% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 1.17% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.585% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.585% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.585% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.585% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
How many clicks does it take to answer one finance question? 💰 Open the dashboard. Find the right cards. Export transactions. Filter the data. Build a report. Or… Ask your AI. Today we’re introducing Finup MCP — a bridge between Finup and AI agents like ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, Codex, and other MCP-compatible tools. Instead of digging through dashboards, you can simply ask: 👉🏼 “How much is left on this card?” 👉🏼 …
🔥7❤2💯2
Managing hundreds of cards shouldn’t feel like managing hundreds of cards 💙 That’s why we’ve redesigned the Finup Cards experience. Whether you’re paying for Meta, Google Ads, AWS, SaaS subscriptions, or managing expenses across your team, Finup helps you keep every card organized in one place. Here’s what’s new: 👀 Tags Organize cards by project, client, platform, campaign, or team. Find exactly what you need in …
⚡6🔥4❤3
A new Finup experience is here 🚀 We've rebuilt the platform from the ground up — updating the architecture, redesigning the interface, and rethinking the core workflows teams use every day. This release introduces a new analytics dashboard, redesigned card management with tags and advanced filters, a unified transactions page, expanded analytics, an updated team workspace, new security tools, dark mode, and many mo…
😍5❤3🔥3💘1
$33K+ AWS infrastructure payment processed through Finup. 🚀 As your business grows, so do your infrastructure costs. Cloud providers, SaaS subscriptions, and critical services need to be paid on time—every time. With Finup, large businesses can manage high-value payments without worrying about card limits, failed transactions, or operational bottlenecks. Issue virtual cards in minutes, control spending across teams…
🔥5❤4❤🔥3😍2
Finup is now 2× faster 🌍 Every second matters when you’re issuing cards, funding balances, managing teams, and keeping campaigns running. That’s why we’ve significantly improved Finup’s performance. Core platform actions now take up to 2× less time, making everyday workflows noticeably faster. Less waiting 👉🏼 more execution. Because payment infrastructure shouldn’t slow your business down — it should keep up with…
⚡6🔥2👌1
Different merchants have different payment requirements. Your cards should adapt to them 💳 With Finup, you get access to BINs both with and without 3DS. Need a faster checkout flow? Use BINs without manual confirmation and pay without additional steps. Working with a merchant that requires full 3DS authentication? Choose BINs with OTP and 3DS password verification. Pick the right card for the right merchant an…
🔥5❤2👍2👀1
Need to transfer a card to another team member? 🌏 In Finup, team card management is built directly into the platform. You can issue cards for employees, track all team cards in one place, and transfer cards between team members whenever needed — individually or in bulk. ✔️ Issue cards for any team member ✔️ View all team cards from a single workspace ✔️ Transfer cards together with their balance ✔️ Transfer cards …
❤🔥4❤2🦄2
London remains one of the key centers of the affiliate market 🇬🇧 For years ANS has been gathering top-quality people here. In 2026, the event will host 350 attendees - company owners, affiliate teams, advertisers, media buyers, and partner network representatives. A private networking dinner for VIP guests and a conversation-driven bar for everyone working in the industry and valuing quality business connections. …
🔥5❤1🤝1
Everyone in the affiliate industry has their own way of doing business 🌍 Some build their service around speed. Others prioritize a personal approach or maximum transparency. 🔥We spoke with Anna, Head of Client Relations at Finup, and Maria-Victoria, Co-owner of 2B Digital, about how they work with partners, which support standards they consider essential, and why communication often matters just as much as the pro…
🍓5❤🔥4❤2🔥2
Trying to use PayPal with your Finup card? Here’s the part most people find out too late 💸 Finup cards work perfectly for payments through PayPal: 👉🏼 online purchases 👉🏼 subscriptions 👉🏼 SaaS tools 👉🏼 services with PayPal Checkout You simply link your card to PayPal and use it as a payment method. ❗But there’s one important thing: you can’t top up your PayPal balance with a Finup card. PayPal doesn’t support walle…
🔥7❤4🆒4👍1💯1🤬1
750 000+ transactions have already been processed through Finup 💙 Behind every transaction is ad spend, infrastructure payments, team operations, and businesses scaling their day-to-day processes. We continue to expand Finup’s payment infrastructure so you can manage expenses more efficiently, issue cards for different workflows, and operate without unnecessary limitations. Thank you for choosing Finup for your op…
😱6🍾4❤2🔥2
Sometimes the final charged amount is higher than the price shown by the merchant 💸 Most often this happens because of FX and CB fees that depend on the payment currency and merchant geography. 📈 FX (Foreign Exchange Fee) appears when the transaction is processed in a currency different from the card currency. Since Finup cards operate in USD, payments in EUR, GBP, PLN, and other currencies may go through conversio…
✍6❤3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @finup_global. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,208,488 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Finup | Virtual Cards” (@finup_global), 162 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/finup_global.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.