Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝙁𝘾 𝙆𝙍𝘼𝙎𝙉𝙊𝘿𝘼𝙍

Channel

𝙁𝘾 𝙆𝙍𝘼𝙎𝙉𝙊𝘿𝘼𝙍

@fckrasnodarbyki

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

18subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003625058701
TypeChannel
Username@fckrasnodarbyki
Created15 December 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fckrasnodarbyki

Growth

181918.513 August 2026 — 19 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19 subscribers5 September 2026 — 18 subscribers13 August 20265 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 24 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18–19 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 20:5618-1
14 Aug 2026, 10:1619no change
13 Aug 2026, 07:3119first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 15 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
53s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

65 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2436.9%
🔥1320.0%
custom 52269859323553060241015.4%
custom 5389103596111409794913.8%
👍69.23%
🤯34.62%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2025 to 5 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jan 2026, 16:50 UTC25 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎉Поздравляем с днём рождения старшего тренера быков Артура Оленина! 🥳 🐃 ФК Краснодар | Подписаться🍿

🔥2

1 Jan 2026, 16:28 UTC30 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🥳Поздравляем с днём рождения экс-наставника «быков» Сергея Ташуева! 🕯 🐃ФК Краснодар | Подписаться🍿

2🔥2custom 52269859323553060241

1 Jan 2026, 10:02 UTC26 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

С Новым годом 🚗 🐃ФК Краснодар | Подписаться🍿

2custom 52269859323553060242custom 53891035961114097942

1 Jan 2026, 10:01 UTC20 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🏆💚 «Краснодар» — команда года FONBET Кубка России Быки провели исторический год, завершением которого стал выход в полуфинал Пути РПЛ. «Краснодар» набрал 52% голосов, опередив ЦСКА и «Спартак». 🐃ФК Краснодар | Подписаться🍿

2🔥1custom 52269859323553060241

31 Dec 2025, 12:24 UTC20 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

💪Эдуарда Сперцяна в 2025-м в гонке ассистентов догнать было просто невозможно 🔝 🐃ФК Краснодар | Подписаться🍿

2🔥1custom 53891035961114097941

30 Dec 2025, 16:07 UTC22 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Кто круче⁉️ ❤️-Агкацев и Хасбулла 🇷🇺 👍-Сперцян и Ибрагимович🇸🇪 🐃ФК Краснодар | Подписаться🍿

👍31custom 52269859323553060241custom 53891035961114097941

30 Dec 2025, 14:51 UTC24 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🇦🇲Эдит со Сперцяном🍿 🐃ФК Краснодар | Подписаться🍿

2👍1🔥1

30 Dec 2025, 13:43 UTC28 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

☃️Новогодние праздники — не повод пропускать тренировки 🏋️‍♀️ 🚘Виталий Стежко вместе с супругой и сыном заглянули в манеж «Юбилейный» 🙂 🐃ФК Краснодар | Подписаться🍿

3🔥1🤯1

30 Dec 2025, 13:15 UTC26 viewsread 13 August 2026

Решено, теперь мы оставляем только Краснодар 🐂

30 Dec 2025, 10:30 UTC67 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

Как вам идея совместить этот канал с Краснодаром и ЦСКА⁉️

  1. Да, было бы круто🐃🐴42%
  2. Нет, лучше оставить только про Краснодар🐃58%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2🔥1custom 52269859323553060241

30 Dec 2025, 10:30 UTC74 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🍿Джон Кордоба — автор лучшего гола в первой части сезона 2025/26 🇨🇴 🥇Его великолепный сольный проход и дальний удар под перекладину принесли нам победу в матче с московским «Динамо» 🍿 🥈На втором месте ещё один гол Джона — в ворота ЦСКА, на третьем — мяч Дугласа Аугусто в ворота «Крыльев» 🥉 Заслуженно❓ ❤️-да 🙂-нет 🐃ФК Краснодар | Подписаться🍿

3🔥1🤯1custom 52269859323553060241custom 53891035961114097941

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @fckrasnodarbyki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Dec 2025, 10:30 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

Как вам идея совместить этот канал с Краснодаром и ЦСКА⁉️

  1. Да, было бы круто🐃🐴42%
  2. Нет, лучше оставить только про Краснодар🐃58%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Dec 2025, 18:24 UTCAnonymous Poll11 voters

Краснодар лучший клуб РПЛ ⁉️

  1. Да😍45%
  2. Нет🤡55%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2025 to 5 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙁𝘾 𝙆𝙍𝘼𝙎𝙉𝙊𝘿𝘼𝙍” (@fckrasnodarbyki), 18 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fckrasnodarbyki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.