!!!!! Message to @polyginbot if you want to buy a profitable bot for Polymarket. !!!!!

Channel
Fed. Russian Insiders®
@federal_russian_insiders
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
864subscribers
-36 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002193817016 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @federal_russian_insiders |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/federal_russian_insiders |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 864 | -9 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 873 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 880 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 884 | -9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 893 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 899 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:40 | 899 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 900 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
And we continue to grow! Start today t.me/cxcontact
❗❗❗❗❗ Not Traditional Trading – This is Polymarket 15-Minute Trading This is not normal trading. We are trading on Polymarket’s 15-minute markets, and the opportunity right now is extremely interesting. Please take a moment to read this carefully, because this could be a very good chance for you. In the last 3 days, we turned $40 into $400 profit using a simple strategy that anyone can execute. No trading experi…
👆
🆓
Get FREE VIP Crypto Trading Signals 100% FREE! - Lifetime Access! 🕯 Here’s how to get your lifetime access: Use the trading signals with one of these exchanges: STEP 1: Sign up with one of our partner exchanges using our link: ✖️ BingX (recommended) 📈 MEXC 💱 Bitget ✖️ OKX 📈 KuCoin 💰 Bybit STEP 2: Deposit a minimum of $50 (access to 1 VIP channel). STEP 3: Send a screenshot of your registration to @cxcont…
🔥🔥🔥 VIP CryptoX 📈 Access to the 25 Best Channels for Crypto Trading Signals: ▫️ Binance Killers ▫️ Federal Russian Insiders ▫️ Bitcoin Bullets ▫️ Wallstreet Queen ▫️ Crypto Inner Circle ▫️ +20 more VIP Channels 🤫 Exclusive Crypto Signals 🔝 High Profits with 25 Channels 🆒 Lifetime Membership 🛍 Limited Time Offer LIFETIME access now for only... 🔥 1 Channel = $100 🔥 25 Channels = $350 Payment: 📱 TRC-20 (USD…
$AAVE ANALYSIS ------------------ $AAVE is compressing into a wedge, trading around 112–113 after repeated rejections under the descending cap near 120–121. Momentum is muted, and the next clean break should decide direction. As long as 112 holds, a push back toward 117–121 remains in play. A 4H close above 121 opens 125–130, while a break and hold below 110–112 exposes 106 first, then 100 as the next downside pock…
$ATOM ANALYSIS ------------------ $ATOM is trading around 1.88 after a sharp rejection from the 2.03–2.12 supply zone. The bounce is corrective for now, structure stays heavy while price sits below that upper band. As long as 1.82–1.90 holds, a squeeze back into 1.95–2.03 remains possible. A clean reclaim of 2.03–2.12 is the trigger for continuation, otherwise a break below 1.82 opens the door to 1.75 and potential…
$ETH ANALYSIS ------------------ $ETH just ran hard into the descending supply line and rejected back to ~2,027, which keeps this move in “relief rally” territory until it can reclaim the top side. The structure is still a broad range, with the market reacting between the ~2,050–2,090 ceiling and the mid-range support below. As long as ETH holds 2,000, upside attempts remain live toward 2,050–2,090, and a clean hol…
$ADA ANALYSIS ------------------ $ADA reacted hard off the 0.25–0.26 demand zone and ripped into the 0.30–0.305 area, then cooled back to ~0.29. That’s strength, but this leg is now in digestion mode after a fast impulse. As long as 0.285–0.29 holds, the structure stays constructive and 0.30–0.305 remains the next level to reclaim. If 0.285 fails, a deeper reset back into 0.26–0.255 becomes the cleaner support test…
$DOGE ANALYSIS ------------------ $DOGE defended the rising support line around 0.092 and snapped back into the 0.10 handle, with price now hovering near 0.101. That is a clean reaction, but we are still inside a choppy range. The next move depends on whether this bounce can hold above the pivot. Hold 0.098–0.095. Upside targets 0.103–0.107, then 0.110–0.115 if momentum expands. Lose 0.095. Downside reopens 0.092, …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @federal_russian_insiders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@wallstreetqueenofficialTG · 212,845
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 August 2026
@cryptobulletofficialTG · 39,890
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 5 September 2026
@degenpump_crypto_pump_signals · 27,354
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 8 September 2026
@KucoinPumpChannel · 43,031
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
@fatpigsignals · 42,306
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fed. Russian Insiders®” (@federal_russian_insiders), 864 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/federal_russian_insiders.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.