Опубликован очередной рейтинг «лучших» фильмов с поправкой на то, что мнение редакции может не совпадать со зрительским. На этот раз The Hollywood Reporter выбрал 25 лучших документалок. Еще не открывая, сделала ставку и угадала: американцы люююбят Grizzly Man (2005) Вернера Херцога. 20е место. «Берлин: Симфония большого города» (1927) Вальтера Руттмана расположился сразу над «Гризли». Все логично, хотя немного и ле…

Channel
KINski
@filmkenner
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,104subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001473735357 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @filmkenner |
| Created | 11 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/filmkenner |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 2,104 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 2,107 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 2,104 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 2,103 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 2,103 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 13.5%
- avg views ÷ 2,104 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 285
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.01%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (26 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,135 |
| Reactions total | 125 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
214 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 78 | 36.4% | |
| 🔥 | 47 | 22.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 20 | 9.35% | |
| 🎉 | 15 | 7.01% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 5.61% | |
| 👀 | 11 | 5.14% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 3.74% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 3.27% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 2.80% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 1.87% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.935% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.467% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.467% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.467% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.467% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 214reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🥨 Не знаю, закладывался ли юмор, но я постоянно хихикала. Впрочем, я вообще часто смеюсь неуместно, по мнению соседних кресел. А на исповеди Пенелопе о падении Трои девушка в соседнем от меня кресле вообще рыдала. А вы говорите, что Нолан холодный и церебральный) 🥨 В начале фильма во флешбеках очень сумбурно проговорен, по-моему, самый главный тезис, который легко и проморгать: слепой наставник спрашивает Оди, зачем…
❤15💯2🔥2
Несколько нехитрых тезисов, бомбардировавших меня во время просмотра «Одиссеи» Нолана. Все обсуждают, я рыжая что ли) Наверное, ниже есть спойлеры: 🥨 Голливуд - отличная площадка для экранизации мифа. Актеры обычно выглядят возмутительно молодо, их возраст порой непонятен и даже кажется неуместным в разных фильмах. Ровно также и в мифах время условно, если начать сравнивать внешний вид и молодость, старость, таймлай…
❤6🔥2👏1
Выдвигаюсь на просмотр отпараллеленной, сверху-снизу порезанной, дублированной, затемненной (?), обхаянной версии “Одиссеи” в кинотеатр, не достойный задумки большого автора (да-да, у сэра Гения я уважаю только “Дюнкерк”). Если уж каждому суждено посмотреть “Оппенгеймера”, пусть это будет пеплум с Паттинсоном (🥖) в касте. Горькая актуальность сюжета в принципе понятна и до просмотра фильма. В многострадальной Герман…
🔥10
Кстати, о спорте: сегодня же 79-й день рождения самого известного австрийца в Голливуде — Арнольда Ш.! На фото Арни рядом со своей бронзовой скульптурой в его доме-музее! Даже не знала, что такой существует. А между тем, с 2011 года музей открыт в доме, на верхнем этаже которого Арни прожил до 19 лет. А еще в мае 2004-го открылась пешеходная тропа «Arnold Schwarzengger Wanderweg», позволяющая посетителям пройти по с…
❤7🏆7
Как только закончился мундиаль, осознала, что важнейший немецкий фильм про футбол — "Чудо Берна" (Das Wunder von Bern, 2003) я и не смотрела. Дорога ложка к обеду, но ждать еще 4 года не готова, так что вот: В то время как футболист Хельмут летом 1954 года отправляется в Швейцарию с национальной сборной на ЧМ по футболу, его “талисман”, 11-летний Маттиас, переживает несчастливое возвращение своего отца из русского п…
❤9
Польский постер к фильму Paris, Texas, 1984.
👀11
Мы ждали этой новости так долго! Марен Аде на финишной прямой в подготовке к съемкам своего нового фильма. Информация о сценарии “Волшебного слова” (пишет тоже сама) гуляли по сети еще с 2024-го, и вот проект получил гос финансирование. Правда, всего лишь 100 тыс евро. Хочется плоско пошутить, что продюсеры забыли добавить к заявке Das Zauberwort. В центре сюжета — мать, которая своим дерзким и анархичным поступком п…
👍6❤2
Понимаю девчонок, разве кто-то не влюблен в Орландо Блума? Каст восхитителен 🥖 https://t.me/kinodziga/5096
❤8💯2🔥1
Венецианский кинофестиваль объявил программу! В основном конкурсе — обиженный Каннами Вернер Херцог с давно ожидаемым игровым «Чертовым ублюдком». Вне конкурса — док Вима Вендерса о швейцарском архитекторе Петере Цумторе. 2-12 сентября наблюдаем во все глаза. Остальные участники смотра по ссылке. (Да, я тоже, увидев в списках «Дау», подумала, что обозналась и открыла статью 2020го…)
❤6💯4✍3
Даниэль Брюль — главный испанец в немецкой кино-сборной — абсолютно счастлив. А вы за кого болели?
🎉15😁4❤2
Посмотрела еще один прошлогодний фильм про WWII: Der Tiger (The Tank). Он шел в умеренном прокате в Европе, но на платформе Amazon Prime привлек некоторое общественное внимание и даже попал на 1-е место самых просматриваемых немецких фильмов в 28 странах. Причиной умеренной шумихи можно назвать этически неоднозначный для многих сюжет и сконфузивший многих финал. Хотя, по мне, ругаться на него нет смысла, весь спойлер…
❤9👍6🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @filmkenner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 693,054 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KINski” (@filmkenner), 2,104 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/filmkenner.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.