Channel
@fatemh_zahra
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
680subscribers
+30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001758821134 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fatemh_zahra |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 28 December 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fatemh_zahra |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 680 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:02 | 681 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 682 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 683 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 681 | +31 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 650 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 650 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 28 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
مَأسٰاةُ فٰاطِمَـة﴿؏﴾ pinned «┄┅━✺𖣐﴾﷽﴿𖣐✺━┅┄ ↯لیست مطالب ڪانال↯ ⇜جهت سهولت دسترسی به مطالب،کافے است کلیک کنید. 🔅مُقـدّمــه وهدف ڪانال🔅 𖣐➸━━➵━━➵━━➸━┅┄ ✍🏻حدیث:«فَاطِمَةَ صِدِّيقَةٌ شَهِيدَةٌ» 📜متن روایت 📌بررسۍ سند ♻️شرح حدیث 𖣐➸━━➵━━➵━━➸━┅┄ ✍🏻حدیث:«وَيْلٌ لِمَنْ أَحْرَقَ بَابَهَا وشجَّ…»
﷽ 💢معمایۍ که هرگز حل نمیشود💢 ⫸آیا قتل حضرت فاطمـه﴿؏﴾ نزد اهلسنت ثواب دارد؟ ⫸اگر ثواب دارد پس اثبات آن برای اهلسنت چه سودۍ دارد؟ 💡توضیحات بیشتر:t.me/fatemh_zahra/36 ➢﴾@fatemh_zahra﴿
﷽ 📜نسخه خطۍ ڪتاب حدیث هشام بن عمار 📌عمر گفت:«اخْرُجُوا لِلْبَيْعَةِ، وَاللَّهِ لَتَخْرُجُنَّ أَوْ لَأُحَرِّقَنَّهُ عَلَيْكُمْ» یعنۍ:«به خدا قسم! یا خارج میشوید یا خانه را بر سر شما به آتش می کشم» ⫸توضیحات بیشتر: ➲https://t.me/fatemh_zahra/101
﷽ 🔥هتاکۍ عالم ناصبۍ اهلسنت به حضرت فاطمه﴿؏﴾🔥 💢"عبدالمنعم حفنی" از بزرگترین نواصب معاصر است،این زندیق در شرح حدیثی که نشان میدهد حضرت فاطمه﴿؏﴾ سرور زنان اهل بهشت است میگوید: «این احادیث مشکوک هسنند چون سروری با نسبت نیست بلکه با عمل است،آنچه فاطمه برای اسلام انجام داده اندک است!!!ومطالبه او به میراث پیامبر آغاز فتنه بزرگ وتقسیم مسلمین به شیعه وسنی بود، وتلاش فاطمه برای اسلام کجا وعایشه کجا؟»[یعنۍ تلاش فاطمه بسیار ک…
مَأسٰاةُ فٰاطِمَـة﴿؏﴾ pinned «┄┅━✺𖣐🔱﴾﷽﴿🔱𖣐✺━┅┄ 🛑دعوت به #مناظـره🛑 ⇍به استحضار میرسانیم که کانال "مأساة فاطمه﴿؏﴾" علما،طلاب واساتید اهلسنت را به مناظره در خصوص مظلومیّت حضرت زهرا﴿؏﴾ دعوت مۍنماید. ⇍این مناظره بصورت سلسله وار در قالب ۴ یا ۵ مناظره برای بررسۍ تمام جوانب مظلومیّت های حضرت…»
