歡迎進來 狐狸洞 聊聊天哦。
Signed 小言
Channel
@finance_for_dummy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
769subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001901803971 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @finance_for_dummy |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/finance_for_dummy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 769 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:09 | 773 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 773 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 18 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
29 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 December 2025 to 5 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
歡迎進來 狐狸洞 聊聊天哦。
Signed 小言
即使在中國,「政策紅利」也是需要審慎看待的優勢。 中國政府一直非常支持可再生能源發展。太陽能電池製造商隆基綠能(601012),就得到過地方政府的低價土地、稅務減免,以及國有銀行的低息信貸。它也不負重托,成為全球市佔率最大的公司。 今年第一季,它交出19.2 億人民幣的虧損成績,連續三年的派息停止派發股息。至於這兩年來的股價表現,只能用『慘不忍睹』來形容。 別忘了點個紅心啊,上一篇也是。
❤9
Signed 小言
https://telegra.ph/%E5%BF%A0%E6%96%BC%E9%BB%A8%E5%92%8C%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%91-06-04
❤4
Signed 小言
https://telegra.ph/%E4%BA%A4%E6%98%93%E5%BE%97%E5%A4%AA%E6%85%A2%E4%BA%86-05-30
❤2
Signed 小言
ChatGPT選的: A股-2.03%,差於滬深300指數的-0.88%。 美股-3.44%,優於標普500指數的-3.59%。 (注意:WDC派發了每股0.125美金的股息,扣去10%股息稅,總共有 7*0.125*0.9 = 0.7875 元股息收入。)
❤3
Signed 小言
ChatGPT選的一周內A股 +2.47%,超過同期滬深300的 -1.07% 。 ChatGPT選的一周內美股 -12.50%,落後標普500指數的-2.02% 。
❤3
Signed 小言
小言金融研究 pinned «【Google Sheets】 我都把同一套腳本用於A股上,構建另一個資產組合,也值得看看。 【GitHub】 過程使用的腳本,有一點調整。»
【Google Sheets】 我都把同一套腳本用於A股上,構建另一個資產組合,也值得看看。 【GitHub】 過程使用的腳本,有一點調整。
❤1
Signed 小言
【讀者群】 評論區開放回來了。
❤3
Signed 小言
小言金融研究 pinned «【Google Sheets】 會顯示投資組合即時市值。(今日不是開市日,盈虧仍然是零。)»
【GitHub】 ChatGPT寫的腳本和所取用的資料。
Signed 小言
【Google Sheets】 會顯示投資組合即時市值。(今日不是開市日,盈虧仍然是零。)
Signed 小言
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @finance_for_dummy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,321,631 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小言金融研究” (@finance_for_dummy), 769 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/finance_for_dummy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.