50 реакций под этот пост делаю розыгрыш на Фейм лист http://feym_1ist.t.me/ Чей рассыл будет самым большим тому отдаю лист, но перед этим 50 реакций
😈5

Channel
@feym_1ist
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
22subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003535256426 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @feym_1ist |
| Description | • Просьба не bлокировать данный канал Некоторые злоуmышлеnnuки mоgут пытаться злоупотребuть уязвиmостяmи систеmы, чтобы вызвать блокuровку данного канала. Ссылка: feym_1ist.t.me Переходник: @adapt26 |
| Created | 13 February 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/feym_1ist |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 22 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 22 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 13 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
75 reactions across 3 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5253922906378881072 | 25 | 33.3% | |
| custom 5465262274031659421 | 16 | 21.3% | |
| custom 5226928895189598791 | 13 | 17.3% | |
| custom 5415655814079723871 | 5 | 6.67% | |
| 😈 | 5 | 6.67% | |
| custom 5244837092042750681 | 3 | 4.00% | |
| custom 5449449325434266744 | 3 | 4.00% | |
| custom 5231200819986047254 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| custom 5443038326535759644 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| custom 5447410659077661506 | 1 | 1.33% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2026 to 6 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
50 реакций под этот пост делаю розыгрыш на Фейм лист http://feym_1ist.t.me/ Чей рассыл будет самым большим тому отдаю лист, но перед этим 50 реакций
😈5
Я ориг @tysewe не против того что @boguvoeu будет гонять с ликой "личный адвокат"
custom 54652622740316594211
❄️Всем привет, это фейм лист @boguvoeu 🔛Также вступление в фейм лист бесплатное, а ещё ставь в описание чтобы все понимали кто ты на самом деле! ‼️Что такое фейм лист? Фейм лист отвечает за то, какая личность чистая и феймовая, а какая личность бомжа/скамера/отброса 👑 - медийная личность, большой фейм. 🔥- большой фейм, довольно узнаваемая личность. ⚡ - средний фейм, чаще узнаваемая. ✔️ - между нн и средним …
custom 525392290637888107225custom 546526227403165942115custom 522692889518959879113custom 54156558140797238715custom 52448370920427506813custom 54494493254342667443custom 52312008199860472542custom 54430383265357596442
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @feym_1ist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,013,697 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@feym_1ist named 20 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“фейм лист” (@feym_1ist), 22 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feym_1ist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.