Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for finderfail

Channel

finderfail

@finderfail

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

65subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002036697180
TypeChannel
Username@finderfail
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/finderfail

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4571587 August 2026 — 45 subscribers10 August 2026 — 45 subscribers22 August 2026 — 46 subscribers7 September 2026 — 45 subscribers1 October 2026 — 71 subscribers12 October 2026 — 65 subscribers657 August 202612 October 2026
6 measurements spanning 66 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41–75 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 19:2665-6
1 Oct 2026, 08:3871+26
7 Sept 2026, 20:0145-1
22 Aug 2026, 09:0746+1
10 Aug 2026, 15:1645no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:0845first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

144 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤯8357.6%
custom 53888710279272948732517.4%
custom 5442714550426157926128.33%
🙏106.94%
custom 540433706772123650053.47%
custom 544506164697420561253.47%
custom 534127140432931798732.08%
custom 540471623602406175710.694%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 May 2026, 21:38 UTC147 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ДА Я БОЛЬШЕ НЕ СТРИМЛЮ. НО ЭТО НЕ ОЗНАЧАЕТ ЧТО Я ЗАМОЛЧУ. СОРИ НО НАДО БЫЛО ЗНАТЬ С КЕМ ИМЕЕТЕ ДЕЛО.

🤯6custom 53888710279272948731custom 54427145504261579261custom 54450616469742056121

12 May 2026, 21:37 UTC145 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

А ЕГОРИН ВООБЩЕ ЛЕВ. И ПОРОФЛИЛ С ЛУНЫ, И НА НОРМАЛЬНОЕ ОБЩЕНИЕ СНОВА ВЫШЛИ. ХОТЯ ПОСУТИ И СОЗДАЛ ПРОЕКТ МУНВЕЙ С НУЛЯ.

🤯5🙏1custom 53888710279272948731custom 54427145504261579261

12 May 2026, 21:33 UTC127 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ГОВОРЮ ЧТО ХОТЕЛ СКАЗАТЬ, АККАУНТ НИКТО НЕ ВЗЛОМАЛ. Я ВСЕ САМ ПИШУ.

🤯6🙏1custom 53888710279272948731custom 54427145504261579261

12 May 2026, 21:27 UTC120 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

А КАК ПОНЯТЬ ТО, ЧТО ПОСЛЕДНИЕ ПОЛГОДА ЖИЗНИ ПРОЕКТА У ВАС СТРЭМЕРЫ В ОСНОВНОМ С БОТАМИ СИДЕЛИ? НАСТОЛЬКО ВСЁ ПЛОХО БЫЛО? НАСТОЛЬКО НИКТО НЕ ЗАХОДИЛ? СОВСЕМ ПУСТО, ДА?

🤯4custom 54450616469742056122🙏1custom 53888710279272948731custom 54427145504261579261

12 May 2026, 21:24 UTC109 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ВСЕ МОИ ТВИЧ БАНЫ БЫЛИ ПОДСТАВНЫМИ. НИ ОДИН ЗА ПОСЛЕДНИЕ 3 ГОДА НЕ БЫЛ НАСТОЯЩИМ. НО ПРИ ЭТОМ Я СУММАРНО ПРОТОРЧАЛ В БАНЕ ГОДА 2? КАК ТАК ВООБЩЕ ПОЛУЧИЛОСЬ, ЛОЛ. ДОЛГО СТАРАЛИСЬ

🤯6custom 53888710279272948733custom 54427145504261579261

12 May 2026, 21:18 UTC97 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

FLESHTURBO ОТ ЧИТОВ И ПОСТОЯННЫХ ЗАЁБОВ ДО «ГЛАВНОГО РАЗРАБОТЧИКА» ПРОЕКТА. СМЕШНО, ЧЕСТНО. ЧЕЛОВЕК, КОТОРОГО РАНЬШЕ ВСЕ БАНИЛИ ЗА ТОКС И ЧИТЫ, В ИТОГЕ СТАЛ ОДНИМ ИЗ ОСНОВНЫХ. ЭТО ЛУЧШЕ ВСЕГО ПОКАЗЫВАЕТ, КАКОГО УРОВНЯ ЛЮДИ СОБРАЛИСЬ В ПРОЕКТЕ.

🤯5🙏2custom 53888710279272948731custom 54427145504261579261

12 May 2026, 21:15 UTC90 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

И САМОЕ ЖАЛКОЕ - ТЫ ЗАПРЕЩАЛА ЛЮДЯМ СО МНОЙ ОБЩАТЬСЯ. Я НАСТОЛЬКО СИЛЬНО ЛОМАЮ ТВОЮ КАРТИНКУ? УМНЫЕ ЛЮДИ ВСЁ РАВНО НАПИСАЛИ

🤯4custom 53412714043293179872custom 53888710279272948732🙏1custom 54427145504261579261

12 May 2026, 21:15 UTC87 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ПОТОМ НАБРАЛА НОВЫХ КОДЕРОВ ИЗ МОИХ ПОДПИСЧИКОВ И ИЗ ТЕХ, КОГО САМА ДВА ГОДА БАНИЛА И ОБСИРАЛА. ПРОЕКТ СНОВА ЗАГНИЛ. ГЛАВНЫЙ РАЗРАБОТЧИК ПОСЛЕ СМЕРТИ ПРОЕКТА ЕЩЁ ДВА МЕСЯЦА ОПЛАЧИВАЛ ХОСТИНГ ИЗ СВОЕГО КАРМАНА - ТЫ ЕМУ НИЧЕГО НЕ ВЕРНУЛА.

🤯6custom 53888710279272948731custom 54043370677212365001custom 54427145504261579261

12 May 2026, 21:14 UTC77 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Я ПИСАЛ ПРОЕКТ, ДЕЛАЛ ЛАУНЧЕР, ВСЁ ОБСЛУЖИВАЛ. КОГДА ПРИШЛО ВРЕМЯ ПЛАТИТЬ - ТЫ СКАЗАЛА «ДЕНЕГ НЕТ, БУДУ ДОЛЖНА СЛЕДУЮЩИЕ ДВА ГОДА». В ИТОГЕ ТЫ ТРАТИЛА ДЕНЬГИ НА КРОССОВКИ И ЖЕЛЕЗКИ ДЛЯ СЕБЯ, А ЛЮДЯМ ЗА РАБОТУ НЕ ПЛАТИЛА

🤯4custom 53888710279272948732custom 54043370677212365001custom 54427145504261579261custom 54450616469742056121

12 May 2026, 21:13 UTC136 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

LUNA_WZX ГЛАВНЫЙ ПРОВАЛ ЭТОГО ПРОЕКТА. СБЕЖАЛА ЗА МНОЙ ПОСЛЕ ССОРЫ С ЕГОРИНЫМ, ПОТОМУ ЧТО САМА ПРОЕКТ НЕ ВЫТЯНУЛА БЫ. ХОТЯ КАЗАЛОСЬ БЫ ХОТЕЛА ФУЛЛ КОНТРОЛИТЬ ПРОЕКТ xd ЛЕТО 2023 Я ТЕБЕ НАГНАЛ 20 ЧЕЛОВЕК ОНЛАЙН, ПОКА ТЫ СТРИМИЛА СВОЙ МУСОР.

🤯4🙏1custom 53888710279272948731custom 54427145504261579261custom 54450616469742056121

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @finderfail. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“finderfail” (@finderfail), 65 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/finderfail.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.