Channel
@fatmaalieva
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
387subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001779300289 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fatmaalieva |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fatmaalieva |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 387 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 386 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 385 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 388 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 392 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 391 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 5 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
361 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 216 | 59.8% | |
| 🔥 | 56 | 15.5% | |
| 🙏 | 26 | 7.20% | |
| 🥰 | 19 | 5.26% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 4.99% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 3.88% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 1.39% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.831% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 0.831% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.277% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 361 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вау, вы видели, до чего дошел прогресс? 🤯 Вместо гормональных таблеток или ежедневных будильников с градусником — фитнес-браслет WHOOP объединили с медицинским приложением Natural Cycles (NC°). Получилась первая в мире цифровая платформа цифровой контрацепции без гормонов, официально одобренная FDA! Как это работает? Браслет сам считывает температуру кожи во время сна и передает данные в алгоритм NC°. Приложение ан…
🔥10❤4
#буднигинеколога На приеме молодая девушка. Задержка менструации на несколько дней, тест показывает две полоски. Показывает бланк с результатами исследования микрофлоры. — Вас что-то беспокоило? Были жалобы? — спрашиваю. — Нет, абсолютно ничего. Врач сказала, что нужно сдать. В результатах — уреаплазма. И ее, конечно же, сразу начали активно лечить. А узнав о задержке, тут же добавили прогестерон — «для профилакти…
❤6👍2
Медицина нормы или медицина качества жизни? На приеме мы чаще всего говорим о болезнях, симптомах и патологиях. Кажется, что главная миссия врача — просто вернуть организм в состояние «здорова». А действительно ли мы только про здоровье? Я все больше убеждаюсь: пациенты приходят к нам не за диагнозом и даже не за какой-то «нормой в анализах». Они приходят за своей привычной жизнью. Я часто задавалась вопросом: по…
❤4👍4🔥2
Друзья! Спасибо за вашу активность 🫶 «Мнения ученных сошлись!», а это значит, что мы с вами на одной волне и где-то в одной весовой возрастной категории 😉 🚀🚀🚀 P.S. за «хороша во всех проявлениях» отдельное сердечко 😘
🔥14❤9🥰3❤🔥1
Опрос анонимный, можно выбирать несколько ответов! Если нет нужных ответов (или вопросов), или хочется что-то добавить, пишите в комментариях 😉 Заранее благодарна 🌸
❤15🔥3👍2
Какая тема сейчас наиболее актуальна для вас?
The shares total 165%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
В каком «виде» я вам наиболее интересна?
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
К какой возрастной категории вы относитесь?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Video message, posted without a caption
🥰2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤5🥰1
На прошлой неделе на ресепшене клиники я случайно встретила свою бывшую пациентку. Мы тепло поздоровались, разговорились, и вдруг она с улыбкой произносит: «Я тут недавно спрашивала у сестры, куда делась Фатма Бахшишевна? А она мне говорит: да она в коучи подалась!» Я тогда только улыбнулась в ответ и даже не стала говорить, что уже скоро снова начинаю вести прием. Но эта короткая фраза навела меня на определенные р…
🔥18👍5❤4👏3🥰3💯1
Почему я больше не хочу лечить, «когда уже заболело»? Если вы со мной давно, то знаете: как врач-гинеколог я всегда была фанатом профилактики. Мой подход в медицине никогда не сводился к тушению пожаров. Я искренне убеждена, что большую часть тяжелых диагнозов, сложных состояний и раннего увядания можно предотвратить. Причем не сложными манипуляциями, а понятными, точечными шагами — если знать, что и когда делать. …
❤28🔥2❤🔥1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @fatmaalieva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какая тема сейчас наиболее актуальна для вас?
The shares total 165%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
В каком «виде» я вам наиболее интересна?
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
К какой возрастной категории вы относитесь?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2025 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фатма Алиева| Женщина•Энергия•Дело” (@fatmaalieva), 387 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fatmaalieva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.