Channel
@fidoacademy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
469subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002515040278 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fidoacademy |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fidoacademy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 469 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 471 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 472 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 472 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (16 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,525 |
| Reactions total | 35 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
45 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 28 | 62.2% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 15.6% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 11.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 4.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤔 Bilasizmi, sun’iy intellekt bo‘yicha ilk ilmiy konferensiya bundan qariyb 70 yil avval — 1956-yilda AQShning Dartmut universitetida o‘tkazilgan? O‘shanda olimlar mashinalar inson kabi fikrlashni o‘rganishi mumkin degan g‘oyani ilgari surishgan. Oradan o‘nlab yillar o‘tdi va bugun sun’iy intellekt nafaqat ilmiy laboratoriyalarda, balki banklar, fintex kompaniyalari va yirik tashkilotlarning kundalik faoliyatida ham…
🤔 “Sun’iy intellekt” atamasi ilk bor qaysi yilda paydo bo‘lgan?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔷 Bugungi kunda banklar, marketpleyslar va mobil ilovalar har kuni millionlab ma'lumotlar bazasi so‘rovlarini qayta ishlaydi. Foydalanuvchilar esa buni faqat hammasi tez ishlayotganida sezmaydi. ➡️ Ammo bitta noto‘g‘ri optimallashtirilgan SQL so‘rovi butun tizim unumdorligiga ta'sir qilishi mumkin. Bu esa biznes jarayonlarining sekinlashishi va foydalanuvchi tajribasining yomonlashishiga olib keladi. 💡 Shu sababli …
❤2
💡 Bugungi kunda ma’lumotlar bilan ishlash uchun qaysi ko‘nikma eng muhim deb hisoblaysiz?
The shares total 210%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤖 Jahon iqtisodiy forumi ma'lumotlariga ko‘ra, sun'iy intellekt bilan ishlash ko‘nikmalari mehnat bozoridagi eng talabgir kompetensiyalardan biriga aylanmoqda. ➡️ Bugungi kunda kompaniyalar AI texnologiyalaridan biznes jarayonlarini avtomatlashtirish, ma'lumotlarni tahlil qilish va samarali qarorlar qabul qilishda keng foydalanmoqda. 💡 Biroq sun'iy intellektdan samarali foydalanish uchun uning ishlash tamoyillari, …
🎓 LinkedIn ma’lumotlariga ko‘ra, malakali mutaxassislarni topish va ularni kompaniyada ushlab qolish bugungi biznes uchun eng dolzarb vazifalardan biridir. Shu sababli HR jamoalarining rivojlanishiga investitsiya kiritish tobora muhim ahamiyat kasb etmoqda. ➡️ Zamonaviy HR mutaxassislari nafaqat bo‘sh ish o‘rinlarini to‘ldiradi, balki kuchli jamoalarni shakllantiradi, kompaniya madaniyatini rivojlantiradi va biznesn…
🔥4
🎁 Har qanday muvaffaqiyatli karyera birinchi qadamdan boshlanadi. Balki aynan bugun sizning navbatingizdir. QA Engineer — IT sohasiga kirish uchun eng ommabop yo‘nalishlardan biri. Test mutaxassislari dasturiy mahsulotlarning sifatini ta’minlaydi va foydalanuvchilar duch kelishi mumkin bo‘lgan xatolarni oldindan aniqlaydi. 🎉 4-avgustga qadar Fido-Biznes Academy QA Tester kursi uchun 50% chegirma yutib olish aksiyas…
👍4
🔐 Ko‘plab kiberhujumlar murakkab texnik vositalardan emas, balki oddiy insoniy xatolardan boshlanadi. Fishing xabariga ishonish, noma’lum havolani ochish yoki kuchsiz paroldan foydalanish tashkilot xavfsizligiga jiddiy zarar yetkazishi mumkin. Shu sababli bugungi kunda dunyoning ko‘plab kompaniyalari xodimlarning axborot xavfsizligi bo‘yicha xabardorligini oshirishga alohida e’tibor qaratmoqda. Xavfsizlik madaniyat…
👍3
🔐 Bundan o‘n yil avval shaxsiy ma’lumotlar oddiy axborot sifatida qaralardi. Bugungi kunda esa ular tashkilotlarning eng qimmatli raqamli aktivlaridan biriga aylandi. Har bir mobil ilovada ro‘yxatdan o‘tish, bank kartasini rasmiylashtirish yoki onlayn xarid qilish jarayonida shaxsiy ma’lumotlar qayta ishlanadi. Raqamli iqtisodiyot rivojlangani sari ularni himoya qilish talablari ham ortib bormoqda. Bugungi kunda sh…
📈 Islomiy moliya allaqachon tor yo‘nalish bo‘lishdan chiqdi. Bugungi kunda ushbu soha dunyoning 80 dan ortiq mamlakatida rivojlanmoqda va uning moliyaviy vositalaridan nafaqat islom banklari, balki yirik xalqaro moliya institutlari ham foydalanmoqda. Aynan shu mavzuga bag‘ishlangan strategik uchrashuv 16-iyul kuni Fido-Biznes Academy tomonidan tashkil etildi. Uchrashuv davomida bank sohasi vakillari, soha ekspertla…
❤3🔥3
🏦 1988-yilda Bazel bank nazorati qo‘mitasi Basel I kelishuvini qabul qildi. Uning asosiy maqsadi bank tizimini yanada barqaror qilish va moliyaviy xavflarni kamaytirish edi. Shundan buyon dunyo bo‘ylab banklarga qo‘yiladigan talablar muntazam ravishda takomillashib bormoqda. Bugungi kunda Markaziy bank talablariga rioya qilish nafaqat me’yoriy talab, balki bankning barqarorligi, risklarni boshqarish va mijozlar isho…
👍3
🤖 Eng muvaffaqiyatli AI loyihalari odatda texnologiya tufayli emas, balki sun’iy intellektni real biznes vazifalarini hal qilishda to‘g‘ri qo‘llay oladigan insonlar tufayli muvaffaqiyatga erishadi. Bugungi kunda AI moliya sohasining ajralmas qismiga aylanmoqda: firibgarlikni aniqlaydi, jarayonlarni avtomatlashtiradi, ma’lumotlarni tahlil qiladi va xizmatlarni yanada qulay qiladi. Ammo haqiqiy qiymat faqat texnologiy…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fidoacademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🤔 “Sun’iy intellekt” atamasi ilk bor qaysi yilda paydo bo‘lgan?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
💡 Bugungi kunda ma’lumotlar bilan ishlash uchun qaysi ko‘nikma eng muhim deb hisoblaysiz?
The shares total 210%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 112,883 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@fidoacademy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fido-Biznes Academy” (@fidoacademy), 469 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fidoacademy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.