Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ФК Лида News 📰

@fc_lida_official

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

495subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002342383328
TypeChannel
Username@fc_lida_official
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fc_lida_official

Growth

4854954906 August 2026 — 485 subscribers6 August 2026 — 485 subscribers13 August 2026 — 495 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 484–497 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:18495+10
6 Aug 2026, 18:48485no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:45485first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
160.3%
avg views ÷ 495 subscribers
Avg views / post
793
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (13 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total10,314
Reactions total130
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

166 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6941.6%
👍2515.1%
❤‍🔥2213.3%
😢1710.2%
😁63.61%
🥰63.61%
🏆42.41%
👏42.41%
😱42.41%
👌31.81%
😭21.20%
🎃10.602%
💯10.602%
🔥10.602%
😐10.602%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 166reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC245 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Победа на выезде в столице 🔥 🇧🇾 Первая лига, 18-й тур. «Динамо-Минск-2» 1:2 «Лида» ⚽️ Голы: 0:1 - Дятлов (19’), 0:2 - Вашкевич (38’), 1:2 - Леонтюк (66’)

❤‍🔥6

5 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC333 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📍ФК"Лида" изменения в составе команды. Клуб покинул Черняк Кирилл (нападающий), прибыл Зайцев Никита (2008г.р.)

❤‍🔥7👍3

4 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC≈1,330 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📍ФК"Лида" покинул защитник Позняк Александр. Также в команде теперь новый вратарь - Василючек Владислав (1994г.р.)

7

1 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC588 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

«Лида» забирает 3 очка на выезде 🏆 Первая лига, 17-й тур. «Островец» 1:3 «Лида» ⚽️ Голы: 0:1 - Полуянов (44’), 0:2 - Чернодаров (54’), 1:2 - Федосенко (61’), 1:3 - Вашкевич (86’)

👍10🥰61👏1😐1

28 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC864 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📍Команду ФК"Лида" покинул вратарь Васильев Алексей. Спасибо,что был с нами.

😢9❤‍🔥5🎃1🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC735 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📆Ближайшие игры состоятся: 17 тур/ 1 августа/ 18:00 ФК"Островец" - ФК"Лида" 18 тур/ 5 августа/ 19:00 ФК"Динамо-Минск-2" -ФК"Лида" 19 тур/ 9 августа/ 15:00 ФК"Лида" - ФК"Слуцк-2024" 20 тур/ 15 августа/ 18:00 ФК"СКА-1938" - ФК"Лида"

👍1

27 Jul 2026, 08:16 UTC693 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🏆 Первая лига, 16-й тур. ФК«Лида» 1:3 ФК«Слоним-2017» ⚽️ Голы: 0:1 - Ткацевич (29’), 0:2 - Калинченко (49’), 1:2 - Дятлов (73’), 1:3 - А. Чуйко (84’) Незабитый пенальти — Вашкевич (45+2’, «Лида», вратарь парировал) ❌ Удаления: Ивановский («Лида», 85’) По итогам 16 тура в турнирной таблице ФК"Лида" на пятой позиции.

😢8👏3😭2

24 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC≈1,010 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📍В ФК"Лида" новый нападающий - Вашкевич Дмитрий (2000г.р.) Добро пожаловать в команду!

9😁6

23 Jul 2026, 05:57 UTC845 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📍В команде ФК"Лида" новый полузащитник - Жестарев Макс (2002г.р.)

10👍6❤‍🔥2

20 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC858 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Артём Полуянов теперь игрок ФК"Лиды" на правах аренды.

6😱4❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @fc_lida_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Jul 2026, 20:54 UTCAnonymous Poll732 voters

Лучший гол 15-ого тура?

  1. 1-ый гол7%
  2. 2-ой гол5%
  3. 3-ий гол28%
  4. 4-ый гол1%
  5. 5-ый гол8%
  6. 6-ой гол5%
  7. 7-ой гол39%
  8. 8-ой гол5%
  9. 9-ый гол3%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 773,060 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q2134369 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelFC Lida
DescriptionBelarus football club
X / Twitter@fc_lida
YouTubeUCj_2UnhoPA3091vcR8L8VUQ
Official sitehttp://fclida.by/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ФК Лида News 📰” (@fc_lida_official), 495 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fc_lida_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.