Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 飞机哥

Channel

飞机哥

@feijige123jj

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

408subscribers

+18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003283525166
TypeChannel
Username@feijige123jj
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/feijige123jj

Growth

3904083997 August 2026 — 390 subscribers8 August 2026 — 391 subscribers8 August 2026 — 391 subscribers15 August 2026 — 396 subscribers22 August 2026 — 399 subscribers29 August 2026 — 408 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 22 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 387–411 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 21:46408+9
22 Aug 2026, 07:37399+3
15 Aug 2026, 16:18396+5
8 Aug 2026, 06:01391no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:01391+1
7 Aug 2026, 19:41390first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.245%
avg views ÷ 408 subscribers
Avg views / post
1.0
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held6 (8 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total6
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
31s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC1 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

昵称:飞机哥333 昵称:菜菜 省份:安徽 城市:合肥 年龄:23 身高:160 体重:100 罩呗:c 职业:学生 是否是chu女:否 可不可以口:可 能不能无套/体检后:能 Sm能不能:能 有没有纹身:无 可否去外省:不可以 是否可过夜:可 可不可以同居:可 月可陪伴天数: 3-7 能否去港澳台(或者安全国家):能 大概姨妈日期: 月生活费多少: 6k-1.2w 分几次给生活费:3 自我介绍加分项:够骚 对金🐷雷点(不接受):没有 最快什么时间可以见面陪伴:都行 介绍费:7888

8 Aug 2026, 05:53 UTC1 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

昵称:飞机哥380 昵称: 省份:湖南 城市:长沙 年龄:05 身高:162 体重:42kg 罩呗:B 职业:雪生 是否是chu女:不是 可不可以口:可 能不能无套/体检后:不可 Sm能不能:轻微 有没有纹身:无 可否去外省:可 是否可过夜:可 可不可以同居: 可 月可陪伴天数: 3 能否去港澳台(或者安全国家):可 大概姨妈日期: 月中 月生活费多少: 1.4 分几次给生活费:2-3 自我介绍加分项:在线女大 对金🐷雷点(不接受):无 最快什么时间可以见面陪伴:随时 介绍费:7888 飞机哥

8 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC1 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

昵称:飞机哥201 昵称: 省份:浙江 城市:杭州 年龄:05 身高:170 体重:95 罩呗:D 职业:雪生 是否是chu女:不是 可不可以口:可 能不能无套/体检后:不可 Sm能不能:轻微 有没有纹身:无 可否去外省:可 是否可过夜:可 可不可以同居: 可 月可陪伴天数: 3 能否去港澳台(或者安全国家):可 大概姨妈日期: 月中 月生活费多少: 2.5 分几次给生活费:2-3 自我介绍加分项: 清纯气质型 漫画身材 性格乖巧不粘人 有分寸感 对金🐷雷点(不接受):无 最快什么时间可以见面陪伴:随时 介绍费:7888 飞机哥

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @feijige123jj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“飞机哥” (@feijige123jj), 408 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feijige123jj.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.