Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

feedjee

@feedjee_production

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

211subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003692952207
TypeChannel
Username@feedjee_production
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 10 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/feedjee_production

Growth

211212211.58 Aug 2026, 05:32 — 212 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:00 — 212 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 17:35 — 211 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:328 Aug 2026, 17:35
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 211–212 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 17:35211-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:00212no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:32212first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 10 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
28s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

119 reactions across 13 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4840.3%
2016.8%
👍1310.9%
💯75.88%
💔65.04%
🤣65.04%
👌32.52%
😭32.52%
21.68%
👏21.68%
🤔21.68%
🎉10.84%
🏆10.84%
👎10.84%
💩10.84%
🙉10.84%
🤩10.84%
🤮10.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 13 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jun 2026, 08:43 UTC227 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9f_lxrt464&list=PLsDvLHbj1FHlXgSDyntDi810KinrsZE3h

🔥11👍3

24 May 2026, 21:49 UTC329 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ну что, наконец я нашёл те самые наушники которые оставлю себе! Hifiman Arya organics - китайцы и тут победили и германию(beyerdynamic) и сша(den clark). При наличии правильно настроенного риалфонса звук имеет невероятную транслируемость. Во всех моих 5 парах наушников и 2х парах мониторов, всё прозвучало одинаково хорошо, со мной такое впервые если честно. Возможно, такая песня попалась безпроблемная, но то что я с

🔥91👎1💩1🤮1

1 May 2026, 16:39 UTC343 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥МИР ТРУД МАЙ🔥

🔥12🎉1🏆1

26 Apr 2026, 09:23 UTC369 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В качестве дополнительной пары для мониторинга данные наушники можно было бы оставить, однако я продолжу поиск идеальной модели для студийного использования. Оценка по пятибалльной шкале: комфорт — 2 балла, звук — 3 балла.

💔2🙉1

26 Apr 2026, 09:23 UTC283 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Да, вы молодцы, правильно ответили. К сожалению они для меня оказались не носибельный. У меня есть beyerdynamic custom studio и те сидят как влитые, а эти казалось бы с таким же внешним видом, просто не держаться на моих ушах, всё время приходиться поправлять и не дай Бог лишнее движения и сразу меняется ачх. Из-за недостаточно прижимной силы теряется бас и плотность и остаются зудящие высокие частоты. Наушники сами

2👌21

20 Apr 2026, 17:11 UTC296 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

кто-то готовится к штурму топ-чартов

👍6🤣6🔥1🤩1

15 Apr 2026, 07:12 UTC327 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В дополнение к предыдущему посту, добавлю, что когда я заказывал эти хай энд наушники за 90к, я очень надеялся услышать того чего ранее мне не было доступно, но я был поражен насколько звук приближен к моим sennheiser hd180. Я не знаю ачх этих ушей, но видимо, что то около хармона, и даже более прямые чем у дэна, тут нет такого провала в середине и более ровный верх. Конечно там не было того саба и всё более округло

🔥2

14 Apr 2026, 12:48 UTC251 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Прощайте Ден Кларки Noire X, это было приятное знакомство, но надеюсь следующего хозяина вы порадуете больше. Очень благодарен Dr. Head, что они всё таки одобрили мне возврат средств. Эти уши брал в слепую, изучая форумы, но к сожалению анатомически совершенно мне не подошли. Очень тугие, настолько, что после работы у меня красные полосы оставались на щеках. Так же уши просто не помещались в амбушюры и с прикосновени

💔4😭3👍1🤔1

14 Apr 2026, 12:38 UTC269 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Делюсь своим алгоритмом предварительной обработки вокала, который использую перед тем как приступать к сведению. https://youtu.be/Ds-rx9EFDw0?is=8EG5IEmtScyZX35G

5🔥3

26 Mar 2026, 07:46 UTC362 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Привет, друзья! На моём канале feedjee sound production новое видео, и сегодня мы погрузимся в мир по-настоящему профессионального звука с новыми студийными мониторами Adam Audio A8H. Это не просто колонки – это трехполосные монстры, призванные перевернуть ваше представление о чистоте и глубине звука в студии любого размера. https://youtu.be/-rdd0C3HrUA?is=XZ_V1nGIaNtlcxF-

🔥53

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @feedjee_production. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Feb 2026, 16:56 UTCAnonymous Poll53 voters

Какой тип мониторинга вы используете при сведении и мастеринге?

  1. Мониторы15%
  2. Наушники40%
  3. Мониторы+Наушники25%
  4. Мониторы+наушники+щит-контроль21%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 13 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 246,747 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“feedjee” (@feedjee_production), 211 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feedjee_production.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.