Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for فیلموسوفی نقد عمیق فیلم

Channel

فیلموسوفی نقد عمیق فیلم

@filmosophi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

502subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002027904029
TypeChannel
Username@filmosophi
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/filmosophi

Growth

5025085057 August 2026 — 508 subscribers8 August 2026 — 508 subscribers16 August 2026 — 505 subscribers24 August 2026 — 504 subscribers1 September 2026 — 502 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 25 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 501–509 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 08:54502-2
24 Aug 2026, 21:48504-1
16 Aug 2026, 15:24505-3
8 Aug 2026, 04:16508no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:39508first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.5%
avg views ÷ 502 subscribers
Avg views / post
73.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 December 20257 August 2026)
Views total73
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

77 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2633.8%
👍1722.1%
1418.2%
👌1114.3%
🆒911.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 December 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @filmosophi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 December 2025 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC73 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

فیلم بعدی سراغ چی بریم؟

  1. P (Aronofsky)44%
  2. Mortal Kombat 222%
  3. Arrival (Denis Villeneuve)44%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed مسیح

6 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC109 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

🔮نقد فلسفی فیلم پروژه هیل مری 🧿00:00 مقدمه 🧿00:55 اثر آخرالزمانیه و نگاه خاصی به منجی رو مطرح می‌کنه 🧿04:00 فیلمساز بُهت تنهایی انسان رو با موجودی خاص و ماورایی می‌شکونه 🧿08:24 مطرح شدن بحث هدف زندگی انسان. در این فیلم قرائت جدیدی از آسمان و تعالی رو نسبت به تفکرات فلسفی و دینی سنتی شاهد هستیم 🧿11:54 ریشه‌های سیاسی و نخبگانی بحث موجودات فضایی. مرکز رسمی که دولت امریکا در مورد فضایی‌ها راه انداخته: https://www.aa

🔥2👌1

Signed مسیح

5 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC123 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🧿عرض سلام و احترام، امیدوارم زندگیتون مملو از عشق باشه. خداروشکر بالاخره تونستم بر تنبلی مفرطی که دارم غلبه کنم (تا حدی البته :) ) و از این به بعد هر پنج شنبه با یک نقد فلسفی کوتاه در خدمتتون هستم 🧿 با توجه به نظرسنجی بالا، این هفته نقد فلسفی «پروژه‌ی هیل مری» رو می‌ریم و برای هفته بعد هم باز نظرسنجی می‌ذارم. می‌دونم بعضی از دوستان هم گیمرن و طالب نقد بازی، خودمم جدیدا توی این موضوع چند تا کتاب عالی رو فیش برداری کر

👌53👍2

Signed مسیح

15 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTC277 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

نقد جدید بریم سراغ چه اثری؟

  1. Mortal Kombat 231%
  2. Project Hail Mary56%
  3. The Ninth Gate33%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed مسیح

9 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC344 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

🔮نقد کوتاه فیلم وکیل مدافع شیطان 🧿در این صوت با بررسی چند سکانس مهم فیلم به سوال فلسفی اصلی وکیل مدافع شیطان پرداختیم: «آیا فیلم وکیل مدافع شیطان سیتنیسم رو تبلیغ می‌کنه یا به نقدش می‌پردازه؟» 🖌️فیلموسوفی نقد عمیق فیلم @Filmosophi

4👍1

Signed مسیح

9 Jul 2026, 10:41 UTC322 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🧿عرض ادب و احترام خدمت دوستان عزیز، امیدوارم حالتون خوب و قلبتون پر از عشق باشه. این چند وقت خیلی فکر کردم که در چه قالبی به نقد و بررسی فلسفی آثار بپردازیم، دیگه مقدار بحثای مفصل و طولانی زیاد کردیم 🧿بعد از مشورت و تامل زیاد به این نتیجه رسیدم که فعلا به «نقدِ فلسفیِ کوتاه» آثار بپردازیم. یعنی محور اصلی فلسفیش رو دربیاریم و به سکانس های مرتبطش اشاره کنیم. فیلم وکیل مدافع شیطان رو با همین رویکرد نقد کردم امیدوارم خو

🔥2

Signed مسیح

8 Jun 2026, 15:23 UTC441 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

🔮نقد انیمه‌ی Lord Of Mysteries 🧿00:00 مقدمه، عرض تسلیت در مورد وقایع اخیر و بحثی کوتاه در مورد ریشه‌ی مشکلات مملکت ما 🧿02:41 مروری بر روش نقد #فلسفی 🧿04:40 بررسی معرفت‌شناختی #انیمه 🧿05:56 بررسی نگاه اثر به انسان و #خدا 🧿08:19 جهان‌بینی لرد آف میستریز مبتنی بر #تاروت است و بررسی کارت The Fool 🧿11:00 بررسی سکانس‌هایی از انسان-خدای تاروتی در اثر 🧿13:24 هدف زندگی در انیمه ارباب رازها چیه و چطور می‌شه بهش رسید؟ 🧿

