Channel
@fingersgpt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
420subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001647786187 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fingersgpt |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fingersgpt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 420 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 420 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 6 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
70 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 32.9% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 21.4% | |
| 😁 | 14 | 20.0% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 10.0% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 4.29% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 2.86% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.86% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.43% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.43% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.43% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.43% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2023 to 27 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ChatGPT – организатор новогодней вечеринки😎 Пока вы заняты закрытием всех важных дел и нерешенных задач в этом году, ChatGPT может подготовить для вас программу новогодней вечеринки. Он не только продумает все детали, но и пропишет конкурсы и игры для гостей 😃 Делимся промтом: «Я хочу, чтобы ты выступил в роли организатора новогодней вечеринки. Прежде чем что-то делать задай мне вопросы по локации проведения вече…
❤4👏2🔥2😁1
Друзья, а вдруг среди вас есть специалисты по ИИ, подписанные, просто чтобы быть в курсе «рынка»? Напишите, пожалуйста, в личку @elahwani — есть разговор/предложение 💛
😱Новый год уже через 11 дней! Как бы все успеть?! Даже в этом вопросе ChatGPT приходит мне на помощь. В этот раз я использовал его в качестве личного ассистента и попросил составить мне расписание всех задач, которые хочу успеть сделать до 30 декабря. Результат в карточках 👆 ChatGPT учел мой загруженный график и распеделил задачи в свободное время. Меня такое расписание вполне устраивает! Осталось только выполнить😁…
❤3🎉1👍1
Мой уровень p(doom)…
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Специалисты по искусственному интеллекту из Силиконовой долины обсуждают новую метрику: p(doom) — от «probability of doom», «вероятность <ужасного> конца». Эта метрика позволяет человеку сказать, во сколько процентов от 0 до 100 он оценивает вероятность того, что искусственный интеллект вскоре убьет всё человечество 🧐 p(doom) руководителя ИИ-компании Anthropic Дарио Амадея — 10-25%, уволившийся из Google ИИ-энтузиа…
🤯3🤩1
к слову, об искусственном интеллекте……
😁4❤1🤣1
ChatGPT тоже может лениться🤪 В последнее время некоторые из пользователей чата столкнулись с его отказом выполнять задачи. Например, одному из программистов ChatGPT вместо правильного ответа выдал описание того, что нужно сделать, и предложил пользователю закончить код самостоятельно. OpenAI уже ответила, что не вводила никаких изменений в работу чата с 11 ноября; он просто ленится. Компания работает над устранени…
😁9
Продажи блиц-курса В С Ё Дорогие читатели, на связи Алексей👋🏻 Продажи блиц-курса закрыты. Поздравляем всех, кто успел присоединиться🙌🏼 Завтра начинаем – доступ к курсу вам придет на email и в бота😉
А курс точно будет полезным? 45 минут и вы станете уверенным пользователем ChatGPT! В этом на практике убедились ученики 1-го потока: 🚀"Это просто потрясающий курс! Теперь с помощью ChatGPT быстрее пишу посты!" 🚀"Алексей объясняет все доступным языком" 🚀"Ну вот я и получила интересующие меня ответы! Очень просто о сложном. А ведь я несколько месяцев ломала себе голову!" А завтра, 10 декабря, мы закрываем продажи –…
🔥6
Наша подписчица верно подметила разницу 1️⃣текста, написанного ChatGPT и 2️⃣, написанного нашим копирайтером. Но не забывайте, что ChatGPT как верный ассистент работает по тому ТЗ, которое вы ему даете. Например, если вас не устроил стиль и тон текста, вы можете написать чату: «Теперь я хочу, чтобы ты выступил в роли опытного редактора. Перепиши этот текст в более лаконичном стиле, человеческим простым понятным язы…
❤4🔥1
Он пишет очень волшебно и воодушевлено с нотками мотивации. А человек пишет более практично, местами суховато и более привычно глазу.
Как заработать 2000 рублей за 15 секунд? Обещаем, никакие sms и регистрации не нужны! Всё что нужно - ChatGPT и правильно составленный запрос. Но давайте по порядку - в опросе выше верный ответ: Текст 1 сгенерирован ChatGPT🎉 А дальше следите за руками: ⁃ Время подготовки текста: ChatGPT написал его за 15 секунд, а копирайтер потратил бы от 30 минут до 2 часов (если он раньше не писал на эти темы). ⁃ Стоимость р…
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @fingersgpt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Мой уровень p(doom)…
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Итак,
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2023 to 27 December 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,056,205 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ChatGPT на пальцах | Нейросети” (@fingersgpt), 420 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fingersgpt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.