Channel
@fashion_sta888
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
577subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002997781716 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fashion_sta888 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fashion_sta888 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 577 | +5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 572 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 573 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 579 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 580 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 583 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 583 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
117 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5368719732864218111 | 28 | 23.9% | |
| custom 5269549406151021925 | 24 | 20.5% | |
| custom 5246843133827765038 | 21 | 17.9% | |
| custom 5282985068875257967 | 19 | 16.2% | |
| custom 5417972098532397031 | 15 | 12.8% | |
| custom 5361728037207421761 | 10 | 8.55% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
история главного дизайнера мира моды - Джон Гальяно fashionist’a #историямоды
custom 53687197328642181119custom 52695494061510219258custom 52468431338277650384custom 53617280372074217612custom 52829850688752579671
история появления косметички 👱♀️ fashionist’a #историямоды
custom 52468431338277650389custom 54179720985323970313custom 53687197328642181112custom 52695494061510219251custom 52829850688752579671
обещанная рубрика #кейсы кейс сайта модного журнала fashionist’a 🤍 задача: создать сайт, который 1)будет отражать эстетику канала 2)соберет всю информацию из разных уголков интернета в одном месте 3)запустит конверсии на переход и покупку услуг 4)будет собирать всю аналитику (количество кликов, переходов и тд) решение: яркий, минималистичный сайт, подходящий под любой сезон (канал немного обновляет эстетику каждый м…
custom 53687197328642181116
небольшая рекламная пауза да
custom 52695494061510219251
firkin bag — что это за сумка и почему о ней все говорят? 💗 если вы хоть немного сидите в модном интернете, то наверняка уже встречали firkin bag. название образовано от fake + Birkin — и по сути это сумка, которая повторяет конструкцию и визуальную эстетику культовой Birkin, но выпускается не самим Hermès. у неё узнаваемая форма, жёсткий силуэт, ручки, клапан и характерная фурнитура — всё то, за что мы узнаём Bir…
custom 52695494061510219256custom 53687197328642181111
https://fashionistaa.tilda.ws ❤️❤️❤️
custom 52695494061510219257custom 54179720985323970314custom 52829850688752579673custom 53687197328642181112custom 52468431338277650381custom 53617280372074217611
fashionist’a #фотосет
custom 54179720985323970318custom 53617280372074217616custom 53687197328642181113custom 52468431338277650381custom 52829850688752579671
Dior, f/w 2007 (designed by JONH GALLIANO) fashionist’a #фотосет
custom 528298506887525796713custom 52468431338277650386custom 53687197328642181115custom 52695494061510219251custom 53617280372074217611
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @fashion_sta888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“fashionist’a” (@fashion_sta888), 577 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fashion_sta888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.