Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FeileR🥶

Channel

FeileR🥶

@feiler404

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

877subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001965369475
TypeChannel
Username@feiler404
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/feiler404

Growth

8778898837 August 2026 — 889 subscribers8 August 2026 — 889 subscribers14 August 2026 — 883 subscribers22 August 2026 — 877 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 875–891 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 20:13877-6
14 Aug 2026, 14:34883-6
8 Aug 2026, 01:05889no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:40889first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 877 subscribers
Avg views / post
136
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (31 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,766
Reactions total76
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

108 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53727987706793918614339.8%
custom 54159826954506819483229.6%
custom 54069131848104098291413.0%
🐳109.26%
custom 531877310720744740365.56%
custom 525820379477208585421.85%
custom 538899819761396575510.926%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @feiler404. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC80 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

После Эда глянул сезон про историю братьев Менендес ✅ Да, опять был отложен монтаж новых роликов :( Что могу сказать по самому сериалу? Я просмотр этого сезона откладывал до последнего. Не знаю, мне казалось это не интересным. Ну какие то богатые шизики захерачили своих родителей. Хз, мне это не показалось интересным, по этому я после Дамера глянул 3 сезон про Эда Но история братьев и вправду оказалась заниматель

custom 53727987706793918612

6 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC101 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ахереть написал... Надо было голосовое записывать🤣

custom 54069131848104098295custom 54159826954506819482

6 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC100 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Только что посмотрел третий сезон "Монстры", история Эда Гейна✅ Поставил разработку двух роликов на паузу и за сутки посмотрел сериал⏸ Опять же, много художественных сцен которых не было (или известно не точно) в реальности.🪶 Если смотреть просто в отрыве от реальности, то это замечательный сезон. Может даже сильнее чем про Дамера (может это просто первое впечатление, хз) Здесь присутствует какой то смысл. Эд был

custom 53727987706793918615

5 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC117 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я дожил, блять, наконец-то Парамаунт договорились на счёт прав с наследниками Уэса Крэйвена и собираются делать перезапуск франшизы "Кошмар на улице Вязов"💀 Проект уже запущен в производство, но детали не разглашаются Известно что события будут происходить во вселенной первой части. Это будет фильм, опирающийся на атмосферу и мифологию оригинала 1984 года😵 Фредди Крюгер снова появится на больших экранах👉 Ждем э

custom 54159826954506819489custom 52582037947720858541custom 53727987706793918611

4 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC123 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Послушал тут новый альбом Салуки✅ (да, про музыку я тоже иногда пишу) Это вообще мясистое мясо🥩 Почти все треки улетели в плейлист🔥 В очередной раз доказал что он талантливый мужик🎧

custom 54159826954506819486

4 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC137 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кстатииии "Зловещие мертвецы: Пекло" мне напоминает Резидент Эвил 7☔️ И там и там сумасшедшая семья. И там и там высокий градус безумия. И там и там есть смешная бабушка на коляске😂 Да и в игре была пасхалка на Зловещих мертаецов (или Техасскую резню бензопилой) там просто в одном из сараев силует пилы нарисован🪓 Я сейчас перепрохожу семёрку, подсниму футажи и подведу полную мысль в ролике🌹

custom 54159826954506819489🐳1custom 52582037947720858541

3 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC150 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кто шарит за этого челика?😎 В детстве нравился этот ужастик) Жаль что франшиза умерла, не успев начаться🥲 Кстати, ходят слухи что Парамаунт собирается делать "мягкий" перезапуск, и снять сиквел второй части монстра в шляпе. В главной роли должна быть Дженна Ортега😈 Согласен, звучит ооочень круто чтобы быть правдой) Все мы помним ВЕЛИКУЮ 4 часть Криперса. Так что я бы на вашем месте не питал надежд😭 Будет ли новый

custom 53727987706793918615

3 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC136 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сажусь за монтаж видео🥲

custom 54069131848104098299custom 53187731072074474031custom 53889981976139657551

2 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC163 views8 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Озвучка готова✅

custom 53727987706793918618

2 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC167 viewsread 8 August 2026

Надо было желание загадать чтоб не отписывались от канала... ☠️

2 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC184 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кто там бл не верил в меня? Теперь власть в моих руках 👿

1 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTC160 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Скачал себе ещё Сайлент Хилл 2 ремейк😶‍🌫️ Тоже хочу перепройти. Давно в него не играл, аж руки чешутся) Нужно начать на хардкоре〰️ Какие то моменты уже позабыл, надеюсь весело будет😎

custom 54159826954506819486

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @feiler404. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FeileR🥶” (@feiler404), 877 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feiler404.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.