2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 112–114 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 06:31
113
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:16
113
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 18 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
624.8%
avg views ÷ 113 subscribers
Avg views / post
706
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.425%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held
18 (18 November 2025 – 1 August 2026)
Views total
706
Reactions total
3
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
18
Links
15
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
67 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
23
34.3%
❤🔥
21
31.3%
🔥
19
28.4%
🍓
1
1.49%
🍾
1
1.49%
👍
1
1.49%
🙏
1
1.49%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ja, ihr habt länger darauf gewartet - we sowwy! Unser Postfach quillt vor euren lieben Anfragen über und darüber freuen wir uns sehr! Das nächste fem*vak Netzwerktreffen findet statt am Fr, 07.08. um 19Uhr im elipamanoke!
Du bist DJ, VJ, Producer*in, Techniker*in, Grafiker*in, Teil eines Clubs/Kollektivs oder einfach gerne auf Events unterwegs?
Dann komm vorbei und vernetze dich mit anderen großartigen FLINTA*! Ler…
HEUTE sind wir im eli und wir laden euch ein, mit uns an die Open Decks zu kommen!
Clubkultur ist politisch. Wer hinter den Decks steht, ist kein Zufall.
Im CSD-Monat wird das nochmal deutlicher: Sichtbarkeit ist kein Selbstläufer, sondern etwas, das wir gemeinsam erkämpfen. Was auf der Straße laut wird, tragen wir auf den Floor.
Auf dem oberen Floor bekommen FLINTA*s den Raum, sich an den Open Decks zu 2000er, Pop…
Die Worten der Organisator*innen zum Frauen*FLINTA* Festival:
Es gibt kein Zurück! Keine Zukunft ohne uns!
Warum ein Leipziger Frauen*FLINTA*Festival 2026?
Wir schließen uns zusammen und kämpfen für eine gerechte Zukunft! Wir stellen uns gegen alle Formen patriarchaler Gewalt und gegen jede Art von Diskriminierung aufgrund von Geschlecht, Herkunft, Alter und sozioökonomischem Status.
Unser Ziel ist es: Gewalt zu übe…
Schaut heute bei unserem fem*vak Infostand beim Frauen*FLINTA* Festival vorbei! Wo? Marktplatz Leipzig. Wann? 30/05 14-22 Uhr.
Lexi & JoJo (aka itsadisasta) engagieren sich bei fem*vak. Beide kennen die Realität hinter den Kulissen von Club- und Subkulturarbeit — von fehlender Wertschätzung bis hin zu unzureichenden Arbeitsbedingungen, besonders gegenüber FLINTA* & Queers die die Care Arbeit machen, damit diese Stru…
🦺 dringend noch Ordner*innen gesucht 🦺
Für die GSO am 6.6.26 suchen wir noch ein paar Ordner*innen für unseren Wagen. Wenn du Bock hast direkt am Wagen mit zu laufen und uns zu supporten, melde dich gerne unter folgendem Link an: https://tally.so/r/ob7d7e
(bei dem Link unseren Wagen fem*vak x Sachsentrance angeben)
💜 Tausend Dank und ganz viel Liebe 💜
Heute! 25.04. ab 16:00 - Für Folge #02 wird fem*voc zur Live-Radioshow bei Sphere Radio ( @sphere.radio // sphere-radio.net )
Schaltet ein und seid dabei, wenn das Gespräch in Echtzeit stattfindet. Die Sendung wird aufgezeichnet und ist im Anschluss auf SoundCloud (fem*vak) sowie auf der Website von sphere radio zum Nachhören verfügbar.
In dieser Folge sprechen Camilla & Fanny mit Karo aka UNTENLINKS (fem*vak) über…
Bei unserer letzten fem*vak: Raving Against Patriarchy! im Eli entstanden wundervolle sets die jetzt online auf unserem soundcloud zu finden sind. Viel Genuss beim hören der Sets!
Playlist
dj clitbait
kimchi cora
DJ Luiser
genelle
Filosofi b2b Souphlé
DELIKAT
Wir freuen uns schon auf die nächste Party mit euch 💜✨
Spontanes Netzwerktreffen
HEUTE, Freitag den 13.03.26 um 17:00 - 19:00 Uhr - kommt vorbei!
FLINTA* & QUEERS only 🌈💅✨🪩🌞💕 Im Anschluss gibt es lecker Küfa 😋
@korner56_ Konradstraße 56, 04315 Leipzig.
fem*vak presents: Raving Against Patriarchy!
Ja, das Patriarchat ist immer noch da – aber wir auch und wir raven weiter dagegen an. Freitag im Club, Sonntag auf der Straße!
Wir kommen im Elipamanoke zusammen zu einem Demo-Warm-up auf zwei Floors mit proggy House, groovigem Techno und treibendem Trance – und schaffen Raum für Widerstand, Freude und kollektive Power. Wie immer könnt ihr euch auf besondere Aktivitäten …
Komm zu unserer feministischen FLINTA*-Kampfkunstgruppe! Keine Vorkenntnisse nötig.
Immer Donnerstags 20:15-21:45 im lila Gym von sidekick im Westwerk Plagwitz. Nächsten Donnerstag ist wieder Probetraining. Interesse? Dann uns gern eine Mail an unsere Adresse [email protected]. Solltest du zufällig nur diesen Donnerstag nicht können schreib uns trotzdem, dann geben wir dir Bescheid wenn das nächste Probetraining is…
JoJo aka itsadisasta, Camilla & Fanny sprechen offen über Szene-Erfahrungen als FLINTA* unter vielen Männern, das Netzwerk, Konflikte und Veranstaltungstipps. Empowerment, Auskotzen und Szenemomente inklusive. Am Ende: Wie entwickelt sich die Szene, wie kann eine inklusive Szene aussehen – und welche Rolle spielt fem*vak dabei?
Content Note: Patriarchat, Sexismus, G*walt, Dr*gen, Grenzüberschreitungen, Diskriminieru…
🔥4❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @fem_vak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 207,342 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@fem_vak named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@sphere named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“fem*vak Leipzig” (@fem_vak), 113 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fem_vak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.