Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for «'❌«|𝓵𝓸𝓶𝓴𝓪|»'»

Channel

«'❌«|𝓵𝓸𝓶𝓴𝓪|»'»

@fathercocaine

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

83subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003122557254
TypeChannel
Username@fathercocaine
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fathercocaine

Growth

838684.59 August 2026 — 86 subscribers9 August 2026 — 86 subscribers16 August 2026 — 83 subscribers9 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83–86 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 18:1283-3
9 Aug 2026, 16:1586no change
9 Aug 2026, 08:3086first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 27 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

268 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5119.0%
🕊4516.8%
custom 53527343112650909954316.0%
❤‍🔥4316.0%
custom 54178614429949885753111.6%
💊3111.6%
🍓103.73%
custom 544260329359333055872.61%
custom 545627408859715541131.12%
🔥31.12%
💘10.373%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 268reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 24 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 19 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fathercocaine. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 January 2026 to 24 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Feb 2026, 20:18 UTC477 views21 reactions7 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

я благополучно забыл про существование канала, йоу.🙂 фака фака мазафака, какого хера отписки пошли??? я старательный ващет

8custom 54178614429949885756🔥3🕊2custom 53527343112650909952

21 Feb 2026, 10:10 UTC170 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

3custom 54178614429949885752🕊1

21 Feb 2026, 10:10 UTC153 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

скоро дропну арт, ждите

5🕊1

14 Feb 2026, 15:09 UTC190 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥3🕊2

14 Feb 2026, 15:09 UTC181 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

рурочка, вы меня слишком балуете

🕊3❤‍🔥2

14 Feb 2026, 13:58 UTC185 views15 reactions7 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

без бумажки вы какашки, говорили они......

7❤‍🔥4🕊3💊1

14 Feb 2026, 13:57 UTC213 views13 reactions7 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ойойо, мне нравится 🌟🌟

6❤‍🔥3🕊3💊1

10 Feb 2026, 17:44 UTC164 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

дайси я тебя люблюю😊

❤‍🔥8💊4🕊3

10 Feb 2026, 17:35 UTC221 views18 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

блять,чезахуйня🌟

❤‍🔥9🕊4custom 53527343112650909954💊1

10 Feb 2026, 12:56 UTC215 views20 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

впервые за долгое время себя нарисовал😭😜

custom 53527343112650909957custom 541786144299498857554❤‍🔥1🍓1💊1🕊1

8 Feb 2026, 14:03 UTC187 views16 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

кто че там говорил про саморазвитие??🌟 мне легче посидеть порисовать няшечку, чем саморазвиваться и заниматься реально чем то полезным 🍒🍒🍒

8custom 54178614429949885754🍓1💊1🕊1custom 53527343112650909951

7 Feb 2026, 16:03 UTC207 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

on your knees🤩

custom 541786144299498857565💊4custom 53527343112650909952❤‍🔥1💘1🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fathercocaine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,131,986 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“«'❌«|𝓵𝓸𝓶𝓴𝓪|»'»” (@fathercocaine), 83 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fathercocaine.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.