👍2🆒2

Signed مسیح

8 Jun 2026, 11:49 UTC363 viewsread 8 August 2026

🧿عرض سلام و احترام، نقد لرد آف میستریز تقریبا آماده‌ست و سعی کردم در قالب جدیدی مطلب رو عرض بکنم که هم کوتاه باشه و هم به مبانی فلسفی اثر بپردازم تا بتونیم آثار بیشتری رو در این قالب نقد کنیم 🧿خوشحال می‌شم بفرمایید قالب خوبیه یا مثلا پست (متن و عکس) هم به صورت مکمل بذاریم خوبه

Signed مسیح

31 May 2026, 10:54 UTC447 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🧿عرض سلام و ادب خدمت اعضای محترم امیدوارم هر جا هستین سالم و سلامت باشین و تسلیت عرض می‌کنم این وقایع تلخ رو، امیدوارم هزینه‌هایی که در این جنگ‌ها دادیم باعث بشه با تحولات عظیم فرهنگی و سیاسی و اقتصادی، به وضعیت مطلوب‌تری برسیم 🧿با وصل شدن نصفه نیمه‌ی نت منم بزودی نقدای فلسفی رو شروع می‌کنم، سه تا اثر از قبل مونده، وکیل مدافع شیطان و استرنجر تینگز و لرد آف میستریز. اینا رو بریم بعدش اگر اوضاع میزون بود می‌ریم سراغ آ

👍4🔥4👌1

Signed مسیح

26 Feb 2026, 14:13 UTC495 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🧿خیلی ممنون از دوستان؛ پس سعی می‌کنم تا چند روز آینده نقد فلسفی وکیل مدافع شیطان رو آماده کنم🌺 سعی می‌کنم استرنجر تینگز و لرد آف میستری رو هم در حد پست بپردازم 🧿تا اون موقع پیشنهاد می‌کنم این کتاب خوب رو یه نگاه بندازین، البته رده بندی سنی +۱۸ داره. در مورد تاریخ Satanic Films از زیرگونه‌های ژانر هراسه، خیلی جالبه، از ژرژ ملی یس شروع می‌کنه تا دو سه دهه‌ی پیش و نشون می‌ده چجوری از دهه‌ی شصت میلادی به بعد، رویکرد به

3

Signed مسیح

24 Feb 2026, 20:02 UTC429 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

عرض ادب و احترام خدمت اعضای محترم کانال. مشغول یه سری تحقیق و ترجمه در حوزه ادیان و ارتباطش با هنرهای جدید هستم، که خوب برای اولین باره بعضیاش به فارسی داره ترجمه می‌شه و مطالب جذابیه؛ از دین و اسطوره تا ویدئو گیم و انیمه. برای همین خیلی کم‌تر وقت دارم که به کانال برسم. خیلی لطف می‌کنین که توی کانال هستین و تنبلی منو زیر سیبیلی رد می‌کنین🌺 اما الان که می‌بینم یه سری که توی نظام شبه کمونیستی آموزش عالی ایران با پول د

🔥9👍2

Signed مسیح

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @filmosophi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTCAnonymous Poll27 voters

فیلم بعدی سراغ چی بریم؟

  1. P (Aronofsky)44%
  2. Mortal Kombat 222%
  3. Arrival (Denis Villeneuve)44%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTCAnonymous Poll36 voters

نقد جدید بریم سراغ چه اثری؟

  1. Mortal Kombat 231%
  2. Project Hail Mary56%
  3. The Ninth Gate33%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Feb 2026, 19:38 UTCAnonymous Poll56 voters

بریم سراغ کدوم اثر و نقد فلسفیش رو بحث کنیم؟

  1. فصل آخر استرنجر تینگز20%
  2. انیمه لرد آف میستری21%
  3. فیلم وکیل مدافع شیطان70%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Jan 2026, 08:57 UTCAnonymous Poll38 voters

عرض سلام و ادب. نقد آکیرا تموم شده به نظرم رسید یه جلسه آنلاین بذاریم روش گفت و گو کنیم، چون به شدت ترکیب فلسفه با سیاست رو نشون می‌ده و به نظرم برای امروزمون قابل بحثه. نظرتون رو بفرمایین اگر تعداد خوب بود جمعه شب آنلاین می‌ریم اگر نه صوتشو می‌ذارم🌺

  1. آنلاین شرکت می‌کنم (جمعه ۱۸)16%
  2. ضبطیشو گوش می‌دم :)61%
  3. آکیرا چیه اصلا؟!29%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 December 2025 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فیلموسوفی نقد عمیق فیلم” (@filmosophi), 502 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/filmosophi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.