Channel
@fetemacabre
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
257subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001092827665 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fetemacabre |
| Description | Революция, героизм, мертвецы, праздники и другие интересные вещи by @arhat_lukum |
| Created | 26 October 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fetemacabre |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 257 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:41 | 257 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 258 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (16 May 2025 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,300 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
159 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 75 | 47.2% | |
| 🔥 | 69 | 43.4% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 6.92% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 1.26% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
в последний год молодой враль (то есть я) чуть меньше занимался академическими исследованиями и чуть больше - исследованиями неакадемическими и, не побоюсь этого слова, креативными, и вот настало время пожинать плоды! сегодня вышел первый том нашего многосерийного издания по истории, адресованный читателю от 12 лет. задумывался он изначально как учебник, но это, конечно, никакой не учебник. это нормальная свежая нау…
🔥17❤10
в древних недрах древних чатов откопала иллюстрацию из серии "модные прически после великой французской революции". модность конкретно этой красотки-термидорианки состоит, во-первых, в коротко остриженном затылке (чтобы волосы при гильотинировании не мешались), во-вторых, в открытой шее (те же цели). прическа «а ля виктим» вот тут можно прочитать пару слов об этом в каком-то французском блоге!
❤10
такое бы мне в мои аспирантские годы! ах, этот почерк черненьких шуточек в заголовках
🔥8😁2
давненько не было французского макабра. Робеспьер гильотинирует палача после того, как гильотинировал всю Францию. качество не супер, поэтому подписи читаются плоховато, но каждая гильотина заботливо помечена буковкой и снабжена пояснением, кто именно здесь окончил свои дни. всем хорошей недели!
❤7
Photo, posted without a caption
😁9
занимаюсь сейчас исследованием про эпистолярный жанр (проще говоря, переписки). в фокусе внимания одна конкретная пара, но, поскольку проект изначально не мой, период не мой, лошадь не моя и спросить особо не у кого, приходится зачерпывать экскаваторным ковшом всякое сопредельное, а потом просеивать. вот например прочитала кандидатскую, посвященную семейной переписке середины 19 века, главные действующие лица – отец…
еще к вопросу об упущенных академических возможностях: второй раз уже натыкаюсь на конкурс "лучшая кандидатская или магистерская про смерть и похоронные ритуалы", для работ, защищенных после 2020 года, и все бы ничего, но защита должна была пройти во французском университете. увы. а если это для вас, то подавайтесь, дедлайн 15 февраля!
🔥3🌚2
сегодня (два года спустя после защиты и больше восьми лет спустя с тех пор, как я начала заниматься темой советских похорон и всего такого) я узнала о существовании журнала Human Remains and Violence, который ну просто максимально в строку. был. был бы. эх. за всем не уследишь!
❤7
также вот
за несколько дней до Рождественского перемирия в декабре 1914 года лейтенант Чарльз Рут (Charles Rought) искал британских погибших на "ничьей земле" во Фландрии. хотя тогда нередко бывало так, что противники следовали логике Live and let live, Чарльзу не повезло, он слишком близко подошел к немецкому расположению и попал в плен. "Чарльз Рут провел остаток войны в немецком плену. Он был интересной личностью, в 1912 г…
❤8
фак е, вышла статья в Аспазии очередной долгострой, от конференции в сентябре 2021 до публикации в почти что ноябре 2025 прошло всего-то 50 месяцев. показательно, что за это время остроумное название невероятно устарело. это пока что моя любимая моя работа, хотя стиль и пришлось мощно подгонять под академический стандарт. там про дору воровскую, которой по жизни не везло, и конкордию самойлову с загадочной историей…
🔥12❤3
симпатичный обзор, и конкурсы интересные
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fetemacabre. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 286,910 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“записки молодого враля” (@fetemacabre), 257 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fetemacabre.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.