💖
- pb only30%
- pb + moodboard70%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@feltstudio
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
134subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003256394928 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @feltstudio |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 15 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/feltstudio |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 134 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 134 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 15 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
16 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 8 | 50.0% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 31.3% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 18.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2026 to 12 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💖
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ㅤ on the bus lanes, fare is IDR 5.000 delights, along the scenic path: 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘴 / @oddservicebot!
💘3
(+1/365) A GENTLE PROLOGUE on 27 January 2026 @meadcwbebalf, this little corner opens as a quiet note of thanks—no spectacle, no urgency, just appreciation placed with care. acknowledgements gather gently, thoughtful shares find their space, and every contribution rests where it’s meant to be. storyboards become records of helpful ideas, loveboards hold sincere intentions, iconsboards collect small yet meaningful g…
ㅤㅤㅤ the sweet headline about to find a commerce’s luck to be wrapped into one cart, offer a plated of price-badge at 10,000 IDR and allow the crumbs of fate repleted this format while @etsarosebot gently tends to seals your receipt with ease. ♥️ *:·. ㅤㅤㅤ
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ⁛ ˳ now revealed! a softly crafted pre-made piece, waiting to be claimed by those drawn to its quiet allure (...) IDR 6.000. if it calls to you, send a brief note to @rousyebot and let it find its way to you. 🗝 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ JAMES CORTIS ◉ 3.000 IDR n.) Muse replacement is available Click & Drop the format to @NingYudie Hi Ziyi, (paste;LINK) this moodboard is so my type and I’d love to purchase it, I can complete the payment via scan QRIS whenever you're set. Tysm! If you want to replace muse, add this: And I want to replace to: ...
💋1
ㅤ (pals fairy in progress..) 🎀📂 star-shaped waffles lose their understated charm without a kind soul across the table. so i abide here, inviting new amigos into my orbit. my space is reserved for kindred writers, profile needs creators, manipulation editors, and using primary account. the gate for new mutuals is always open, i serve you a berry parfait on the table with easy talks included. letting familiarity grow b…
ㅤ mail-@slips. called out over ouvrages: profile designatore, commerce of writings and frame manipulation wanderings in business section to bound around at sejours eves by formed central account as the entree card / 🎹💧໑* @titlecurbs. ㅤ
ㅤ liqueur / ♥. by costless-invitations @ringsbell @adormise @craftedyear @estchairee launch the notifications adorn rosebud salve marked 14th february in designed ateliers that will entwined thru your palate at 15.30 PM and don't miss the moment and take hold of your contingent dysfunction tapestries chevaliers. 🧸♥️ ㅤ
Sticker, posted without a caption
claimed!♥️
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @feltstudio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
💖
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2026 to 12 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@feltstudio named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“for felt. ♥︎” (@feltstudio), 134 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feltstudio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.