Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 小宝封号主频道

Channel

小宝封号主频道

@fhxbi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

674subscribers

+365 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002532792299
TypeChannel
Username@fhxbi
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 September 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/fhxbi

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

309674491.58 September 2026 — 309 subscribers8 September 2026 — 309 subscribers11 September 2026 — 341 subscribers25 September 2026 — 447 subscribers6 October 2026 — 540 subscribers14 October 2026 — 594 subscribers20 October 2026 — 627 subscribers27 October 2026 — 674 subscribers8 September 202627 October 2026
8 measurements spanning 49 days, net +365. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 254–729 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Oct 2026, 13:56674+47
20 Oct 2026, 13:46627+33
14 Oct 2026, 03:38594+54
6 Oct 2026, 06:18540+93
25 Sept 2026, 11:37447+106
11 Sept 2026, 02:36341+32
8 Sept 2026, 20:22309no change
8 Sept 2026, 19:47309first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 27s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤990.0%
😭110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Sept 2026, 03:25 UTC86 viewsread 8 September 2026

网上朋友让你帮他扫自动售货机扣款后申请售后,原因就说, 帮朋友扫开后别人在面前扫,他以为开了扣的我的钱我朋友没有拿 商家看见后就会把购买视频链接发给你,这样你就能欣赏好朋友的大头了,仅试过支付宝其他平台自行尝试。

8 Sept 2026, 03:07 UTC260 viewsread 8 September 2026

和你们说个思路可以恶俗别人想不想知道想知道扣1

7 Sept 2026, 07:40 UTC130 viewsread 8 September 2026
Photo

你们这群恶意舆情恶意暴力勒索恶意攻击账号的全部等着被提交吧

6 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC103 viewsread 8 September 2026

垃圾二要素但是里面好像还有其他东西没注意看 #小程序://爱康国宾健康服务/vGV0awT5DfinhAg

6 Sept 2026, 06:58 UTC340 views3 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Video

谁还记得以前的我们 董香 奶龙 宇恒 情雨 古罗 旧址 行水 常胜 七七 泡沫 小鱼 法老 小夜 木乃伊 李易笙 鋭 海

❤2😭1

5 Sept 2026, 16:31 UTC114 views1 reactionsread 8 September 2026

老毕登解开一次打你一次喜欢跟你爹玩失踪

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fhxbi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“小宝封号主频道” (@fhxbi), 674 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fhxbi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.