2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,065–1,067 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 02:12
1,066
no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:46
1,066
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 27 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.82%
avg views ÷ 1,066 subscribers
Avg views / post
94.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026
Posts held
8 (27 March 2026 – 17 July 2026)
Views total
94
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
16 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
9
56.3%
🔥
3
18.8%
❤🔥
2
12.5%
👍
2
12.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«Коммерческий креатив в моде»: или как превращать творчество в деньги
✔️ PROfashion запускает офлайн-интенсив «Коммерческий креатив в моде». Программа разработана Центром креативных индустрий Философского факультета МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова.
📍Где: Москва, Ломоносовский пр., 27, Шуваловский корпус МГУ;
📆Когда: 26 августа 2026;
‼️Формат: очно, 4 дня по 3 занятия в день.
Знакомая боль фешен-брендов: коллекция сильн…
16 июля в Москве состоится традиционная летняя конференция Fashion Dive – для специалистов индустрии моды и красоты. Конференция о том, как брендам не потеряться в информационном шуме, как адаптироваться к постоянным изменениям правил и условий, как найти коммерческий баланс между своими магазинами и маркетплейсами.
Генеральный ди…
Бренд одежды и аксессуаров Radical Chic выпустил два новых шелковых платка – «Бобки» и «17 Небес», созданных по итогам художественной экспедиции в Кенозерье и Каргополь Архангельской области.
В основу дизайнов легли образы человека-коня Полкана из каргопольской игрушки и расписные «небеса» северных часовен – культурного ландшафта Кенозерья – объекта Всемирного наследия ЮНЕСКО.
Проект, реализованный совместно с Наци…
Офлайн-тренинги Fashion Consulting Group. Июль 2026
Не заметить изменения в рознице сейчас невозможно, всё меняется быстрее, чем успеваешь привыкнуть. Скидки уже не работают как раньше, управлять коллекцией и остатками стало сложнее, а покупатели ждут совсем другого отношения. В таких условиях особенно ценно не просто послушать теорию, а сесть за один стол, разобрать ваши реальные ситуации и сразу увезти с собой раб…
Где будет весь fashion-бизнес со 2 по 4 июня?
⚫️2–4 июня | BEE-TOGETHER.ru
Масштаб: Более 300 фабрик из 10+ стран на одной дистанции вытянутой руки.
Результат: Прямые контракты без посредников и переплат.
Ресурс: Проверенные поставщики тканей, фурнитуры и готовые мощности для масштабирования вашего бренда.
⚫️3–4 июня | BEE-FASHION FORUM
Экспертиза: 50+ практикующих спикеров: от владельцев производств до топ-менедже…
Fashion Consulting Group представляет полный отраслевой отчет по российскому рынку одежды и обуви 2014–2025F
Fashion Consulting Group анонсирует выпуск полной версии ежегодного отраслевого отчета «Российский рынок одежды и обуви 2014–2025F» — комплексное исследование, которое объединяет макроэкономику, потребительский спрос, ценовую динамику, каналы продаж, легкую промышленность, финансовые показатели ведущих игроко…
Российский рынок одежды и обуви — 2026. Что происходит на перегретом рынке
Год назад Fashion Consulting Group спрогнозировала перегрев рынка после ускоренного роста 2022–2023 гг. И на текущий момент этот сценарий стал реальностью.
Предложение расширилось быстрее, чем спрос смог его «переварить». В 2022–2023 гг. на рынок вышло 73 новых бренда, но уже к 2026 году треть проектов закрыта.
При этом поведение покупателей…
Бренд женской одежды 1811 Eighteen One One выпустил новую весеннюю коллекцию «Лизетт».
Ее посвятили Елизавете Петровне — российской императрице, которая умело совмещала свою любовь к светским раутам со стремлением ко всеобщему просвещению.
❤🔥2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @fcgchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 811,880 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FCGMEDIA” (@fcgchannel), 1,066 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fcgchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
