Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for fazombie!

Channel

fazombie!

@fashionzombie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

131subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001133031728
TypeChannel
Username@fashionzombie
Created11 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fashionzombie

Growth

1291311306 August 2026 — 129 subscribers9 August 2026 — 129 subscribers12 August 2026 — 131 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 129–131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:14131+2
9 Aug 2026, 01:16129no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:28129first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 20 November 2019the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 43s
Average length
1m 22s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1152.4%
🤔942.9%
😢14.76%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2019 to 13 March 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Mar 2023, 03:28 UTC266 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

а24 опять купили академию, но теперь никто не против

🤔2

4 Mar 2023, 14:06 UTC426 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

А чего, король и шут норм сериал?

🤔53😢1

17 Mar 2022, 08:41 UTC465 viewsread 9 August 2026

сегодня в 20:00 русские субтитры чёт волнуюсь больше чем перед сетами

17 Mar 2022, 08:41 UTC640 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @zinzimemPhoto

В Южной рюмочной смотрим сегодня самую волшебную нежность от Андерсона. Пьем вино, обсуждаем с одним из любимых наших диджеев.

4

11 Mar 2022, 23:59 UTC488 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Мой брат не тигр, мой брат эмигрировал

🤔1

11 Mar 2022, 15:36 UTC419 viewsread 9 August 2026

2022 - реселлеры стали фарцовщиками

11 Mar 2022, 13:17 UTC439 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Экстремистами не будут считаться владельцы аккаунтов в соцсетях Meta и те, кто продолжат общение на платформах компании, несмотря на блокировки, — сенатор Клишас То есть инстаграмм просто почистит свои ряды от совсем VPN безграмотных. Может телега успеет внедрить истории как планировала, удержит трафик.

30 Jul 2020, 17:54 UTC979 viewsread 9 August 2026

"Damn I thought this was a song, but it’s actually someone doing a kid Cudi hum and singing over an instrumental" https://youtu.be/9IVO5Dsz1KI

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @fashionzombie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“fazombie!” (@fashionzombie), 131 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fashionzombie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.