3 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 678–680 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 09:41
678
-2
8 Aug 2026, 02:31
680
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:45
680
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 678 subscribers
Avg views / post
73.3
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,465
Reactions total
81
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 02s
Average length
4m 02s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
81 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💔
21
25.9%
👍
15
18.5%
👏
10
12.3%
❤
5
6.17%
👎
5
6.17%
💊
5
6.17%
🔥
4
4.94%
🤡
4
4.94%
🤬
4
4.94%
💯
3
3.70%
😭
3
3.70%
😁
1
1.23%
🤔
1
1.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👈 ایشون و تو آب نمک میخوابونند تا انتخابات همین آدم که الان این حرفا رو میزنه بیاد از کاندید انقلابی یا اصولگرا حمایت کنه
اونوقت جامعه کار ندارن دیگه کاندید اصلاح طلب کاربلد نیست ...
میرن بهش رای میدن ...
👈 اصلاح طلبم که همیشه فرصت شناسه
صبر میکنه اون روز همه اینا رو که جمع کرده میریزه تو دست و بال ملت
لازمم نیست کارنامه و برنامه ارائه بده
⁉️ سوال 👈 چرا یک عده اصلاح طلبان بعد اینکه هربار در جامعه با تفکرات خود فاجعه آفرینی میکنن ولی بازم رای اکثریت را در انتخابات ها کسب میکنند ؟ 🤔
✅ پاسخ در تصویر بالا
👈 ایشون گفته باید از جمهوری اسلامی عبور کنیم و حکومت اسلامی تشکیل بدیم😕
دفتر رهبر تکذیب کرد
اونم طی یه واکنش فوری !!
☑️ رهبر میگه وحدت
اعتماد به مسئولان دلسوز
ایشون میگن سرنگونی دولت و عبور از نظام با قیام مردمی😐
❌ از وقتی دفتر رهبر چرندیات شو تکذیب کرد اومده پشت دفتر و بیت آقا هم حرف میزنه
آدم یاد منتظری و طرفداراش میوفته
#دقت_کنید 👇
👈 الان یه پهلوی چی یا یه آدم اصلاح طلب افراطی ضد نظام یا یکی با حرفای ضد نظام بیاد به شما بگه بریم خیابون شعار ضد نظام بدین و علیه نظام اقدامی کنید؟ اطاعت میکنید ؟ 🤔❗
_ قطعا میگید خیر
چرا؟
چون مشخصه دشمنه
❌👈 نفوذی هیچ وقت شکل دشمن نیست
دقیقا شکل خود ما هست
حرفاش از حرفای خودمونم تند تره
مراقب اوناییکه از رهبر مملکت افتادن جلو و با بهانه دفترش آلوده هست اطرافیانش خائنن، ناتوانه، دست بسته اس و...…
اجرای حکم الهی اینه بریزی قتل عام کنی؟ 😐
👈 امیدوارم همه مردم بدونن این تفکر ربطی به اسلام و انقلاب نداره
و بلکه اسلام خوارج و سفیانیه 😒
عجایب خلقتی دیدم در این دشت
سرش را میبردی زنده میگشت
شیخ خرازی: 😳
فتوا میدهم بی حجاب هارو بکشید،
لشکر کشی کنید و برهنه هارو به قتل برسونید اگه دولت اومد اونارم بزنید،
این دولت شیطانیه و زیر دست آمریکاست...😒
#دقت_کنید 👇
یکی از شیرینترین اتفاقاتی که در این چندروز اخیر رخ داده این است که کمکم دارد زمینههای لازم برای جدا شدن خط تندروهای نصیحتناپذیر و نسبتا کمتعداد، اما پُرسروصدا و بعضا پُرمخاطب، از اکثریت مردم مبعوثشده و نخبگان بصیر و دلسوز انقلابی فراهم میشود؛
همان جماعتی که با بیصبریها، نقزدنها و پابهزمینکوبیدنها، با نادیدهگرفتن پیچیدگیهای میدانی، با بیتوجهی به محذورات و ملاحظات ناشی از شرائط جنگی، با س…
#اختصاصی_فصل_بیداری ✍
ایران، به دلیل اینکه بازی «مقصرنمایی» دشمن را بلد است، میز مذاکره را واژگون نکرد. آمریکا، پیش از شلیک اولین گلوله، دنبال یک روایت آماده میگردد؛ روایتی که در آن، تهران متهم ردیف اول باشد و آمریکا، بازیگرِ ناچار. این همان صحنهآرایی قدیمی است: فشار میآورند، تهدید میکنند، شرطهای تحقیرآمیز میگذارند و اگر طرف مقابل نپذیرفت، فریاد میزنند که «دیدید؟ ایران مذاکرهگریز است!»
در چنین معادلهای، ت…
محل نزاع و درگیری خودتان را کجا قرار دادهاید ؟!
پس از شکست سنگین دشمن در جنگ مستقیم و کودتای بینظیر علیه ایران عزیز، قطعا هدف دشمن صهیونیستی کشاندن درگیری به داخل کشور و ایجاد آشوب داخلی است.
لذا هرگونه اختلاف و تشتت، چه در حوزهٔ سیاسی و اختلافات جناحهای مختلف، چه در حوزهٔ فرهنگی و اجتماعی و چه در زمینهٔ اقتصادی و نارسائیهای موجود، تکمیل پازل دشمن و تغییر نتیجه پیروزی در جنگ رودروست!
فراموشی دشمن اصلی و گرفتار …
👍1👏1💔1💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @faslebidarri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 311,611 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فصل بیداری” (@faslebidarri), 678 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/faslebidarri.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.