Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Реклама на канале @fausterisd

@fauster_price

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,226subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002186948089
TypeChannel
Username@fauster_price
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fauster_price

Growth

1,2261,2431,234.57 August 2026 — 1,243 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,240 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,240 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,226 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,223–1,246 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 05:251,226-14
7 Aug 2026, 23:021,240no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:051,240-3
7 Aug 2026, 18:411,243first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.6%
avg views ÷ 1,226 subscribers
Avg views / post
424
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (8 June 202631 July 2026)
Views total3,819
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC255 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

брал рекламу на неделю, доволен результатом все безопасно и качественно рекомендую.

28 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC387 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

не первый раз беру рекламу, очень доволен приходом. актив канала заметно вырос.

26 Jul 2026, 10:57 UTC456 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Беру не первый раз гаранты здесь, и каждый раз всё чётко. Цена оправдана, люди приходят быстро, дальше важно их самим заинтересовать контентом. Вернусь за рекламой ещё не раз это точно, ведь это намного удобнее и быстрее, нежели самим тыркаться в куче каналов по поиску. Винокур красавчик, благодарю его за работу ❤️

24 Jul 2026, 04:12 UTC425 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Брал рекламу в тгк у @winekur и могу смело сказать, что гарантия прихода 100%. Быстро, четко и не дорого, что удивительно. Лучший, рекомендую.

20 Jul 2026, 06:32 UTC487 viewsread 7 August 2026

брал рекламу на неделю и приход сильно радует. обращаюсь не первый раз, всё четко.

19 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC505 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

спасибо большое, добили быстро

17 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC447 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Благодарю владельца ,все очень быстро и качественно. Покупаю уже в 3 раз ,в дальнейшем буду также обращаться. Процветания каналу :)

14 Jul 2026, 12:48 UTC443 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

все отлично, быстро откликнулись, быстро сделали, владелец супер🤝🏻

13 Jul 2026, 21:59 UTC406 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

брал гарант, добили достаточно быстро. спасибо огромное, буду обязательно обращаться ещё. 🖤

12 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC392 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

брал гарант, отлично, много раз уже брал и буду брать только у вас. Спасибо.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fauster_price. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,061,852 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Реклама на канале @fausterisd” (@fauster_price), 1,226 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fauster_price.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.