Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Новости ФАС России

Channel

Новости ФАС России

@fas_time

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,286subscribers

-179 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001383100683
TypeChannel
Username@fas_time
DescriptionНеофициальный канал с официальными новостями ФАС России Обратная связь: @zakupkiAdmin Купить рекламу: https://telega.in/c/fas_time Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67915e21f3169f6df90640d5
Created8 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/fas_time

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@fas_time/12900 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC@roszakupki/115006 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC1.0011 minutes
@fas_time/12923 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC@roszakupki/1152012 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC1.00under a minute
@fas_time/12936 · this entry14 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC@roszakupki/1153014 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC1.003 minutes
@fas_time/12978 · this entry21 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC@roszakupki/1155221 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC1.0025 minutes
@fas_time/12994 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC@roszakupki/1156225 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC1.007 minutes
@fas_time/13265 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 07:32 UTC@roszakupki/118222 Nov 2026, 07:33 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@roszakupki11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005 minutesthis entry (11–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 89 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

11,28111,46611,373.511,2866 August 202610 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 96 days, net -179. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,253–11,494 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 09:2111,286+5
8 Nov 2026, 13:0511,281-2
7 Nov 2026, 08:5611,283-1
6 Nov 2026, 12:2511,284-3
5 Nov 2026, 08:5611,287-3
4 Nov 2026, 10:0511,290+1
3 Nov 2026, 09:3611,289+2
2 Nov 2026, 07:5611,287-3
1 Nov 2026, 08:5511,290-7
31 Oct 2026, 09:4411,297-1
30 Oct 2026, 12:5611,298-4
29 Oct 2026, 11:3711,302-3
28 Oct 2026, 11:5611,305-3
27 Oct 2026, 14:5411,308-3
26 Oct 2026, 15:3611,311-4
25 Oct 2026, 13:4011,315-4
24 Oct 2026, 14:5011,319-3
23 Oct 2026, 11:1911,322+1
22 Oct 2026, 14:1711,321+2
21 Oct 2026, 06:3211,319first reading

Engagement

115 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.15%
avg views ÷ 11,286 subscribers
Avg views / post
355
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
31
of 115 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held115 (3 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total11,017
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 21:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,330
Videos
≈198
Links
≈6,320

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 11s
Average length
1m 06s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (19.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 14:21 UTC80 viewsread 10 November 2026

⚖️ Подборка правовых каналов в Telegram и MAX Сделали для вас подборку полезных каналов в Telegram и Макс, которые помогут вам регулярно получать ценную информацию и уверенно ориентироваться в правовом поле. ▫️Новости ВС РФ - Telegram | MAX ▫️Конституционный Суд РФ - Telegram | MAX ▫️Правовые акты РФ - Telegram | MAX ▫️Законопроекты РФ - Telegram | MAX ▫️Кадровику - Telegram | MAX ▫️Госзакупки и тендеры - Telegram …

10 Nov 2026, 10:21 UTC193 viewsread 10 November 2026

‌ФАС призывает производителей продуктов сообщать о случаях дискриминации со стороны торговых сетей Новости ФАС RSS Служба напоминает, что взаимоотношения между производителями и торговыми сетями напрямую влияют на ценообразование для потребителей Закон о торговле запрещает ставить контрагентов в неравное положение*. Например, если одна торговая сеть предъявляет поставщику менее выгодные требования по сравнению с др…

10 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC189 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🌐 Федеральная антимонопольная служба (ФАС России) Можно ли привлечь внимание к товару с помощью оскорбительных выражений в рекламе? Сегодня разберем ч. 6 ст. 5 Закона о рекламе. Она запрещает использовать в рекламе бранные слова, непристойные и оскорбительные образы, сравнения и выражения. Пример 💼 В Московское областное УФАС России России поступило обращение физлица на рекламу пиломатериалов, размещенную в интер…

9 Nov 2026, 14:29 UTC231 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🌐 Федеральная антимонопольная служба (ФАС России) Служба продолжает проверять тарифы на обращение с ТКО ФАС провела проверки в 22 регионах. В ряде субъектов ведомство выявило системные нарушения учета и экономического обоснования расходов на транспортирование ТКО. 📌 О каких органах регулирования идет речь? 📌 Какие нарушения они допустили? 📌 И что сделала ФАС по результатам проверок? Ответы в карточках.

