Channel
@finseis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002482442252 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @finseis |
| Description | Превращаю гиперфиксации в картинки и скетчу разное в блокнотах. Финсайз, ну или Катерина, как угодно, так и зовите. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/finseis |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 7 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 7 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (26 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 66 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
21 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 95.2% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Быстрые фотки с пленера, называется, успей до дождя и до приема нарисовать по-максимуму. Кораблик с гидрометеостанции дома буду вырисовывать уже Также разблокирована ачивка "почти упала в болото" (я не люблю этот район города ещё больше). Немного зря взяла листы под гуашь, времени оказалось меньше, чем я изначально рассчитывала, но мне и так всё нравится, ещё и штаны высохли.
❤1
Сразу пачка отсканированного, пока не забыла. Первые три - к снотворцами: дракон Йорганд, характер средней говнистости, но сердце золотое во всех смыслах, просто картинка-самоподдержка с Тенсет и Ярагшат, и Нанна, старшая дочь, умница и красавица. Остальные - просто картинки без привязки к чему-нибудь. Искатель-ангелочек в пещере; мадмуазель морская, планировалась на мермай, но как видно, с планированием в этом году…
❤3
Обнаружила в папке с вырезками для коллажей артефакты 20го года. Что-то меняется, а что-то нет - акварель, вороны и рыжие девчонки. Оно такое, наивное немножко и очень умилительное, спустя столько лет.
🔥1
Картиночка на летний ивент в аск, я два месяца гоняла мысли по кругу, какая бы песня подошла к Катрели, и пришла к тому, что лучше, чем "Господин горных дорог" не ляжет ничто и никогда. Шаблон не мой, квадратная акварель моя, и немножко пошуршала на планшете листочки и травиночки
❤3
Сюда, вроде, тоже пока не показывала: рисовала Эмико на день рождения в аск, второму человеку не успела, эх (если картинка в целом как факт порадует человека - я стараюсь нарисовать эту картинку). Посчитала - эта штучка + 7 атак нарисовались за неделю валяния в больнице, полет нормальный. Пересканировала эти 7 штук, надо подраться с интернетом и подгрузить в альбомы в вк.
❤2
Картиночка на циферблат к Лугнасаду, ура, сезон любимых праздников начался. Очень хотелось какую-то нежность и закатное освещение порисовать.
❤3
Картери летняя, одна штука. О эти метания между "хочу рисовать и по этим, и по вторым, и по третьим историям/пейрингам, а ещё подружкам надо определенно кидать картинки с иллюстрированием очередного лордропа". А ещё в вк прогрузила летнюю активность👀 зря что ли до конца августа сижу дома и на даче с рисованием. И вроде успеваю все поддедлайновые штуки в аск, ура. #Warcraft
❤3
Атаки для LilyDei, CitrusSap и Armentarius (ревендж). Артфайт (и я) всё, сомневаюсь, что будут в последние дни атаки. В любом случае я довольна и финишем работ, и количеством, с учётом всех обстоятельств, почти в два раза больше, чем планировалось. И скетчбук удачный выбрала под это дело. Смеюсь со своего "я в режиме ревенджей - и пошла всех атаковать). Осталось собрать мозг в кучку и откомментировать то, что не от…
❤3
А ещё положу Тенсет на циферблат по Таро, по остаточному принципу мне выпала Умеренность, нормально. Склейки ещё не было, но я устала ждать опоздунов и выкладку. Зачем, спрашивается, делать дд для скетча и итоговый, отписываться, что скетч и работу сдал, если кто-то доносит результат спустя дня три, если не больше...?
❤2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @finseis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 789,745 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Драконье логово” (@finseis), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/finseis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.