Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for fesand

Channel

fesand

@fesandee

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

55subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004411007658
TypeChannel
Username@fesandee
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 21 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 September 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fesandee

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

385546.510 August 2026 — 38 subscribers18 August 2026 — 46 subscribers25 August 2026 — 48 subscribers10 September 2026 — 50 subscribers11 September 2026 — 50 subscribers28 September 2026 — 55 subscribers10 August 202628 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 48 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35–58 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 01:5955+5
11 Sept 2026, 14:2350no change
10 Sept 2026, 19:0150+2
25 Aug 2026, 04:1648+2
18 Aug 2026, 02:3346+8
10 Aug 2026, 18:4538first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 21 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
154.9%
avg views ÷ 55 subscribers
Avg views / post
85.2
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held11 (21 August 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Views total426
Reactions total77
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Sept 2026, 14:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

141 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 50689171170892194582618.4%
custom 52648600491880760282618.4%
custom 52021612704925213392316.3%
🐳1510.6%
custom 5235563450196848999149.93%
custom 5235550861647704254117.80%
custom 506687137692149442674.96%
custom 529225472499149868764.26%
custom 520187146757422285053.55%
🕊53.55%
custom 519976169803405119232.13%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 141 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Sept 2026, 18:32 UTC66 views17 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Я в восторге #осминимуз

custom 50689171170892194588custom 50668713769214944263🐳1custom 52018714675742228501custom 52355508616477042541custom 52355634501968489991custom 52648600491880760281custom 52922547249914986871

8 Sept 2026, 18:55 UTC44 views20 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Пр На 1 лень зрачки делать, 2 немного новый метод покраса использовала #осминимуз #хзчтоэто

custom 52648600491880760289custom 52021612704925213394custom 50689171170892194583custom 52922547249914986872custom 50668713769214944261custom 52018714675742228501

5 Sept 2026, 19:27 UTC134 views19 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Рисую рисую Балдею от рендера, она такой конфеткой выходит #процесс #модель

custom 526486004918807602810custom 52021612704925213393custom 52355634501968489993custom 50668713769214944261custom 52355508616477042541custom 52922547249914986871

4 Sept 2026, 16:06 UTC83 views5 reactionsread 11 September 2026

Привет, если что У меня нет абсолютно НИКАКИХ ботов и приватных каналов!! Пожалуйста, если что-то видите подобные, не ведитесь ок🍂 Целую люблю всех обожаю #важно

custom 52021612704925213395

3 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC99 views16 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Перезалью чуть-чуть Неомнб, показывала ли вам чибика или не ❤️ #процесс #модель #скетч

🐳7🕊1custom 50668713769214944261custom 50689171170892194581custom 51997616980340511921custom 52018714675742228501custom 52021612704925213391custom 52355508616477042541

30 Aug 2026, 02:42 UTC142 views21 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ Я сегодня согрешила 1 для себя, 2 для КОЕ-ЧЕГО другого🤗 Даже в ресте рисовала бред😐, но зато у меня даже появился свой стиль? типа???😔😔 #скетч #процесс

custom 50689171170892194589🕊4custom 52021612704925213392🐳1custom 50668713769214944261custom 52018714675742228501custom 52355508616477042541custom 52355634501968489991

29 Aug 2026, 01:40 UTC95 views6 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Forwarded from @nekomevPhoto

💘🎀🌟🌟🔤🌟🌟🌟🌟🔤🐾 🌟😀😀😀😀😀😀😀🤩 🤩подписка на мой канал:3 🤩пересыл поста в тгк/пиар чат💃 Вы можете получить от меня халявный редизайн в гл2/скетч/полноценку!!! Выбираю персонажей на свое усмотрение, без дедлайна. Скидывайте своих персонажей и пруфы репоста в комментариях, всех жду ^_^ 🎀

custom 50689171170892194584custom 51997616980340511921custom 52648600491880760281

29 Aug 2026, 01:34 UTC92 views1 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Forwarded from @tkeshikPhoto

#арт с Йоном — Тут смысл кстати не в том что он просто выделился, а то что миру совершенно все равно и еще на руки его гляньте 👉 P.s. некое вдохновение мне принесла песня Hero из "слабый герой" поэтому собираюсь сделать под неё +- анимацию либо просто спидпейнт 🥶 И на заднем фоне такие некие персонажи как: Душка, Фесанд, GADNHA, Гречка

🐳1

23 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTCviews —4 reactionsread 11 September 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52648600491880760282custom 52355508616477042541custom 52355634501968489991

21 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC138 views14 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Приветтт Вот и коллаба с Инфузией да Ставки сюда #осгл2

🐳5custom 52355634501968489994custom 52355508616477042542custom 50689171170892194581custom 51997616980340511921custom 52021612704925213391

21 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC163 views18 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

. #осгл2 #многослотка

custom 52021612704925213397custom 52355508616477042544custom 52355634501968489994custom 52018714675742228501custom 52648600491880760281custom 52922547249914986871

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @fesandee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“fesand” (@fesandee), 55 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fesandee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.