Channel
@fgifkkmmmk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
253subscribers
+77 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004392270370 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fgifkkmmmk |
| Created | 31 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fgifkkmmmk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 253 | +76 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:31 | 177 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 177 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 176 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (31 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,814 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【老师艺名】：鑫鑫 【老师电报】：@XingXing6850 【验证留名】:X上岸练腹肌 【验证时间】：2026.8.6 【所在位置】：大亚湾 【上课课费】：1200PP 【是否代聊】：未确认 【颜值身材】：18，人照9分，漂亮的清纯妹妹，细枝结硕果，幼态萝莉脸，清纯文静风，笑起来还是那么好看，黄皮偏白无纹身（大腿根部两侧有手术疤痕），🐻B-浑圆，乳头小绿豆，乳头乳晕粉粉嫩嫩，敏感容易硬特好玩，160，42公斤左右，户型一线天毛量较少，内外好粉嫩，初下海如处女般紧致水多 【服务内容】：XCZ，🐍 【优点缺点】：幼态萝莉脸，高中校花级别，乖巧懂事，态度好姿势配合，初入极度紧致后期水超级多，皮肤嫩滑有弹性，缺点初下海无服务。 【推荐程度】：9 【个人发挥】： 净化灵魂，肉身忏悔 今天约了鑫鑫妹妹，君子需承诺必行，再次返场，见面鑫鑫还是如此可爱，甜美的笑容把我迷得五迷三道，抱着我的手在摇，哥哥哥哥叫不停，让我找不着北。…
【时间】：2026-08-06 【老师】：鑫鑫 【留名】：故事落幕 cheap man 【评价】：👍 好评 【人照】：9 【颜值】：9 【身材】：8 【服务】：8 【态度】：9 【环境】：8 【综合】：8.5 【过程】：竞拍半价中奖者，开开心心出击，没想到楼下罚站。 好o囹， 不过看到真人意想不到非常奈斯，就等于将功补过了。 身材160左右，苗条身材，入门看上去好清纯，🐻b 没纹身，又是个情种，手上有爱情象征刀疤🙈 嫩妹说刚下海，不知道真假， 唉！ 人挺不错还热情，由于半价3张搞定，由于约了宵夜局，赶紧🛀办正事，服务这方便还可以需要老司机调教，其余各方面还行，主打嫩，三点粉还挺紧。 该死！她说刚开始就被个巨无霸捅伤了一想就知道(腹肌哥到此一游)修养了 有一说一来到还是很紧致。 简单服务过后直接操盘，就像谢霆锋唱的歌。 前前后后左左右右，努力加速加速加速过程中顺利出水。 冲凉开开心心下楼去吃宵夜。 总结:嫩妹3点粉，有简单服…
❤1
所在城市：大亚湾 出击者名：🍟 老师名称：鑫鑫 上课价格：雷兵价 妹子年龄：20出头 妹子容貌：颜值可以 妹子身材：比较瘦 服务态度：中等毕竟是新嫩妹，很多都不懂 环境设备：环境可以 自由评论：下午看到曹总发的雷没人去，还是刚下海的嫩妹，找到曹总要联系方式沟通好时间出发，到了在楼下等一会，进门，妹子很腼腆，是非常腼腆的那种，交完水费就去洗澡，刚开始了正式的环节了，妹子很腼腆，口的也很认真，能一直口，只要你不喊停，每个老师不一定是非常完美的，都多多少少会有一点点缺点，缺点是🐻比较小其他还好，三个字，嫩嫩嫩，🐻部是粉的，水很多，我这种大屌，真的很难正面传教试，完全进不去，逼真的很紧，秒男去了几乎秒射，真的很紧！！！兄弟们，说再多也打动不了你们，只能说喜欢嫩妹的冲！ 综合评估：嫩，紧到一批 联系方式：@XingXing6850 手动报告模版
宝宝们💕我一直在等你们哦💕夜课还在哦😘
哥哥们上课咯💕🉑约啦💕夜课还在哦💕🉑上门
还有位哦💕🉑🈷️哦
满课哦💕哥哥们💕桩机别来桩我啦😭😭真的求你们了💕
哥哥们今天满课哦💕🉑约明天哦
哥哥们🉑约明天哦💕刚做很多不懂的希望哥哥们多教教我💕
刚下水哥哥们💕来的时候要对我温柔！别把我给桩跑啦😮💨
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @fgifkkmmmk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 863,444 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“鑫鑫的小🏠💕” (@fgifkkmmmk), 253 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fgifkkmmmk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.