Channel
@fazaih_osmani
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
57subscribers
+21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004419183594 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fazaih_osmani |
| Created | 29 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fazaih_osmani |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:56 | 57 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 55 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 54 | +11 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 43 | +7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 36 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 36 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
36 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 36.1% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 22.2% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 19.4% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 8.33% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 8.33% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.78% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 2.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚠️ سانسور شدید این مطالب در مکتوبات عثمانیها ‼️روزنامهای در ترکیه علیه نویسنده کتابی با موضوع “لواط در دولت عثمانی” به جرم افترا شکایت کرده. بعد که فهمیدن همه این ادعاها واقعیت داشته و لواط امر رایجی بین دولتمردان عثمانی بوده، نویسنده تبرئه شده و شاکی قرار شده غرامت پرداخت کنه. این توئیت برای الآن نیست https://t.me/fazaih_osmani
🤣4😱1
🧷عکس سمت راست : مربوط به امپراتوری عثمانی نسخه خطی از ۱۷۷۳ که رابطه مقعدی گروهی بین مردان را به تصویر میکشد 🧷عکس سمت چپ : از کتاب ( ثواقب المناقب ) متعلق به امپراتوری عثمانی که رابطه جنسی بین مردان و یک پسر نوجوان را به تصویر میکشد [ MURRAY,Stephen O.: Homosexualities, 2002, s. 135 ] https://t.me/fazaih_osmani
😁4
📰 The New York Times : 📍It is also worth recalling that the Ottoman Caliphate, which ruled the Sunni Muslim world for centuries and which the current Turkish government claims to emulate, was much more open-minded on this issue. Indeed, the Ottoman Empire had an extensive literature of homosexual romance, and an accepted social category of transvestites. The Ottoman sultans, arguably, were social liberals compared…
😁2
❌سلطان محمد فاتحِ عثمانی، از فعالترینلـواطکاران زمانۀ خودَش 💢(سلطان) محمد (فاتح) که امیال جنسی خلاف عرف داشت به منظور امتحان او شبی که سرش از باده گرم بود، چنانکه غالباً عادتش بود خواجه ای را به خانه نوتاراس فرستاد، و از او خواست پسر جوان خوبروی چهارده ساله اش را برای ارضای امیال سلطان تقدیم کند وقتی او خودداری کرد سلطان فوراً دستور داد نوتاراس را همراه با پسر و دامادش گردن بزنند؛ و به روایتی ، سر هرسه را روی میز…
🤣3
🔴 بزوودی خواهیم برگشت، تک تک عثمانیها رسوا خواهیم کرد .
🔥1
✳️ نکته : ﴿عثمانیها بسیار میدونِ غازیها هستند ...﴾ 🖊 همان ص 27 https://t.me/fazaih_osmani
💥 بربریت و غازیگری در تساوی هم ♦️مهمترین این اقوام در این میان زاده جنبش مردمی قدیمی تری بود به نام غازیها ﴿ لقب سلاطین عثمانی متقدم ﴾ یا جنگاوران مقدس دین آنان که از میان داوطلبان مختلط، غالباً آواره و فراری و ناراضی، و اشخاص بیکاره در جستجوی امرار معاش به خدمت گرفته شده بودند، وظیفه شان جنگ با کفار و انگیزه اصلی شان تاراج بود. 📕 قرون عثمانی ، نویسنده لرد کین راس ، ترجمه پروانه ستاری ، صفحه 15 #غازیگری #فضایح_ع…
❤2😁2
🔴 چگونگی مسلمان شدن عثـمان یکم ( بنیانگذار امپراتوری عثمانی ) 📰 لرد کین راس ، نویسنده و مورخ برجستۀ انگلیسی بیان میکند که عثمان یکم رهبر ترکان عثمانی در اصل مسلمان نبوده بلکه وی بعد ها مسلمان شده [ افسانه اول حاکی از این است که عثمان و مردمانش - یعنی عثمانلیها ـ هنگام استقرار در منطقه اسکی شهر هنوز اسلام نیاورده بودند ] 📘 قرون عثمانی ، نویسنده لرد کین راس ، ترجمه پروانه ستاری ، صفحات 21 و 22 https://t.me/fazaih_…
❤3👎1
🚷❌ کــفر و ارتــداد سلاطین عثمانی به تصریح علمای اهل سنت 👳🏿♂عبد الله بن عبد اللطيف ( ت 1339 هـ) : 🔻سئل رحمه الله تعالى عن من لم يكفر الدولة - أي العثمانية - ومن جرهم على المسلمين واختار ولايتهم وأنه يلزمه الجهاد معهم، والآخر لا يرى ذلك كله بل الدولة ومن جرهم بغاة ولا يحل منهم إلا ما يحل من البغاة وإن ما يغنم منهم من الأعراب حرام، فأجاب:"من لم يعرف كفر الدولة ولم يفرق بينهم وبين البغاة من المسلمين لم يعرف معنى لا إ…
❤3👎1
🚷❌ کــفر و ارتــداد سلاطین عثمانی به تصریح علمای اهل سنت 👳🏿♂ سليمان بن سحمان (ت 1349 هـ) : 🔻وما قال في الأتراك من وصف كفرهم فحق فهم من أكفر الناس في النحل وأعداهم للمسلمين وشرهم ينوف ويربو في الضلال على المللْ ومن يتول الكافرين فمثلهم ولا شك في تكفيره عند من عقلْ ومن قد يواليهم ويركن نحوهم فلا شك في تفسيقه وهو في وجلْی • ترجمه متن : و آنچه او درباره ترکها ( عثمانیها) و توصیف کفرشان گفت، درست است؛ آنها از کافرتر…
❤4👎1
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم
🥰3❤1
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @fazaih_osmani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📛 فضایح العـــ☪️ـــثمانیه 🔞” (@fazaih_osmani), 57 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fazaih_osmani.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.