Channel
@femme_toxique
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
262subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001951299554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @femme_toxique |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/femme_toxique |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 262 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 264 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 263 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 265 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 266 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 266 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
407 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 140 | 34.4% | |
| ❤ | 135 | 33.2% | |
| 🔥 | 83 | 20.4% | |
| 😢 | 16 | 3.93% | |
| 🤣 | 14 | 3.44% | |
| 😈 | 6 | 1.47% | |
| custom 5253715317724554776 | 4 | 0.983% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.983% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 0.737% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.246% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.246% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 407 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 28 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Северус неосознанно погладил пальцами нашивку с изображением красного дракона Камелота на своем предплечье, наблюдая за ней. Сырой холод сквозил сквозь щели в деревянных стенах замка, смешиваясь с запахом очага и увядающих трав. Она аккуратно нарезала растения, а затем раскладывала их на белой ткани охапками. Каштановые волосы, собранные в высокий хвост, норовили выскочить, непослушные локоны выбивались из прически, …
🔥23❤3
когда я пересмотрю дорам, то никому не скажу, но будут знаки...
— На самом деле это так странно: с одной стороны мне хочется быть с ним рядом, но с другой — я не чувствую, что это правильно, понимаешь? Северус лишь закатил глаза: Грейнджер была бы идеальной помощницей при изготовлении сложных зелий, если бы не её щебетание. Он смирился с тем, что знал весь её распорядок дня, как дела её друзей, даже планы на будущее. Более того — ему это было интересно. Но слушать про ее тупые, …
🔥26❤13🥰4😈1
Спасибо ИИ, две любимые вселенные схлопнулись Парни из ГП как корейские айдолы Драко вообще вписался как родной🥺
😁7🔥4
Я человек простой: увидела, как Джон Траволта выглядит в 72 ➖ быстренько записалась к косметологу
😁5
Я в январе: ну вообще те, кто угорает по азиатам, немножко странные. Но я, конечно, посмотрю 1 дораму, ничего не будет Я в мае: 一阴一阳之谓道 紫气东来 неиронично в шаге от дорамного снейджера😳
😁15🤣6🔥1
Была сегодня в деревне у родственников: ели мясо, гуляли, снова ели, снова бегали с собакой Никто ни разу не спросил, когда замуж, когда рожу, почему потолстела, сколько зарабатываю Решила общаться с ними почаще😁
❤22😁6
Всем говорю, что легко отличу ИИ от не ИИ Только спустя полтора месяца кайфования с песен Лолиты Черчел узнала, что это румынская ИИ-певица
😁13🤣1
Уже больше недели кошачий мяв будит меня в 4 утра Торг, отрицание, депрессия прошли, и я на стадии принятия встаю, выпускаю Рысю гулять и иду досыпать Сегодня оказалось, что соседка в это время доит корову, а Рысе там перепадает парного молочка Маленькие манипуляторы всю деревню поставили на бартер🤦♀️
❤21😁9
Капец меня жмыхнуло, хочется штукатурить стены, класть плитку и отдетейлить наши машины вручную В 19 лет: учишься управлению проектами и коммуникациям В 28 лет учишься класть плитку
🔥10🤣5❤3
Ингредиенты для зелий подвезли😐
😁16🌚3😍1
конечно меня не привлекают эротические фанфики с элементами сами знаете чего и магии😇 это коварная нейросеть меня оговорила
❤10🤣2😈2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @femme_toxique. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🍾 Toxinue 🍾” (@femme_toxique), 262 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/femme_toxique.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.