♻️چند نڪته در مورد روایت: این روایتِ صحیح السند، سقط وشهادت محسن بن علۍ﴿؏﴾ را تأڪید میڪند. 𖣐➸━━➵━━━➵━━➸━┅┄ ❌طبعاً ادعای اینکه سقط بصورت طبیعۍ بوده ،مجازفه وتعسّف است زیرا در مقابل مرویات متواترۍ داریم که سبب سقط حضرت محسن را ضربه هاۍ هجوم کنندگان بیان میکنند؛پس با اعتضاد این روایت صحیح به طائفه دیگرِ اخبار مۍیابیم که حضرت زهرا﴿؏﴾ در اثر ضرب وجرح عمر وسربازانش ، محسن بن علۍ﴿؏﴾ را سقط کرده. ⚠️روایاتۍ ڪه نحوه سقط را…
﷽ ✍🏻بررسۍ صحّت روایت ⇣تصحیح علما⇣ ⫸علامه محمدتقۍ مجلسۍ: ﴿وفي القوي، عن أبي بصير﴾ 📚📗روضة المتقين ج:۸ ص:۶۲۵ ⫸سیّد خوئۍ: ﴿الطريق كطريق الشيخ إليه صحيح﴾ 📚📗معجم رجال الحديث ج:۱۵ ص:۶۸ 𖣐➵━━➵━━━➵━━➸━┅┄ ⇣بررسۍ رجال سند⇣ دو طریق براۍ روایت ذکر شده: 📌سند شیخ کلینۍ:«عِدَّةٌ مِنْ أَصْحَابِنَا عَنْ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ مُحَمَّدٍ عَنِ اَلْقَاسِمِ بْنِ يَحْيَى عَنْ جَدِّهِ اَلْحَسَنِ بْنِ رَاشِدٍ عَنْ أَبِي بَصِيرٍ» 📌سند شیخ…
┄┅━𖣐🔱﴾﷽﴿🔱𖣐━┅┄ سقط شدن حضرت مُحَسِّنْ﴿؏﴾ [با سند صحیح] 📌امیرالمؤمنین﴿؏﴾ فرمودند:«پیش از آنکه فرزندانتان متولد شوند برایشان اسم بگذارید...،زيرا فرزندان سقـط شده ۍ شما در روز قيامت به هنگام ديدار، از شما شكايت مىكنند و مىگويند:«چرا براى ما نام نگذاشتى؟!»همانا پيامبر خداﷺ پيش از آنكه محسن متولّد شود برايش نام نهاد». عِدَّةٌ مِنْ أَصْحَابِنَا عَنْ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ مُحَمَّدٍ عَنِ اَلْقَاسِمِ بْنِ يَحْيَى عَنْ جَدِّهِ …
Sticker, posted without a caption
﷽ 📜#مناظــــــره📜 🛑موضوع: •|غَضَـب حضْرَت فٰاطِمـه﴿؏﴾|• ✺شیعــہ: ﴿حَـیْدَࢪ ابوسُہَیْل﴾ ✺اهلسنت: ﴿منیـب انطاکی﴾ 𖣐➵━━➵━━━➵━━➸━┅┄ #تاریخ: ۱۲آذر ۱۴۰۰ ⇣هم اڪنون مطالعـه ڪنید⇣ 💢لینڪ مناظـره | جمـع بنـدۍ💢 ➢﴾@fatemh_zahra﴿
در عصر رسانه، نقاب ها زود می افتند وملامح هراس هویدا میشوند ✘کجایند کسانۍ که در کُلبه بسته ادعا میکردند شهادت حضرت زهرا﴿؏﴾ افسانه است؟ ✋🏻ما منتظر علما واساتید مخالفین هستیم برای مناظره صوتی هستیم. ➢﴾@fatemh_zahra﴿
┄┄┅━༅𖣔﷽𖣔༅━┅┄┄ 『🔻』نص علماۍ امامیه بر تواتر شهادت حضرت فاطمه﴿؏﴾ تواتر اجمالۍ شهادت حضرت زهرا بر هر محقق متتبع پوشیده نیست، از این رو کلام برخی از علما راجع به این مورد را نقل میکنیم. ⫸علامه محمّدتقۍ مجلسۍ: «واما شهيده نزد شيعه #متواتر است از أئمة أهل البيت صلوات الله عليهم كه عمر در بر شكم آن حضرت زد به شركت قنفذ و فرزندى كه حضرت المرسلين صلى الله عليه و آله أو را محسن ناميده بودند ساقط شد» 📚📕لوامع صاحبقرانى ج:۸ ص:…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fatemh_zahra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📌بنظر شما ڪاربران گرامۍ در أیّام آینده چه مباحثۍ را در ڪانال بارگزارۍ ڪنیم؟! #لطفا_درنظرسنجۍ_شرڪت_ڪنید
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2021 to 3 February 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مَأسٰاةُ فٰاطِمَـة﴿؏﴾” (@fatemh_zahra), 680 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fatemh_zahra.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.