Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Инна Филатова | Про семью и деньги от журналиста || АСФ

Channel

Инна Филатова | Про семью и деньги от журналиста || АСФ

@fin_family_journal

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

226subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001752896576
TypeChannel
Username@fin_family_journal
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fin_family_journal

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

221226223.56 August 2026 — 221 subscribers7 August 2026 — 221 subscribers14 August 2026 — 223 subscribers20 August 2026 — 224 subscribers26 August 2026 — 225 subscribers3 September 2026 — 224 subscribers12 September 2026 — 226 subscribers6 August 202612 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 220–227 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 07:59226+2
3 Sept 2026, 16:36224-1
26 Aug 2026, 19:03225+1
20 Aug 2026, 16:28224+1
14 Aug 2026, 08:27223+2
7 Aug 2026, 03:17221no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:22221first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣1920.2%
🔥1617.0%
❤1516.0%
👍1313.8%
😁1212.8%
💯66.38%
🎉44.26%
🤔44.26%
❤‍🔥33.19%
👏22.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.26%
1 of 19 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
71.0
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
45.0
over 17 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvACwNY116 July 202616 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC16 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Итоги 2-го квартала от ЦБ: мошенников стало меньше, но «средний чек» вырос Число операций без согласия клиентов снизилось на 7,5% (до 458,7 тыс.), а вот ущерб почти не изменился — 7,35 млрд ₽ (против 7,4 млрд кварталом ранее). В пересчёте на одну кражу: было 14,9 тыс. ₽, стало 16 тыс. ₽. ➡️Банки предотвратили 17,5 млн операций на 1,89 трлн ₽ — это на 4% больше, чем кварталом ранее. Три главные точки риска: 1️⃣СБП…

❤4

4 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC21 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Приглашаю вас на экскурсию от моих коллег «Московский финансовый код»! Экскурсия эта не простая, а оцененная высоким жюри! Она в июле победила в конкурсе «Бюджет для граждан» по городу Москве. Всего 2 часа в Замоскворечье. За это время через истории московских купцов, меценатов и предпринимателей посмотрите, как устроены ваши собственные финансовые установки: что мешает вам обращаться с деньгами осознанно, а что, н…

🔥3👍2

3 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC26 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

В Советской России в 1923 году чеканился золотой червонец с изображением на лицевой стороне... Кого?

  1. Доярки14%
  2. Двуглавого орла29%
  3. Троцкого14%
  4. Крестьянина-сеятеля43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC26 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Финансовый календарь с 03 по 09 августа Подборка ключевых событий, менявших экономику и финансы: 🇷🇺 3 августа 1998 года Первая публикация Бюджетного кодекса РФ Этот документ стал фундаментом всей бюджетной системы страны. Он установил единые правила игры для всех уровней власти: от федерации до муниципалитетов. Кодекс заложил принципы сбалансированности, эффективности и контроля за расходованием средств, регулируя…

🔥5

31 Jul 2026, 14:49 UTC33 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ох уж эта финансовая грамотность 😁Или когда думаешь, что зарабатываешь много денешкоффф, но вдруг оказывается, что нет 🤣

🤣5👍1

27 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC43 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Помните тот самый «волшебный кошелёк» из советского прошлого? Суть проста: открываешь, кладёшь купюру, и она... превращается в купюру большего номинала (ладно, это только в мечтах). А теперь по-честному: кладёте немного денег, переворачиваете кошелёк — и купюры уже под резинкой. Ещё одно движение — и они надёжно зафиксированы (смотрите видео). Чистая магия? Только ловкость рук, никакого обмана! Сделать такую вещицу…

❤3🔥3👏1

24 Jul 2026, 01:36 UTC57 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Да, возмутительно, конечно 😂С пятницей и прекрасных выходных 🤗

😁7👍4🤣3

22 Jul 2026, 05:49 UTC61 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Госдума приняла сразу три законопроекта, которые встраивают уже сложившиеся цифровые практики в классическое правовое поле: ▶️ Электронные кошельки — включаются в систему страхования вкладов. ▶️ Оформление кредитов — интегрируется в госсистему уведомлений через БКИ и «Госуслуги». ▶️ Криптовалюты — получают полноценную регуляторную инфраструктуру. Технический этап: законопроектам предстоит пройти Совет Федерации, по…

🔥2🤔2

21 Jul 2026, 05:18 UTCviews —

Инна Филатова | Про семью и деньги от журналиста || АСФ pinned a photo

21 Jul 2026, 05:18 UTC47 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Долгосрочного планирования в моем понимании больше нет! Давайте скажу про себя это вслух. Мне кажется, смысл загадывать далеко вперёд — исчез. Может, временно. А может, это системный слом: переход, пятая промышленная революция — называйте как хотите. ➡️И это не только про инвестиции, хотя про них — тоже. Я вот часто читаю — непонятно, куда вкладываться, всё зыбко, всё на время. У меня глобально — то же самое. На ко…

❤‍🔥3🔥3👏1

20 Jul 2026, 05:02 UTC45 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

И так Чемпионат мира по футболу закончился и пора дать правильный ответ на вопрос нашей викторины)) 1. Лев Яшин 22 мая 2018 года в преддверии проходившего в нашей стране чемпионата мира по футболу Банк России выпустил 100-рублевую памятную банкноту, выполненную из полимерных материалов. Взгляд изображенного на ней мальчика устремлен на застывшего в прыжке вратаря — Льва Яшина. Он стал единственным голкипером в ист…

❤3🎉2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fin_family_journal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTCAnonymous Poll7 voters

В Советской России в 1923 году чеканился золотой червонец с изображением на лицевой стороне... Кого?

  1. Доярки14%
  2. Двуглавого орла29%
  3. Троцкого14%
  4. Крестьянина-сеятеля43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Jul 2026, 11:01 UTCAnonymous Poll10 voters

На купюре номиналом 100 рублей, выпущенной Банком России в 2018 году, можно увидеть этого футболиста. Кого?

  1. Лев Яшин80%
  2. Федор Черенков0%
  3. Станислав Черчесов0%
  4. Игорь Акинфеев20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Инна Филатова | Про семью и деньги от журналиста || АСФ” (@fin_family_journal), 226 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fin_family_journal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.