Можно ли оставаться в Церкви и быть живым, быть собой и быть с Богом?
Как психология может помогать духовной жизни?
Обучаю, как помогать себе и другим.
https://filonik.ru
По вопросам сотрудничества https://t.me/Filonik_info_bot
Created
25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,950–7,963 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 12:26
7,951
-4
8 Aug 2026, 04:21
7,955
-6
7 Aug 2026, 04:32
7,961
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.2%
avg views ÷ 7,951 subscribers
Avg views / post
970
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
29 (27 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
27,146
Reactions total
1,339
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,910
Videos
≈773
Links
≈1,750
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
9m 11s
Average length
1m 01s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,339 reactions across 28 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
849
63.4%
🔥
216
16.1%
👍
170
12.7%
❤🔥
56
4.18%
👏
18
1.34%
💯
16
1.19%
🥰
9
0.672%
✍
5
0.373%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,339reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 28 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @filonikm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Кажется, что уж себя-то я точно знаю
Вот я. Я живу, работаю, общаюсь с людьми, принимаю решения, знаю, что умею и чего от меня ждут. Разве можно не знать самого себя?
А потом кто-нибудь спрашивает: «А чего ты хочешь?» - и все, ступор какой-то.
Вместо этого мы начинаем рассказывать, чего не хотим. Или что нам надо сделать, что будет правильно и лучше для всех.
И дело не в том, что у нас нет желаний. Просто мы так …
Друзья, а теперь - о том, что родилось из этого эксперимента и из многолетней практической работы.
Я знаю, как в непринятии себя страдаем мы сами и как это отражается на наших отношениях друг с другом. И как меняется жизнь человека, когда появляется свобода быть собой, право хотеть, принятие себя и других. Я вижу это у своих клиентов, у участников семинаров и курсов. Это всегда как маленькое чудо.
Именно поэтому эт…
Дорогие друзья!🍂
Предлагаю небольшой эксперимент. Прямо сейчас, не раздумывая, закончите для себя несколько фраз. Можно записать в заметках или просто подумать, можно - если захочется - написать в комментариях.
Вот они:
🟠Если другие узнают, какой я на самом деле…
🟠Когда меня спрашивают, чего я хочу, я…
🟠 Когда у меня есть возможность уделить время и внимание себе, сделать что-то для себя, я чувствую…
🟠 Если я думаю…
Или ещё другой эпизод, также рассказанный Антонием Сурожским в своих беседах.
Однажды к нему пришла молодая женщина, очень огорчённая, и «загробным» голосом сказала: «Я грешница». «Ну, это не новость, – бодро ответил ей митрополит, –Мы все тут грешники на земле». – «Да, но я особенно гнусная грешница», – настаивала молодая дама. «В чём же вы такая особенная», – удивился собеседник. «Когда я смотрю на себя в зеркало,…
ПРО БОРЬБУ И ПРИНЯТИЕ,
ПРО «УЖАС, ЧТО ЕСТЬ ВО МНЕ»
🗣️Оставьте все немощи, чтобы не узнал о них супротивный дух и не стал мучить вас, парализовывать и погружать в уныние.
Не делайте никаких усилий к тому, чтобы освободиться от них. Подвизайтесь со спокойствием и простотой, без нажима и напряжения.
Не говорите так: «Сейчас я заставлю себя молиться, чтобы стяжать любовь, стать хорошим и т. д.».
Это нехорошо – зажимат…
Дорогие друзья, это спонтанный ночной привет.
Хочу вам показать кое-кого очень дорогого мне человека из моей команды.
Когда вы пишете нам сообщения, пишите мне на наши адреса, то отвечаем обычно вам, отвечают вам два человека - либо я, либо Ирина Бабич.
И иногда нам пишут некоторые из вас, что ой-ой, а Ирина Бабич случайно не бот? Вот я отвечаю: это не бот.
- Друзья, если возникают какие-то вопросы, пишите, будем …
Друзья, короткая напоминалка про то, что открыта регистрация на бесплатный вебинар
"5 ошибок на пути принятия себя".
Приходите сами и зовите друзей🌸
⏰ КОГДА
20 августа в 20-00 по Москве. БЕСПЛАТНО
🖌Регистрация: https://filonik.ru/web/priniatie
Подробности - в посте:
https://t.me/filonikm/4760
«Да, Бог любит всех. Но меня… ну, не знаю»
Мы очень часто забываем одну вещь. Особенно в христианском контексте, как ни странно. Мы знаем, что Бог любит людей, каждый человек для Него драгоценен. Мы легко в это верим - когда речь о ком-то другом. А когда о нас самих - почему-то сразу "ну, не знаю".
И это «не знаю» становится основанием для того, чтобы не замечать свои нужды, не беречь себя. Жить так, будто моя жизн…
Если вы потеряли себя...
Когда ты находишься в неопределённости, ищешь себя и никак не можешь нащупать ответ на вопрос: «Кто я?», важно помнить, что работа идёт сразу в двух направлениях.
Я люблю говорить о движении по горизонтали и по вертикали.
👉Горизонталь - это психологическая работа.
👉Вертикаль - духовная.
И обе сейчас важны.
Если говорить про горизонталь, то здесь задача - делать всё, что помогает самоопред…
Мы не надгробные плиты
В современном мире нам продают образ идеально устойчивого человека. Скала. Монолит. Гром, молнии, извержение вулкана - а он стоит, и хоть бы хны. Прокачал психологию, духовно вырос - и теперь его ничего «не колышет».
Но, друзья, так не бывает.
Жизнь - это постоянные изменения. Потери, болезни, неопределённость, кризисы, конфликты. И если в такие моменты вам тревожно - с вами всё в порядке. П…
❤72🔥16👍9
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @filonikm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какие ошибки на пути принятия себя люди обычно допускают?
Нежелание сближаться с неприятным тебе человеком14%
Желание что-то изменить в себе25%
Позиция "я хуже всех", "другие лучше меня"59%
Привычка игнорировать свои потребности и желания77%
Умение нести ответственность за поступки11%
Избегание встречи со своими чувствами и эмоциями77%
Просьба о помощи в моменты усталости26%
Стремление реализовать амбиции и планы на будущее9%
Пренебрежние своим телом и здоровьем72%
Стремление быть удобным в отношениях81%
The shares total 451%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 285,898 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психолог Марина Филоник” (@filonikm), 7,951 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/filonikm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
