3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,555–8,563 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 13:27
8,562
+6
6 Aug 2026, 10:18
8,556
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:00
8,556
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.5%
avg views ÷ 8,562 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,870
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
16 (18 June 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
37,300
Reactions total
1,426
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
390
Videos
82
Links
159
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 44s
Average length
1m 22s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,866 reactions across 16 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,030
55.2%
🔥
270
14.5%
❤🔥
141
7.56%
👍
110
5.89%
💯
71
3.80%
💔
55
2.95%
😁
49
2.63%
🙏
21
1.13%
👏
18
0.965%
😭
14
0.75%
🥰
14
0.75%
🏆
10
0.536%
👀
8
0.429%
🍓
7
0.375%
🕊
7
0.375%
🤗
6
0.322%
👎
5
0.268%
🤔
5
0.268%
🤝
5
0.268%
⚡
4
0.214%
7 further kinds
16
0.857%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,866reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Был в Выборге на фестивале Российского Кино «Окно в Европу». Это особенный для меня фестиваль по ряду причин. Первый мой фестиваль вообще, на который я поехал осознанно зрителем (2011). Дважды мои фильмы отбирали для конкурса в Выборге (2023, 2025) и дважды они были отмечены наградами. В этом году я поехал не с фильмом, а с Аней, которую пригласили быть ведущей церемонии открытия, с чем она блестяще справилась. Попут…
Режиссерская фракция жюри «Актерской шапки» 07/09
Алексей Герман (председатель жюри) - создатель «Гарпастума», «Бумажного солдата», «Довлатова», «Воздуха» и других фильмов, обладатель европейского имени и международных наград, включая суперпрестижные венецианскую и берлинскую.
Антон Маслов — признанный хитмейкер, давший жизнь «Вампирам средней полосы» и дважды справедливо награжденный премией ТЭФИ за сериалы «ИП Пи…
ОТКРЫТЫЙ КАСТИНГ
7 сентября в Санкт-Петербурге состоится «Актерская Шапка» формат открытого кастинга подробности здесь
На фото Анна Котова, которую я впервые увидел на этом мероприятие в Питере
и потом еще раз уже в Москве
Аня супер. В нашей копилке есть уже одна работа на Басте,
классная запоминающаяся роль.
Будут еще 100%
Парень в шапке это Иван Федоровых, победитель Ярославской шапки. Ваня за малым не попал в Б…
КУРСЫ. Смотрю инсту и понять не могу, а на такое количество Актерских Курсов реально есть столько желающих? Преподают и готовят к поступлению все кому не лень. Не в коем случае не против того чтобы люди зарабатывали на передаче опыта и знаний, сейчас даже не вопрос к наличию педагогического таланта и навыка (так то это отдельная профессия). Что мы будем делать с таким количеством Актеров? Получая сегодня деньги за их…
«Я хотел тебе просто понравиться. И, как сумел, на гитаре сыграл» 🎤
Смотрите фильм «БАСТА. Начало игры» со Славой Копейкиным в кино с 24 декабря!
Как молодой Василий Вакуленко покорил ростовскую хип-хоп публику, а после — всю Россию? На фоне первой любви, дружбы и семейных испытаний он делает свой главный выбор — посвятить себя музыке.
В Выборг по традиции одним днем, но теперь не как участник,
а с мастер-классом (5 августа)
«Формулу Борьбы» начнем открывать в 11 утра на следующий день после открытия фестиваля, так, что попасть на мой МК это уже по факту боевик, криминальная драма и триллер
Что расскажу: как били морды во Вьетнаме с трюкачами Джеки Чана, как с Антон Кузнецовым (Дым из Юззза) катались в багажнике до Ростовской Кумжи
Как со Славой …
ЧТО-ТО НА НЕЖНОМ
Сколько раз я слышал от Актеров
в калуарах, не тет а тет, а в компании - «фильм говно».
Да в целом почему бы и нет, имеют право. Но не дай бог скажешь где, чувак ты на пробах лажанул, причем в шутку, не зло. Не был плох, а просто сыграл не то…с тобой перестают здороваться, лезешь выяснять причину, оказывается при всех нельзя и про коллег актеров нельзя, минус вайб…цеховая солидарность. Утипути. Все …
Сегодня что-то заскучал по товарищу, который без всякой веской причины просто перестал со мной общаться. И вроде уже лет 5 прошло, а все равно иной раз вспоминаю, вот как сегодня и грущу, а раньше злился. Товарищ мой АКТЕР, причем вполне неплохой, даже хороший, но толком у меня ничего не сыграл, так вышло. Говорили с ним об этом, больше шутили. Но в последнее время особенно часто, а потом он исчез, пропал, везде отпи…
Девушки милые. Актрисы. Посмотрите, как Елена Сафонова существует в простом сюжете на вечную тему женского счастья/несчастья. Между сменами, вагончиками и рилсами мы с Вами совершенно точно, что-то потеряли, надо это самое, «что-то» срочно вернуть как было
Прошу заметить существует не в самых удобных диалогах, на которые мы часто грешим в «новом» кино, при всем уважению к безусловному мастеру Владимиру Валуцкому.
Са…
Василий Борисович Ливанов
Шерлок Холмс всех времен и народов! Празднует сегодня 91 год рождения!
Старожилы моего канала знают, что я волею судеб имею честь работать на Ленфильме в кабинете режиссера советского сериала бэнгера конца 70ых начала 80ых - «Приключения Шерлока Холмса и Доктора Ватсона», Игоря Федоровича Масленникова и в принципе собрав большое количество сведений и даже артефактов, могу спокойно водить эк…
ЗАБЫЛ. Посещал Горький Фест
Нижний Новогород прекрасен. Пока Аня журила фестиваль, ел молодильные яблоки, пивал местный сидр и гулял с Женей Коряковским!!! Не разговаривали до этого четыре года, не ругались, нет, просто так нужно было обоим. Трогательно. Тепло.
Фильмов видел мало. Но и те не понял. Время идет, а молодые авторы продолжают выбирать истории про людей с ограниченными возможностями, тема сама по себе веч…
❤52🔥25👏2😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @films74. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ушел(а) из профессии, живу за счет другой деятельности4%
Жалею, что выбрал(а) эту профессию1%
Только начал (а) свой путь20%
Работаем, пыхтим, звезд с неба не хватаем, нормально30%
Посмотреть результат21%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 529,029 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Профпригодный режиссер” (@films74), 8,562 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/films74.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.