🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Здравствуйте дорогие гости и будущие участники мероприятия! Пока косплееры готовятся, а заявки заполняются... Мы тоже не сидим сложа руки! Совсем скоро начнут выходить посты, в которых вы чуть подробнее узнаете обо всех номинациях! А пока... Мы хотим объявить начало небольшого квеста-розыгрыша! 🐀 Цели: 🤩 270 (!) подписчиков на этом ТГК ( RAT fest ) 🤩 50 (!) подписчиков группы ВК 🤩 написать в комментарии о…

Channel
Чулан Фани
@finecosp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
63subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003200788389 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @finecosp |
| Description | Здесь иногда происходит разрыв логики, устойчивых понятий, а ну и косплей тоже ЛС: @fineatick |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/finecosp |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 63 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 63 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 117.7%
- avg views ÷ 63 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 74.2
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.78%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (5 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 445 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 161
- Videos
- 8
- Links
- 28
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
59 reactions across 10 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 32.2% | |
| custom 5456412064421518918 | 9 | 15.3% | |
| custom 5339296372208192371 | 7 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5422852439806077920 | 6 | 10.2% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 8.47% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 6.78% | |
| custom 5341639955472992070 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| custom 5341675844219719636 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| custom 5424994958471881206 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.69% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Кароче я сегодня отлетаю ребят, к сожалению.😀 Температура хоть и не много спала, но состояние особо не улучшилось и сил не прибавилось.🥰 Так что...всем хорошо развлечься сегодня на Недо🎮....покошмарю вас в следующий раз😏, сегодня так и быть отдыхайте🫸 (Если у кого-то будет желание и возможность, то буду рад увидеть ваши фото с сегодняшнего мероприятия под этим постом 😮)
💔3
В общем, ребят, я, как всегда, везунчик, — и у меня прям перед фестом поднялась температура. Надеюсь, что выкарабкаюсь. Буду уже утром смотреть на состояние. Press F мне получается...
💔2❤1
Анонс на NedoFest Ну что ж, пора напрячь свои старые кости. 😀 Завтра буду кошмать всех присутствующих с очаровательной 🏏Forsaken🏏. Если захотите сфотографироваться, придётся пожертвовать какую-то часть тела 😨 (Шучу) ((Или нет😀)) В любом случае буду рад всех увидеть 🥳 и покошмарить так, чтобы прям до чёртиков 😀 #Анонс #Косплей
❤4👻1custom 54228524398060779201
Да, я знаю что оставил вас без контента, простите пожалуйста, впереди несколько мероприятий, так что обещаю исправиться 🎅
custom 54564120644215189183
Я стал вампиром в 16 лет и я выгляжу всегда, как 16 лет... Вот и наступил мой день рождения. Было много всего классного, я встретила потрясающих людей, которые стали мне близки за этот год. Конечно были и плохие моменты, но черт с ними, они остались позади. Я и дальше буду стараться делать классные образы, пробовать что то новое, например поучаствую в ярмарке.я ведь ещё и художник, если кто то не знал. В общем хва…
❤3custom 53416758442197196362
Смотался сегодня на Scene Feat, в целом всё классно, примерил новый "Секретный образ" (Кто напишет в комментариях персонажа будет большой молодец 😀) Ну и по традиции прилагаю вам на оценочку не много фото 👀 Ph: 🍒Nota🍒 #Косплей
❤6🍓4custom 53392963722081923711
1) В косплей я ворвался чисто по рофлу, до того момента я никогда не думал что буду сам им заниматься, раньше я лишь наблюдал и считал это....чем то нишевым и непонятным 2) Я до сих пор в огромном шоке, что в косплее КРАЙНЕ мало парней и ОЧЕНЬ много девушек (Я думал градация будет ближе к 50 на 50) 3) Я очень хочу реализовать образ какого-то положительного персонажа, но пока на моём пути встают лишь злодеи (В той или…
❤3custom 53416399554729920702custom 54249949584718812062👀1custom 54564120644215189181
Зафиксировал, хоть и с маленьким опозданием (Сорян, забыл отписать), у меня получилось 8 Ждите 8 фактов )
Помню идея с интерактивами вам вроде понравилась, поэтому...запустил таймер ))
ИНТЕРАКТИВ ДЛЯ КОСПЛЕЕРОВ Сколько реакций наберется на этом посте в течение часа, столько фактов о себе в косплее должен рассказать автоp Забирать идею только репостом или отметкой
custom 53392963722081923716custom 54228524398060779205custom 54564120644215189185❤1
Неожиданно, ещё не много по интерактиву Clive Barker’s Undying Я сначала подумал что это сериал, и потом очень прифигел что это оказалась игра )) Так вот....колорит персонажей конечно очень необычный, и я думаю я бы хотел примреить образ Аарона Ковенанта Ибо давно уж есть желание перевоплотиться в персонажа в строгом костюме или просто выйти в люди в костюме 😮 #Интерактив
🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @finecosp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 902,661 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чулан Фани” (@finecosp), 63 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/finecosp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.