Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏͏ ͏ ͏💀 𑁯 𝕱𝐀𝐒𝐓&𝑳𝑶𝑼𝑫 ˊˎ-

@fastandloudfest

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

26subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003194840916
TypeChannel
Username@fastandloudfest
Description𝖧𝖤𝖸 𝖫𝖠𝖣𝖨𝖤𝖲! 𝖧𝖤𝖸 𝖥𝖤𝖫𝖫𝖠𝖲! 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗣𝗘𝗢𝗣𝗟𝗘 𝗪𝗛𝗢 𝗗𝗢𝗡'𝗧 𝗚𝗜𝗩𝗘 𝗔 𝕱𝗨𝗖𝗞!
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/fastandloudfest

Growth

2611 Aug 2026, 22:01 — 26 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 22:15 — 26 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 22:0111 Aug 2026, 22:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25–27 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 22:1526no change
11 Aug 2026, 22:0126first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
323.1%
avg views ÷ 26 subscribers
Avg views / post
84.0
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 March 202611 August 2026)
Views total1,176
Reactions total51
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 22:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
29
Links
23

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥1323.6%
💋1018.2%
814.5%
🔥814.5%
🎉712.7%
💘610.9%
🎃23.64%
👏11.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 21:40 UTC10 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⠀ ㅤ 💀 𑁯 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐓𝐓𝐘 𝐑𝐄𝐂𝐊𝐋𝐄𝐒 ˊˎ- 𝗇𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗐𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗀𝗂𝗋𝗅 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝖺 𝗐𝗂𝖼𝗄𝖾𝖽 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖽... ㅤ⠀ㅤ⠀ 𝗌𝖾𝗉𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝟧𝗍𝗁 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀𝖋𝐚𝐬𝐭&𝒍𝒐𝒖𝒅. ⠀

❤‍🔥1💋1

10 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC56 views20 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⠀ ㅤ ㅤ💀 𑁯 𝐀𝐄𝐌𝐎𝐍𝐃 𝐌𝐂𝐊𝐀𝐆𝐀𝐍 ˊˎ- 𝖼𝖺𝗇'𝗍 𝗏𝖺𝖼𝗎𝗎𝗆 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝗍 𝗈𝖿𝖿 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝗁𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗍... ㅤ⠀ㅤ⠀ 𝗌𝖾𝗉𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝟧𝗍𝗁 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀𝖋𝐚𝐬𝐭&𝒍𝒐𝒖𝒅. ⠀

💘4🔥43❤‍🔥3🎉3💋2🎃1

10 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC29 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⠀ ㅤ ㅤ ⠀⠀ 💀 𑁯 𝐉𝐔𝐋𝐈𝐀 𝐖𝐎𝐋𝐅 ˊˎ- ㅤ ⠀𝗂 𝗐𝖺𝗇𝗍 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗌 𝗂𝗇 𝗆𝗒 𝗋𝗈𝗈𝗆... ㅤ⠀ㅤ⠀ 𝗌𝖾𝗉𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝟧𝗍𝗁 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀𝖋𝐚𝐬𝐭&𝒍𝒐𝒖𝒅. ⠀

❤‍🔥1🎃1🎉1💘1

9 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC127 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀𝐈𝐓'𝐒 𝕱𝐀𝐒𝐓&𝑳𝑶𝑼𝑫! ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗒𝖾𝖺𝗋'𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝗍𝗒 𝗂𝗌... ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀𝕷𝐎𝐍𝐃𝐎𝐍. ⠀

💋3❤‍🔥2🎉1💘1🔥1

19 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC148 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⠀ 𝐅𝐀𝐒𝐓&𝐋𝐎𝐔𝐃 𝐈𝐒 𝐁𝐀𝐂𝐊! 𝖮 𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗎‌𝗌𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗎 𝗂𝗇𝗂‌𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺‌ 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗋𝗂‌𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖼𝗈𝗌! 𝖰𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗇𝖺 𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖼‌𝖺‌𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗈? 𝖭𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈. ⠀

3❤‍🔥2💋2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fastandloudfest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 116,953 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏͏ ͏ ͏💀 𑁯 𝕱𝐀𝐒𝐓&𝑳𝑶𝑼𝑫 ˊˎ-” (@fastandloudfest), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fastandloudfest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.