9 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC231 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🌐 Федеральная антимонопольная служба (ФАС России) Служба продолжает проверять тарифы на обращение с ТКО ФАС провела проверки в 22 регионах. В ряде субъектов ведомство выявило системные нарушения учета и экономического обоснования расходов на транспортирование ТКО. 📌 О каких органах регулирования идет речь? 📌 Какие нарушения они допустили? 📌 И что сделала ФАС по результатам проверок? Ответы в карточках.

9 Nov 2026, 10:35 UTC241 viewsread 10 November 2026

ФАС проконтролирует тарифы на услуги по обслуживанию газового оборудования Новости ФАС RSS ФАС России и представители региональных службы по тарифам (РСТ) на совещании обсудили вопросы, связанные с новым порядком расчета услуг по техническому обслуживанию, установке и замене внутридомового и внутриквартирного газового оборудования (ВДГО и ВКГО) Ранее ФАС России получила полномочия по регулированию стоимости техниче…

6 Nov 2026, 15:50 UTC379 viewsread 10 November 2026

‌11–12 ноября пройдет ХI Международная научно-практическая конференция «Антимонопольная политика: наука, практика и образование» Новости ФАС RSS Мероприятие состоится в формате модерируемых дискуссий с участием представителей ФАС России, регуляторов – членов ЕАЭС, БРИКС, стран-партнеров, судейского корпуса и ведущих экспертов в области антимонопольного регулирования Повестка конференции включает пленарное заседание…

6 Nov 2026, 11:12 UTC567 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🌐 Федеральная антимонопольная служба (ФАС России) ФАС подвела итоги контрольной деятельности в сфере закупок Служба выдала 10385 предписаний об устранении нарушений. 📎 Сколько плановых и внеплановых проверок провело ведомство? 📎 О чем говорит снижение их числа? 📎 И сколько жалоб поступило в службу за 9 месяцев 2026 года? Ответы собрали для вас в карточках.

6 Nov 2026, 07:39 UTC274 viewsread 9 November 2026

В 2026 году ФАС согласовала 32 торговые политики доминирующих компаний Новости ФАС RSS Принятие таких документов позволяет обеспечивать прозрачное ценообразование и единые правила работы для всех участников рынка С начала текущего года служба согласовала торгово-сбытовые политики на рынках сырья для производства керамогранита, цемента, минеральных удобрений, нефтехимической продукции и угля. Принятые документы опр…

5 Nov 2026, 10:03 UTC784 viewsread 9 November 2026

ФАС: конкуренция в закупках медицинского оборудования направлена на безопасность и доступность медпомощи Об этом сообщил заместитель руководителя ФАС России Антон Тесленко на форуме «Национальное здравоохранение - 2026» В рамках программы форума Антон Тесленко рассказал об основных направлениях работы ФАС России по обеспечению конкуренции в сфере закупок медицинского оборудования. В частности, он остановился на пр…

5 Nov 2026, 08:10 UTC773 viewsread 9 November 2026

ФАС за 9 месяцев рассмотрела более 33 тыс. жалоб в сфере госзакупок 5 ноября. INTERFAX.RU - Федеральная антимонопольная служба (ФАС) России за 9 месяцев 2026 года рассмотрела по существу 33,18 тыс. жалоб в сфере госзакупок (21,65 тыс. в I полугодии - ИФ), говорится в сообщении службы. Всего в отчетном периоде в ФАС поступило 39,7 тыс. жалоб, что на 4% больше аналогичного показателя 2025 года (26,2 тыс. жалоб по ито…

Showing the 12 most recent of 115 posts we hold for @fas_time. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@fas_time edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 7 posts on @fas_time as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
22 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 42 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ФАС России | FAS Russia
@fasrussia · 33,616
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
ГИС ЕИС ЗАКУПКИ
@gis_eiszakupki · 89,095
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
Мосэнергосбыт
@mosenergosbyt_official · 24,075
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 September 2026
Закупки и тендеры по 44-ФЗ, 223-ФЗ
@zakupki44fz · 48,697
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
ГАРАНТ. Новости законодательства
@garantnews · 24,524
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
Новости ВС РФ
@vsrf_ru · 59,719
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Конституционный Суд
@ksrf_ru · 28,083
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
РТС-тендер
@rtstenderinfo · 24,982
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
ГИС ТОРГИ ПРОДАЖИ
@gis_torgi_prodaji · 24,284
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Новости ФАС России” (@fas_time), 11,286 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fas_time.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.