躲床板底下还是被抓!警方在木牌抓获8名嫌犯并封禁场所! 昨天,柴桢警方在巴域市开展公开行政检查,对3处涉嫌非法滞留、非法务工及网络诈骗的场所进行突击排查。 行动共抓获8名涉案嫌疑人(含1名女性),并查获一批电子设备物证。其中,一伙人面对警方排查,躲在床板底下企图蒙混过关,结果依然被抓。 关注头条新闻频道➡️ ➡️ 西湖.@Xihu 金界.@naga ➡️ 铂莱.@bolai 迪威.@diwei ➡️ 段子.@nhdz 投稿.@sbsb ➡️ 缅北.@mian 资讯.@zixun ⬇️西湖集团5亿U备用金 🔥《凯发K8.vip 《天空娱乐 🔥《百乐门赌场 《铂莱Usdt 🔥《西湖A3.vip 《铂莱bolai 🔥《西湖T9.vip 《迪威diwei 🔥《斯里兰卡 《包网搭建 ➡️(海角) (亚太) (扫雷) ➡️(头条) …

Channel
东南亚头条-飞行员@toutiao
@feixingyuan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,980subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001413259220 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @duyue @feixingyuan @gangge |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/feixingyuan |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:29 | 1,980 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 1,980 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 1,978 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 1,978 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 1,979 | -13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:11 | 1,992 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 1,992 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 1,999 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 2,001 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.109%
- avg views ÷ 1,980 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2.2
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (7 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
#网友反馈:老挝金三角特外的平安村附近,今天早上8点就开始挨家挨户的敲门检查没有接到任何有检查的消息,目前只检查护照信息,有护照的暂时不用慌,没有护照的就要小心点了!!!关注头条新闻频道➡️ ➡️ 西湖.@Xihu 金界.@naga ➡️ 铂莱.@bolai 迪威.@diwei ➡️ 段子.@nhdz 投稿.@sbsb ➡️ 缅北.@mian 资讯.@zixun ⬇️西湖集团5亿U备用金 🔥《凯发K8.vip 《天空娱乐 🔥《百乐门赌场 《铂莱Usdt 🔥《西湖A3.vip 《铂莱bolai 🔥《西湖T9.vip 《迪威diwei 🔥《斯里兰卡 《包网搭建 ➡️(海角) (亚太) (扫雷) ➡️(头条) (爆料) (迪威) ➡️(小说) (快播) (电影) (天美app下载)
#网友投稿 现在老挝金三角特区1号关口进特区需要持有效证件才能进入,关卡要检查你的护照原件,P的护照不可以,如果没有原件,需要证明的你的护照有去签证.关注头条新闻频道➡️ ➡️ 西湖.@Xihu 金界.@naga ➡️ 铂莱.@bolai 迪威.@diwei ➡️ 段子.@nhdz 投稿.@sbsb ➡️ 缅北.@mian 资讯.@zixun ⬇️西湖集团5亿U备用金 🔥《凯发K8.vip 《天空娱乐 🔥《百乐门赌场 《铂莱Usdt 🔥《西湖A3.vip 《铂莱bolai 🔥《西湖T9.vip 《迪威diwei 🔥《斯里兰卡 《包网搭建 ➡️(海角) (亚太) (扫雷) ➡️(头条) (爆料) (迪威) ➡️(小说) (快播) (电影) (天美app下载)
#网友反馈:金三角特区 万国楼下,有治安局上去抓人了,现场的警车前门一辆,后门一辆! 目前还在查监控,不知道是查毒还是有人举报打野办公!! 关注头条新闻频道➡️ ➡️ 西湖.@Xihu 金界.@naga ➡️ 铂莱.@bolai 迪威.@diwei ➡️ 段子.@nhdz 投稿.@sbsb ➡️ 缅北.@mian 资讯.@zixun ⬇️西湖集团5亿U备用金 🔥《凯发K8.vip 《天空娱乐 🔥《百乐门赌场 《铂莱Usdt 🔥《西湖A3.vip 《铂莱bolai 🔥《西湖T9.vip 《迪威diwei 🔥《斯里兰卡 《包网搭建 ➡️(海角) (亚太) (扫雷) ➡️(头条) (爆料) (迪威) ➡️(小说) (快播) (电影) (天美app下载)
➡️西湖集团拥有4000个用户名 ➡️西湖即将投入2亿u资金 ➡️筹备西湖担保.王者风范。 旗下游戏放心娱乐.靠谱! 关注头条新闻频道➡️ ➡️ 西湖.@Xihu 金界.@naga ➡️ 铂莱.@bolai 迪威.@diwei ➡️ 段子.@nhdz 投稿.@sbsb ➡️ 缅北.@mian 资讯.@zixun ⬇️西湖集团5亿U备用金 🔥《凯发K8.vip 《天空娱乐 🔥《百乐门赌场 《铂莱Usdt 🔥《西湖A3.vip 《铂莱bolai 🔥《西湖T9.vip 《迪威diwei 🔥《斯里兰卡 《包网搭建 ➡️(海角) (亚太) (扫雷) ➡️(头条) (爆料) (迪威) ➡️(小说) (快播) (电影) (天美app下载)
芒果园区或被改造为全柬诈骗物证库 今天,实居省警方配合柬埔寨国家打击网络诈骗委员会工作组,前往位于基里隆县3号国道沿线的“金鸿园区”(原为芒果园区)进行实地检查。 该园区此前因涉嫌网络诈骗犯罪已被依法实施临时封禁。此次检查旨在筹备并修复该场所,将其改建为专门存放全国各地查获的网诈案涉案物证的标准技术保管库。继续加工芒果不好吗?关注头条新闻频道➡️ ➡️ 西湖.@Xihu 金界.@naga ➡️ 铂莱.@bolai 迪威.@diwei ➡️ 段子.@nhdz 投稿.@sbsb ➡️ 缅北.@mian 资讯.@zixun ⬇️西湖集团5亿U备用金 🔥《凯发K8.vip 《天空娱乐 🔥《百乐门赌场 《铂莱Usdt 🔥《西湖A3.vip 《铂莱bolai 🔥《西湖T9.vip 《迪威diwei 🔥《斯里兰卡 《包网搭建 ➡️(海角) (亚太) (扫雷)…
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @feixingyuan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,454,776 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚头条-飞行员@toutiao” (@feixingyuan), 1,980 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feixingyuan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.