Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

(REST)FATFUCKINGASS

@fatfckingass

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

55subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003853999165
TypeChannel
Username@fatfckingass
DescriptionThe king of kingdom is fattie На канале вы можете найти Стикеры Арты И в скором времени будет ещё и мерч
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/fatfckingass

Growth

545554.56 August 2026 — 54 subscribers7 August 2026 — 55 subscribers10 August 2026 — 55 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54–55 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 08:0155no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:1355+1
6 Aug 2026, 16:3554first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
136.5%
avg views ÷ 55 subscribers
Avg views / post
75.1
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,426
Reactions total99
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
52
Videos
1
Links
11

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
27s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

99 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥰4242.4%
💘2222.2%
1818.2%
❤‍🔥77.07%
🔥44.04%
🍌22.02%
💋22.02%
🤓22.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fatfckingass. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC24 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩🤩 у меня есть уже новый дизайн на фанперса просто приглядитесь к деталям 😀😀Референс будет 😀😀😀😀😌#SHITpost

🥰4💘2

9 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC30 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩❓❓❓ 😀МНЕ ОЧЕНЬ СТРАШНО НО МНЕ НРАВИТСЯ 😀😀😻#REPOST

💘3🥰1

9 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC28 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @veszschannelPhoto

Гифт для Паши,попытался сделать тень ка клюди прикольно делают хз получилось нет,да сегодня день гифтов у меня чет #арт

💘2🥰1

9 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC36 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩SO🤩🤩🤩🤩❗️❗️❗️ 😀😀Я НЕ ОЖИДАЛА ТО ЧТО МНЕ БУДУТ ДЕЛАТЬ АРТЫ БЕЗ ТРЕЙДА OR SOMETHING 👀👀👀👀 😀😀😻#REPOST

2💘1🥰1

9 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC34 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @anonboy100Photo

гифт для FATFUCKINGINGASS ! ( пересылка разрешена )

3💘1🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 05:29 UTC65 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Это так что бы вы знали что я делаю на протяжении всего реста я медведь если что 😀😀#SHITpost

💘6🥰2

4 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC72 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Яя его тоже скоро перерисую заебал 😀😀#SHITpost

🥰2💘1

4 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC68 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🥹POST 😀😀Я забыл вам показать этого вкусного мальчика с моего проекта ии я незнаю как его назвать 😀😀#PROJECT | #NEWS

🥰6💘2

4 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC60 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Думаю перерисую это а то это позор на быструю руку 😀😀😀#SHITpost

🥰3

2 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC75 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Вам очень нравится тавель я запомню👀 👨👨👨#SHITpost

🥰3❤‍🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC77 views9 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🥹POST Яяяя вечно забыла вам показать арты imm so srrry 🌟🌟🌟😣 #FPE | #MISSBLOOMIE #MISSTHAVEL #MISSCIRCLE #OLIVER #ALICE

6🥰2❤‍🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 19:08 UTC85 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

💘1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fatfckingass. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 578,601 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“(REST)FATFUCKINGASS” (@fatfckingass), 55 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fatfckingass.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.