мой кумир покидает наши ряды. кто мне теперь будет порнушку писать то
👾6

Channel
@fel1iss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
124subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003101783088 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fel1iss |
| Description | ɜᴀᴨᴩᴇщᴇнᴋᴏй ᴛуᴛ нᴇ ᴛᴏᴩᴦую(и ʙᴀʍ нᴇ ᴄᴏʙᴇᴛую)🫡 ``нᴀʙиᴦᴀция → 1 ɜᴀᴋᴩᴇᴨ / #навигация !ᴛиᴋᴛᴏᴋ¡ >> 08.09.25 ¡ᴛgᴋ! >> 21.10.25 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fel1iss |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 124 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 124 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
411 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 94 | 22.9% | |
| 👾 | 87 | 21.2% | |
| custom 5395851457884866228 | 72 | 17.5% | |
| custom 5382259381041661671 | 68 | 16.5% | |
| custom 5283110327301461130 | 55 | 13.4% | |
| custom 5379753628401698268 | 18 | 4.38% | |
| 🤡 | 9 | 2.19% | |
| custom 5282953883117702048 | 8 | 1.95% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 411reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 January 2026 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fel1iss. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 January 2026 to 23 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
мой кумир покидает наши ряды. кто мне теперь будет порнушку писать то
👾6
Спустя долгое время молчания, отсутствия мотивации я решил уйти с фандома. Причиной не является ни учеба, ни моральное состояние. Сам фандом стал абсолютным дном, согласны вы с этим или нет. Все контент-мейкеры срут друг друга за спиной, но при этом спокойно любезничают между собой, словно вся ваша переписка уже не слетела в чат к кому-либо другому. Тут уже давно забыли и про минимальное уважение друг к другу, ребят,…
🕊3
автор хоть кто-то высказался
👾6🕊1
гедеон: где готье? скэриэл: я ебу гедеон: хорошо, не мешаю #мемы достаточно опозорилась, можно опять пропасть
🕊18👾8
ходят слухи, что я в фд пс но это слухи только
👾12
с моим днем, кстати
👾12🕊7🤡4
сразу скажу. про момент из сообщения, что это абсурдно говорить на фоне общей популярности. так и есть в целом, это странно как-то. персонаж популярен, его реально любят и ценят. откуда взялось мнение, что его недооценили так и не понятно
🕊10👾5
появляюсь редко, но метко. хочу вставить свои 5 небольших копеек на счет этого. так странно, что гедеона считают недооцененым, причём, что его любит большая часть фандома. обожает, любит и лелеет. насколько известно его всегда замечали, ему сочувствовали, даже взять в пример момент из книги, где описывалось как вела себя семья Хитклифов после смерти Грейс, и говорилось, что Гедеон поддерживал, оставался первый по усп…
🕊7👾3
гедеон: Адлер люмьер: Рязань. не так много городов есть на ь) гедеон: boston люмьер: вот сука #мемы всем привет, я слепашарое чмо. спасибо большое за подарок на 8 марта, я не видела, буду гореть в аду и схожу к окулисту, благодарю!🩷
👾19🕊6🤡1
скэриэл: а че ты делал? готье: в доту играл скэриэл: ты? и в доту? не верю скэриэл: всю прошел?) готье: мамку твою я всю прошел скэриэл: теперь верю #мемы переживайте, посты будут. админ, к сожалению, еще не включил газовую плиту
🕊21👾4🤡2
может мне кажется, но по-моему меня зовут во флуд или я ошибаюсь
👾12🕊8🤡2
с 8 марта дам😘
custom 538225938104166167110custom 52829538831177020486
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fel1iss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“фелисс вещает¿” (@fel1iss), 124 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fel1iss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.