Channel
@fc_talant
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
73subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001308589727 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fc_talant |
| Created | 25 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fc_talant |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 73 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 74 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:50 | 74 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 30 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
30 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 26.7% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 10.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2023 to 13 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А теперь моменты с лайнсменами (боковыми арбитрами) : На первом видео, в 1ом туре лайнсмен Сергей Грищенко увидел офсайд. На втором видео - офсайды в матче 2го тура, лайнсмен - Канат Мырсабеков На третьем видео -боковой судья Эльдияр Салыбаев не успев занять позицию, не добежав до лицевой линии назначает угловой. Сегодня же этот судья доказывает что мяч пересек линию в воздухе. Мы же остаемся в недоумении, как с та…
👍3❤1
В матче 7го тура, главный арбитр матча Нурзатбек Абдыкадыров принимает решение не смотреть ВАР в ситуации с нарушением на Азимбеке Алымбекове в штрафной площади Алги. Позднее Абдыкадыров объясняет своё решение "недостаточным касанием" для назначения пенальти. В матче 5го тура судья Бекболот Амиров не назначает пенальти в ворота Нефтчи за игру рукой. В матче 3го тура, Санжар Жакыпбеков после просмотра ВАР, не наказыва…
👍1
На первом видео - момент с удалением нашего защитника Валерия Мурзакова главным судьёй матча Санжаром Жакыпбековым. На втором видео - нападающий соперника умышленно бьёт Антона Полева, не владеющего мячом. Жакыпбеков после консультации с судьёй ВАР Нурзатом Абдыкадыровым даёт игроку Алая за это нарушение жёлтую карточку. На третьем видео Санжар Жакыпбеков удаляет нашего нападающего Алымбекова Азимбека в матче 3го тур…
Мы проанализировали эпизод из матча Талант против Алай и начертили линию - офсайд очевиден. Лайнсмен Нураалы Абдунабиев не успел занять нужную позицию и не был на одной линии с эпизодом, из-за чего не увидел офсайд. VAR не стал проверять положение вне игры. Однако в эпизоде с красной карточкой Мурзакову главный судья Санжар Жакыпбеков сам чётко просил показать офсайдную камеру. Возникает вопрос — почему судья Санжар…
Video, posted without a caption
👍4
Момент первого гола Алги в сегодняшней игре, офсайд зафиксирован не был. Что думаете вы?
👍2
⚽️ Сегодня в селе Беш-Кюнгей на матче Талант - Дордой Вот тут ахуенно: светит солнце, вид на горы, деревенские лавочки, велики, бегают дети и очень бодрый футбол. Колоритно. @vyshelizkomnaty
❤7👏3🔥2
В Лиге появился свой Тед Лассо. «Талант» повторит путь «Лестера»? https://prosports.kg/news/598018-v-lige-poyavilsya-svoi-ted-lasso-talant-povtorit-put-lestera
👍4😁2
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @fc_talant. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FC Talant” (@fc_talant), 73 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fc_talant.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.