Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🇹🇼台灣外送茶|小埋客評專區

Channel

🇹🇼台灣外送茶|小埋客評專區

@ffbd168

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

120subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002636306845
TypeChannel
Username@ffbd168
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ffbd168

Growth

1161201187 August 2026 — 116 subscribers8 August 2026 — 117 subscribers9 August 2026 — 117 subscribers14 August 2026 — 116 subscribers21 August 2026 — 120 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 14 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 115–121 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 15:36120+4
14 Aug 2026, 23:48116-1
9 Aug 2026, 05:00117no change
8 Aug 2026, 15:20117+1
7 Aug 2026, 17:33116first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.4%
avg views ÷ 120 subscribers
Avg views / post
30.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held11 (1 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total61
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC23 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#預約+1 每次看到哥哥願意相信我 就很有動力 🥹 我會認真了解每位哥哥的需求 盡力安排適合的選擇 謝謝信任 期待哥哥這次有個愉快的體驗 ❤️ @wjk9921

1 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC38 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#房號+1 嘻嘻 感謝哥哥的支持哦~ 8月收到的最美禮物~來自哥哥的房卡 🙂福利多多 優惠多多🙂 預約找小埋: ➡️Telegram: @wjk9921 ➡️Gleezy: wjk9921 😆茶單頻道 人生何其長 哪能只上一張床🌟

1

27 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTC57 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#房號+1 感謝哥哥深夜愛戴 半夜還來相會!深夜檔的熱情小埋全都收到囉~✨ 想要體驗最完美的舒壓旅程嗎?小埋給哥哥們一個小秘訣: 💡 最佳約會時間:晚上 01:00 點前(熱門妹妹都在 選項超級多!) 💡 熱門時段預約:提早告知小埋(搶先卡位 不用怕排隊~) 想約隨時私訊小埋 等你們喔!🥰

24 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC55 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

感謝哥哥的支持 # 性福+1 有些客人不用多說 一句「跟上次一樣的飯店」 就是對小埋最好的肯定😊 謝謝每一位願意再次找我們的朋友 也謝謝你們的信任與支持 每一次都希望帶給大家更好的體驗

23 Jul 2026, 06:50 UTC56 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#感謝+1 #感謝+2 #感謝+3 感謝大哥的支持與捧場🙏 下次消費半價優惠券 🎉 🟢價位不限🟢 可直接折抵 🟢 回流老客專屬福利 期待下次再為您服務 ❤️

18 Jul 2026, 06:35 UTC63 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#房號+1 感謝哥哥的誠意支持!! 🙏 這次的行程雖然一波三折(又是回頭拿錢、又是改時間的) 但哥哥一路上都非常有禮貌 溝通超積極 最後順利見到面真是太棒了!辛苦哥哥這麼奔波~ 小埋貼心提醒: 哥哥們如果不知道開哪家旅館更實惠 自己更方便 隨時都可以直接敲小埋詢問哦! 預約找小埋: ➡️Telegram: @wjk9921 ➡️Gleezy: wjk9921 😆茶單頻道 人生何其長 哪能只上一張床🌟

14 Jul 2026, 11:33 UTC60 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#房號+1 #幸福+1 房卡收到 祝玩得開心~ 熱門時段 還在猶豫的哥哥 敲小埋阿~ 預約找小埋: ➡️Telegram: @wjk9921 ➡️Gleezy: wjk9921 😆茶單頻道 人生何其長 哪能只上一張床🌟

12 Jul 2026, 11:43 UTC66 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#房號+1 #性福+1 這個月的哥哥都去哪裡啦~ 快來找小埋約妹呀~ww 預約找小埋: ➡️Telegram: @wjk9921 ➡️Gleezy: wjk9921 😆茶單頻道 人生何其長 哪能只上一張床🌟

5 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC73 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#預約+1 #性福+1 謝謝哥哥的捧場啦~ 性福生活即將開啟! 預約找小埋: ➡️Telegram: @wjk9921 ➡️Gleezy: wjk9921 😆茶單頻道 人生何其長 哪能只上一張床🌟

4 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC68 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#台北好評+1🩷 謝謝哥哥的捧場啦嘻嘻 約的紅牌妹妹 真的超滿意喔 做完立馬說想要回約!嘿嘿 妹妹外貿清純可愛 沒想到超級反差呢! 瘦且奶大~屁股大~ 選擇都是相互的~ 哥哥願意相信小埋 小埋也肯定會讓哥哥滿意捏! 預約找小埋: ➡️Telegram: @wjk9921 ➡️Gleezy: wjk9921 😆茶單頻道 人生何其長 哪能只上一張床🌟

1 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC60 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @bd1168Photo

#預約+1 謝謝哥哥的捧場惹 預約+1 最近超多新妹捏 想預約的哥哥可以衝衝衝啦! 素質安全有保障~

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ffbd168. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 101,432 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇹🇼台灣外送茶|小埋客評專區” (@ffbd168), 120 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ffbd168.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.