Загадка моих пальцев «факушек» так и не раскрыта… У меня держаться те ногти, которые обычно должны ломаться, но только не средние пальцы😂 У кого-то так же происходит или это аномалия?
❤3custom 60847417494842923313

Channel
@fata_shelf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
63subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004426851089 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fata_shelf |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 30 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fata_shelf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 63 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 64 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:51 | 64 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (30 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 709 |
| Reactions total | 96 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 02:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
96 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 46.9% | |
| custom 5318842904720989904 | 11 | 11.5% | |
| 💘 | 11 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5274099425784901817 | 7 | 7.29% | |
| custom 5343689543931415684 | 6 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5197301304543703543 | 5 | 5.21% | |
| custom 6084741749484292331 | 5 | 5.21% | |
| custom 5413866255826309614 | 4 | 4.17% | |
| custom 5350633131659532891 | 2 | 2.08% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Загадка моих пальцев «факушек» так и не раскрыта… У меня держаться те ногти, которые обычно должны ломаться, но только не средние пальцы😂 У кого-то так же происходит или это аномалия?
❤3custom 60847417494842923313
Я вот думаю, может ещё один розыгрыш устроить к концу лета? Так сказать проводить моё любимое время года? Что думаете?
❤3
Делаем розыгрыш книги?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Я в восторге от этих раскрасок и не ожидала, что будет вторая часть у той, что сейчас раскрашиваю💔 Если кому нужно будет, то по промокоду «FATA» все ещё работает скидка 5% для вас🫶🏻
❤3
🖤 DARKLINE 2 открыт для предзаказа Вы ждали продолжение. Мы готовили его в полной тишине. Сегодня официально открываем DARKLINE 2 🔥 Внутри Вас ждут любимые герои, из таких фильмов как: • Алиса в стане чудес • Чарли и шоколадная фабрика • Дом странных детей • Эдвард руки-ножницы и многие другие😍 Внутри: • 40 новых иллюстраций • 1 полноценный разворот • авторский конверт • стикеры в комплекте 🎁 Бонусы раннего дос…
❤5custom 51973013045437035431custom 53188429047209899041
Мне сегодня изменили цвет блонда, у кого есть идеи в какой оттенок протонировали? Пы.сы.: кто в курсе молчим, карты не раскрываем😁
❤5💘4custom 52740994257849018173
Всю дорогу, что я читала эту книгу, я думала о том, какая музыка у каждого героя?👀 Настолько мне это засело, что я решила сделать свою подборку😂 Кто читал, с чем согласны или какие у вас есть варианты?)) #отделх #книжныйотзыв #книги #детектив #элхартли #книжныйблог
❤6custom 53436895439314156846custom 54138662558263096144
💗💗💗💗💗 🔪«Отдел Х: Картотека неприятностей» Эл Хартли 🔍 Эта книга заняла первую страничку в моем электронном читательском дневнике🥰 Я ставлю этой книге 🍒😘😘🏆🍒😘 Она точно войдет в мой топ 2026 года🤌 Автор пишет так легко и цепляюще, что буквально с первых страниц втягиваешься и уже не можешь оторваться. Персонажи раскрываются просто классно: каждый со своим характером, заморочками и сильными сторонами. Ты постепенн…
custom 53188429047209899048❤4custom 53506331316595328912
Вы прикиньте, в Москве наконец-то полноценный солнечный день без намеков на тучки-вонючки и с 30+ градусами на улице🍑 Спасибо за целый день лета в начале августа🤡
❤6💘4custom 53188429047209899042
1 августа: наступает Мои покупки: 🎃🎃
❤8custom 51973013045437035432custom 60847417494842923312
Она с котенка всегда бежит лечь на любую книгу, которую я оставлю хоть на секунду без внимания в её присутствии🤡 Электронная тоже попала в этот список, видимо это великая кошачья тема, как с клавиатурами🌚
custom 52740994257849018174💘3❤2custom 51973013045437035432
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @fata_shelf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Делаем розыгрыш книги?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 373,007 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Книги и баночки по полочкам✨” (@fata_shelf), 63 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fata_shelf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.