По всем вопросам в лс - @na_steesss
t.me/anonaskbot?start=ckCaePEHliriY9q
анонимные сообщения
Инстаграм:https://instagram.com/na.steessss?igshid=YTQwZjQ
Created
Between 1 October 2025 and 28 February 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Previous handles
@feekuss was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
@nasteessss88_fikysss held 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Growth
8 measurements spanning 99 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 144–180 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Nov 2026, 08:22
176
no change
14 Nov 2026, 07:47
176
+18
6 Sept 2026, 22:36
158
+1
23 Aug 2026, 09:43
157
+2
15 Aug 2026, 15:37
155
+6
8 Aug 2026, 20:15
149
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:24
149
+1
7 Aug 2026, 06:03
148
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
44.4%
avg views ÷ 176 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.2
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
30 (5 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
860
Reactions total
107
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 08:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
978
Videos
33
Links
42
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
33s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
243 reactions across 29 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💘
68
28.0%
❤
52
21.4%
custom 5190708856161853757
24
9.88%
custom 5337024764005359239
24
9.88%
💋
17
7.00%
custom 5336825507587585914
11
4.53%
🍓
9
3.70%
custom 5336818609870115546
8
3.29%
custom 5402169994727412026
8
3.29%
❤🔥
6
2.47%
🕊
4
1.65%
custom 5337305431528214414
2
0.823%
custom 5400196130837386303
2
0.823%
custom 5458790157748550600
2
0.823%
custom 5809644086243627995
2
0.823%
custom 5400303642458740350
1
0.412%
custom 5471907739489826360
1
0.412%
🎉
1
0.412%
🥰
1
0.412%
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩
@p1llowhugg3r
DRAW THIS IN YOUR STYLE — ПЕРЕРИСУЙТЕ МОЙ АРТ В СВОЁМ СТИЛЕ.
Ваша задача — перерисовать мою работу, сохранив узнаваемость оригинала, но привнеся в неё собственный художественный стиль.
Дедлайн: 15 декабря включительно.
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩место
• Фигурка Изуку Мидории (если вы не из России — договоримся об альтернативном призе).
• Закреп вашей работы и вашего ТГК в моём канале на 2 недели.
• 250 Tel…
Кто знает этот тренд в тви тот молодец <3
Решила тоже чета накалякать с Кацуки, ПОТОМУ ЧТО Я В ТАМБЛЕРЕ ТЕПЕРЬ ПОПУЛЯРИТИ, прикиньте да. Скетчики с дкбк, что выше, там залетели аж на 2,6к+ ЛАЙКОВ и у меня там теперь 200 ЧИТАТЕЛЕЙ! Нужно и их теперь кормить. Знали бы вы, как я устала его рендерить.. есть куда расти конечно.
В комментариях так же будет полная версия с покусанным Кацуки. Возможно в скором времени похо…
1⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣6️⃣7️⃣8️⃣
9️⃣🔟1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣
Я вспомнила что у меня есть такое приложение как прокрейт,вот короче да,на ночь мини дроп в виде скетча.
К слову все же карта градиента вещь нихуевая 👍
#ночной_дроп #скетч
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩Участники:
https://t.me/feekusss88kyskys
https://t.me/podvalkikixD
@Daamor_art
https://t.me/SuPesok
@rishadraws
@Lunanowa
@AikaSsBro
Всем спасибо за участие, надо будет еще раз такое повторить ☺️
#коллаб #палитра
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
от Союза Художников
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
условия:
🌟подписка на спонсора @popeechunya
🌟репост этого поста в чат/канал
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
в комментариях пришлите свои работы и ссылку на канал!
будем многих выкладывать 🔗
❤3💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @feekuss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Скетчи по другим фандомам (бс/геншин например) 👯♀️17%
Предложу в комментариях ⬇️0%
The shares total 189%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фикуs” (@feekuss), 176 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feekuss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
