Need bf buat onty saya Muse bebas yang berminat silahkan ke kamar nya @Gisheldra_z

Channel
π ππ«π³π ππ₯π³ππ«π’ππ§
@ferza_alzerian_14
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Posts Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003813029060 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ferza_alzerian_14 |
| Description | Ini bukan ch pribadi cuma khusus posting aja |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ferza_alzerian_14 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:23 | 1 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:47 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 9706.3%
- avg views Γ· 1 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 97.1
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- β
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 15 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 August 2026 β 15 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,553 |
| Reactions total | β |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Sept 2026, 20:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 5
- Videos
- 41
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 17 September 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 4m 36s
- Average length
- 17s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Recent posts
Ajak jalan jalan si cantik @Vell_InaJk
Sayang @Vell_InaJk kamu adalah wanita yang ku pilih sampai kapan pun aku selalu ada di samping kamu dan aku selalu menjaga kamu
Selamat siang alll #ferza_alzerian
JJ bareng @Ethan_Xavi
Selamat siang all jangan lupa makan siang #ferza_alzerian
Kamu adalah wanita yang ferza pilih kamu adalah matahari yang paling indah bagi ferza ferza berjanji akan selalu menjaga mu ferza akan selalu di samping mu love you sayang @Vell_InaJk
JJ bareng adek kesayangan ferza @Punya_reyvin and @Cwekcabby
Jalan jalan bareng mama @Piscess_queen20
JJ bareng Abang @CrocodileCode dan nuna @Yuki_zora
Second Muse
JJ bareng onty @Gisheldra_z
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ferza_alzerian_14. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 5
- handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 5
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ferza_alzerian_14 named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 18 September 2026 β 18 September 2026
named in 1 post, 18 September 2026 β 18 September 2026
named in 1 post, 18 September 2026 β 18 September 2026
named in 1 post, 18 September 2026 β 18 September 2026
named in 1 post, 18 September 2026 β 18 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ ππ«π³π ππ₯π³ππ«π’ππ§β (@ferza_alzerian_14), 1 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ferza_alzerian_14.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.