⭐День, с которого началась история антиотмывочной системы 7 августа 2001 года был принят Федеральный закон № 115-ФЗ «О противодействии легализации (отмыванию) доходов, полученных преступным путем». Этот документ стал основой формирования российской системы противодействия легализации преступных доходов и финансированию терроризма. Енот Фини уже придумал, как отметить эту дату — надел тематическую футболку, чтобы в…

Channel
Школа межолимпиадной подготовки
@finolympschool
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
230subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002330662769 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @finolympschool |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/finolympschool |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 230 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 231 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 231 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 32.1%
- avg views ÷ 230 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 73.9
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.14%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (10 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 739 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
15 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5256012657076488800 | 5 | 33.3% | |
| custom 5206263170418629408 | 4 | 26.7% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 13.3% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 13.3% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Голосуйте
- РЕЙТИНГ14%
- РЕЕСТР64%
- РЕЗЕРВ9%
- РЕГЛАМЕНТ14%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Пятница — время размять извилины 🧩 Классический ребус. Зашифровано слово, без которого проверить любую организацию невозможно. Подсказка: запятые справа от изображения убирают буквы с конца слова. 📖Мы в ВКонтакте | MAX | Сайт Школы #финбезребус #шмп_финбез #финансоваябезопасность
Июльский блок «Финансирование терроризма» подошёл к концу. Тема тяжёлая, но вывод из неё простой и практичный: чтобы не оказаться в цепочке, достаточно знать правила и не отключать голову. Проверь себя. Восемь пунктов — если по каждому уверенное «да», месяц прошёл не зря 👇 ✅ Чек-лист «Не стань кошельком террориста» 1️⃣ Понимаю, что финансирование терроризма — это не только «перевод боевикам», но и сбор, транзит, м…
Помогать — нормально. Переводить не глядя — нет. Между добрым намерением и участием в чужой схеме стоит один навык: проверка получателя. Разбираем по шагам. 1️⃣ Кто на другом конце? У легального сбора есть лицо: конкретная организация или проверяемый человек. Анонимный аккаунт, ник вместо имени, «фонд без названия» — стоп-сигнал. Нельзя проверить, кому переводишь, — не переводи. 2️⃣ Куда идут деньги? Настоящий сб…
custom 52062631704186294082✍1👍1
Террористические организации решили, что криптовалюта — идеальный инструмент: анонимно, быстро, без банков. Они ошиблись. И эта история — лучшее доказательство, что блокчейн ничего не забывает 🔗 📢 Что произошло В августе 2020 года Минюст США объявил о крупнейшей в истории конфискации криптовалюты, связанной с терроризмом. Три запрещённые организации — ИГИЛ, «Аль-Каида» и боевое крыло ХАМАС — собирали пожертвования …
custom 52062631704186294082✍1custom 52560126570764888001
Когда говорят «финансовая разведка отследит», за этим стоит не одна организация, а трёхуровневая система. Разберём, кто на каком этаже — и почему перевод через границу не спасает. 📢FATF — глобальный уровень Группа разработки финансовых мер борьбы с отмыванием денег. Задаёт мировые стандарты противодействия отмыванию и финансированию терроризма — 40 рекомендаций, которым следует большинство стран. Важный факт: член…
Спрашивали, что не так с предложением «принимай донаты на карту, 10% твои». Правильный ответ — 🅲, соглашаться нельзя. Разбираем, во что на самом деле втягивали Лёшу ⬇️ ——— Это дропперство. Лёше предлагали стать транзитным звеном: его карта принимает чужие деньги и гонит их дальше. За процент. Ровно так вербуют дропперов — «денежных мулов». Проблема №1: он не знает, что за «проект». «Собираем донаты» — и всё. Куда…
Какое слово мы зашифровали?
- 🅰 ПЛАТЁЖ0%
- 🅱 ПЕРЕВОД96%
- 🅲 ДЕПОЗИТ0%
- 🅳 ТРАНЗАКЦИЯ4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Воскресенье — и один ребус на старте дня 🧩 Классический: два изображения складываются в одно слово. Именно это действие мы весь месяц учимся проверять, прежде чем совершить. 📖Мы в ВКонтакте | MAX | Сайт Школы #финбезребус #шмп_финбез #финансоваябезопасность
Самый частый камуфляж опасного сбора — жалость. И это не случайность, а точный психологический расчёт. Разбираемся, почему именно эмоция сострадания так удобна для манипуляции. 🧠 Эмпатия отключает анализ Когда мы видим чужую боль, включается быстрая эмоциональная реакция — раньше, чем рациональная проверка. Мозг спешит помочь, и на вопросы «кто это?», «куда пойдут деньги?», «а это вообще правда?» просто не остаётся…
custom 52560126570764888001
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @finolympschool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Голосуйте
- РЕЙТИНГ14%
- РЕЕСТР64%
- РЕЗЕРВ9%
- РЕГЛАМЕНТ14%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какое слово мы зашифровали?
- 🅰 ПЛАТЁЖ0%
- 🅱 ПЕРЕВОД96%
- 🅲 ДЕПОЗИТ0%
- 🅳 ТРАНЗАКЦИЯ4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Школа межолимпиадной подготовки” (@finolympschool), 230 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/finolympschool.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.